Jump to content

Clarence Thomas IS conflicted


Is Clarence Thomas conflicted?  

41 members have voted

  1. 1. Is Clarence Thomas conflicted?

    • Yes
      25
    • No
      16


Recommended Posts

Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Again, I'm not at all certain why anything I said would lead you to that conclusion.  I'm happy to answer your question (again), but common courtesy dictates that you answer mine:  

 

Do you feel that Justice Thomas is unworthy of being called inspirational?  That seems to be a sticking point for you, and I don't understand why.  

Not my place to say who inspires people. If he inspires you, that's great. 

 

Just seems strange to me a person that got ahead by using AA is so supported by people opposed to AA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Not my place to say who inspires people. If he inspires you, that's great. 

 

Just seems strange to me a person that got ahead by using AA is so supported by people opposed to AA. 

That's weird, though, because you could have just said that, instead of trying to take us down a rabbit hole on my feelings about affirmative action.   Then, when I was trying to gain clarity, you pushed the envelope a bit and shared how you figured I wasn't "for" affirmative action.  

 

As for Clarence Thomas, I think views like yours are provincial, short-sighted and apply classic liberal logic.  I also think it's sort of odd that with all the opinions we espouse here on a regular basis, suddenly ole Tibsy won't say whether or not a SC justice might be an inspiration to people.  

 

His views are shaped on his life experiences, education, and so on.  I don't know that he feels he got ahead "by using affirmative action", I'm certain he feels he was successful because he worked hard, studied hard, devoted himself to his craft, and did what most people simply cannot do.  He's a one in multiple-hundreds-of-millions human being.  

 

I didn't have those experiences, but I can speak to mine.  I worked for a couple decades in one of the largest corporations in the country and was rewarded with opportunity.   I tried to make the most of the opportunity, and while in a management role spoke occasionally with other employees who thought affirmative action was unnecessary and unfair.   Based on what I saw, opportunity was plentiful for all, understanding that it hadn't always been that way and that progress had been made and additional progress was needed.  I also know my experience might not have been indicative of every situation at every company and surely wasn't. 

 

I can see challenges with affirmative action, and it would be silly to suggest some hearts were not broken along the way when well qualified people missed out on opportunity because of their skin color or gender.  I also know that had my experience not been so positive generally speaking, I may have felt differently.  It's complicated, really.  

 

All in all, I think affirmative action was well-intentioned at the onset, was necessary in many ways, and was generally noble concept.  I don't know if it's time has passed as I'm not really involved in with it in any way these days.  

 

 

 

 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

That's weird, though, because you could have just said that, instead of trying to take us down a rabbit hole on my feelings about affirmative action.   Then, when I was trying to gain clarity, you pushed the envelope a bit and shared how you figured I wasn't "for" affirmative action.  

 

As for Clarence Thomas, I think views like yours are provincial, short-sighted and apply classic liberal logic.  I also think it's sort of odd that with all the opinions we espouse here on a regular basis, suddenly ole Tibsy won't say whether or not a SC justice might be an inspiration to people.  

 

His views are shaped on his life experiences, education, and so on.  I don't know that he feels he got ahead "by using affirmative action", I'm certain he feels he was successful because he worked hard, studied hard, devoted himself to his craft, and did what most people simply cannot do.  He's a one in multiple-hundreds-of-millions human being.  

 

I didn't have those experiences, but I can speak to mine.  I worked for a couple decades in one of the largest corporations in the country and was rewarded with opportunity.   I tried to make the most of the opportunity, and while in a management role spoke occasionally with other employees who thought affirmative action was unnecessary and unfair.   Based on what I saw, opportunity was plentiful for all, understanding that it hadn't always been that way and that progress had been made and additional progress was needed.  I also know my experience might not have been indicative of every situation at every company and surely wasn't. 

 

I can see challenges with affirmative action, and it would be silly to suggest some hearts were not broken along the way when well qualified people missed out on opportunity because of their skin color or gender.  I also know that had my experience not been so positive generally speaking, I may have felt differently.  It's complicated, really.  

 

All in all, I think affirmative action was well-intentioned at the onset, was necessary in many ways, and was generally noble concept.  I don't know if it's time has passed as I'm not really involved in with it in any way these days.  

 

 

 

 

How would I know if he inspired people? Anita Hill didn't seem inspired by him 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Why did you ask me then?  I had already said he was an inspiration, and you're acknowledging it's beyond your capacity to render an opinion on such things.  

 

 

Because you said he was a giant of American history. I just don't see that at all. That seems more like political bias on your part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Because you said he was a giant of American history. I just don't see that at all. That seems more like political bias on your part. 

Ok, you’re wrong (again) but you didn’t say that either.   I would have said “Oh, ok.”. 


Just to be clear moving forward, you’re not the inspiration guy, but you’re incredibly comfortable telling people who their giants of American history should or should not be? 
 


 


 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ok, you’re wrong (again) but you didn’t say that either.   I would have said “Oh, ok.”. 


Just to be clear moving forward, you’re not the inspiration guy, but you’re incredibly comfortable telling people who their giants of American history should or should not be? 
 

 

You are absolutely correct - how dare Tibs get your giants confused?

 

21546932-7732061-image-a-67_157488160122

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ok, you’re wrong (again) but you didn’t say that either.   I would have said “Oh, ok.”. 


Just to be clear moving forward, you’re not the inspiration guy, but you’re incredibly comfortable telling people who their giants of American history should or should not be? 
 


 


 


 

 

I’m wrong about what? 

 

You are not not making sense. Are you telling me that it’s a  fact  that “Thomas is a giant of American history” ? 

 

Seriously? 

37 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

You are absolutely correct - how dare Tibs get your giants confused?

 

21546932-7732061-image-a-67_157488160122

 

 

 

 

 

That’s a “POS of American history” 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tiberius said:

I’m wrong about what? 

 

You are not not making sense. Are you telling me that it’s a  fact  that “Thomas is a giant of American history” ? 

 

Seriously? 

Tibs, I’m not responsible for the thoughts or perception in your head.  You have to work that out.   
 

You were wrong when you suggested my opinion of Clarence Thomas is based on political bias.   You were wrong about my thoughts on affirmative action.  
 

If you skipped all the posturing and just got to the point you were trying to make, we could have saved a lot of time.  That’s why when you said you didn’t think he was, my response was “Oh, ok.”. 
 

What I meant by that was, “Oh, ok.”.   I understood that you were stating your opinion.  I was just surprised as you seemed not to have an opinion on the inspiration thing, but have very specific thoughts on the giant of history thing. 
 

It’s not a big deal.   I don’t have any plans for a ceremony or trophy or anything.  I just replied to a thread about him. 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Tibs, I’m not responsible for the thoughts or perception in your head.  You have to work that out.   
 

You were wrong when you suggested my opinion of Clarence Thomas is based on political bias.   You were wrong about my thoughts on affirmative action.  
 

If you skipped all the posturing and just got to the point you were trying to make, we could have saved a lot of time.  That’s why when you said you didn’t think he was, my response was “Oh, ok.”. 
 

What I meant by that was, “Oh, ok.”.   I understood that you were stating your opinion.  I was just surprised as you seemed not to have an opinion on the inspiration thing, but have very specific thoughts on the giant of history thing. 
 

It’s not a big deal.   I don’t have any plans for a ceremony or trophy or anything.  I just replied to a thread about him. 

 

 

 

Cool 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Silverman isn't the only one suggesting forming a military coup to overthrow the government.  In July 2017, Former adviser to President Barack Obama, Rosa Brooks, penned a column for Foreign Policy magazine titled "3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020." In it, she mentioned military coup as an option.

 

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/30/3-ways-to-get-rid-of-president-trump-before-2020-impeach-25th-amendment-coup/

 

 

 

They actually followed through.  

 

It was called Covid-19.  Everyone remember that?  Good times good times.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You are not the only one looking forward to it 

 

 

This guy is a clown. An embarrassment to this great country. He can barely speak yet he’s so revered on the international scene? Lol, yeah right. They’re laughing at him, not with him. 
 

The grift is back!

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Westside said:

Well, considering all the BS the left spewed about the president being a Russian stooge, I find it hard to believe anything they come up with. 
 

Be honest, the only reason you want him to retire is you don’t agree with his politics. Let’s get another partisan judge with less than stellar qualifications to spread their partisan BS policies.

Looks like the assclown is back with the thumbs down again. What a physo.

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Westside said:

This guy is a clown. An embarrassment to this great country. He can barely speak yet he’s so revered on the international scene? Lol, yeah right. They’re laughing at him, not with him. 
 

The grift is back!


👆🤡👇 no I

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg
 

And do you even know what grift means? 
 

Idiots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BillStime said:


👆🤡👇 no I

 

image.thumb.jpeg.1fdbe85a7d335fa55860c0d21ab88b52.jpeg
 

And do you even know what grift means? 
 

Idiots

You’d done pretty well for the last day or so…but now back to name calling. I liked yesterday’s BillStime way way better. You can do it!  👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only question left is can the democratic congress push through an asian trans justice through in a few weeks time like the republicans pushed through the handmaiden?  Why can't we just get someone normal from the center?????

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t know. I think Clarence had a clearance. 

54 minutes ago, daz28 said:

Nice fresh sliced medallions, not those cryovac ones that you gotta smash to death with a mallet.  


So loin medallions?   I remember the first time I butchered a leg of Veal.  All I could smell was milk.  You are what you eat. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2022 at 8:41 PM, BillStime said:


Or your father hiring his daughter and son in law in positions with absolutely no experience…. And that same daughter receiving numerous patents/trademarks from China while her Daddy is POTUS; and that same couple making over $640,000,000 while working at the WH and the son in law securing more than $3,000,000,000 in funding from international investors for his new investment firm.

 

We won’t even remind you how much Trump spent golfing and traveling to his properties or forcing the government to spend money at his properties here and abroad…

 

Yeah - Hunters laptop. 
 

Idiots 

 

If you would please share the items to which those patents & trademarks are on so i can avoid buying any more Chinese BS & while your at it give us the names of the investment firms so i can avoid anything to do with them also I don't want to be affiliated with any wrong doings by these people !

 

Seeing as you have all this info you can give it to me so i can not waste any time in doing the research seeing as you already have & i can stop buying any products from these crooked bastards . 

 

I'll thank you ahead of time for your reply . Thanks !! 

16 hours ago, Albwan said:

What a stupid post.

 

Is there any married man that isn't conflicted in some way shape or form ? Just another brilliant question given little or no fore thought before putting it out there ...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, B-Man said:

DEMOCRATS ARE PARTYING LIKE IT’S 1859: 

 

In Fit of Racially Charged Outrage, Democrats Target Supreme Court’s Only Black Justice for Impeachment.

 

Party’s ugly segregationist past resurfaces as prominent interracial couple comes under attack

 

 

 

 

https://freebeacon.com/parody/clarence-thomas-impeachment/

 

 

 

This is the same justice whose wife wanted to overturn a democratic election and have our choice, our elected president, thrown in jail? 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, T master said:

 

If you would please share the items to which those patents & trademarks are on so i can avoid buying any more Chinese BS & while your at it give us the names of the investment firms so i can avoid anything to do with them also I don't want to be affiliated with any wrong doings by these people !

 

Seeing as you have all this info you can give it to me so i can not waste any time in doing the research seeing as you already have & i can stop buying any products from these crooked bastards . 

 

I'll thank you ahead of time for your reply . Thanks !! 

 

Is there any married man that isn't conflicted in some way shape or form ? Just another brilliant question given little or no fore thought before putting it out there ...

 

You're asking @BillStime to produce receipts?

 

:lol:

 

Good one.

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DRsGhost said:

 

You're asking @BillStime to produce receipts?

 

:lol:

 

Good one.

 

HA! You can't handle receipts unless they come from Julie, Jason and Hans...

 

See? Threatened... attacking me cause I went right after his brand... his pathetic Twitter account.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

HA! You can't handle receipts unless they come from Julie, Jason and Hans...

 

See? Threatened... attacking me cause I went right after his brand... his pathetic Twitter account.

 

 

Well you still haven't told me what they are could it be because your still just spewing BS because of what we have all seen to be the hate you have instead of the truth of the matter ?

 

Because you sure won't stand up against those things that have changed for the worst in the last year plus and you still decide to live in the "Trumps a A Hole" mind set instead of being a unbiased American and calling out what is being done to hurt the US by all those concerned in power now when it comes to ignorant policy changes .

 

So i'll be waiting because if it is as you have said it is i want to know about these particular products because i acting in a unbiased way will no longer buy them no matter who is making profit from them . I know it won't be much but it's what i can do instead of B**CH about it & blame some one else for it like you !! 

Edited by T master
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, T master said:

 

Well you still haven't told me what they are could it be because your still just spewing BS because of what we have all seen to be the hate you have instead of the truth of the matter ?

 

Because you sure won't stand up against those things that have changed for the worst in the last year plus and you still decide to live in the "Trumps a A Hole" mind set instead of being a unbiased American and calling out what is being done to hurt the US by all those concerned when it comes to being ignorant .

 

So i'll be waiting because if it is as you have said it is i want to know about these particular products because i acting in a unbiased way will no longer buy them no matter who is making profit from them . I know it won't be much but it's what i can do instead of B**CH about it & blame some one else for it like you !! 

 

Go do your own homework and report back...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...