Jump to content

Could Bills Trade Up To #1 For Pass Rusher? Picks and Rousseau For #1?


jwhit34

Draft Day Trade Up To #1 Overall Pick To Draft Aidan Hutchinson  

223 members have voted

  1. 1. If the following trade was proposed: The Bills 1st and 2nd picks in '22 draft and Greg Rousseau, would you:

    • Agree to the trade if you were the Bills
      42
    • Decline the trade if you were the Bills
      136
    • Agree to the trade if you're the Jags
      13
    • Decline the trade if you're the Jags
      65


Recommended Posts

Unrealistic question, it would take a lot more than this to trade to #1 (try like three 1sts & 2nds) to go from 25 to 1. The question is would you be willing to trade all of that for a swing at 1 player who may or may not pan out & will take a few years to develop, while our Superbowl window is open now. It's a no brainer the answer is no. & Beane isn't going to do it. So let's stop with the silly questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you land Hutchinson, but would possibly have to give up more than the 25th overall and a 2nd,in addition to Rosseau.  Keep in mind,every time you trade multiple picks you are missing an opportunity to fix another position. Would a starting  CB at 25 for example, be a better OVERALL plan?

Edited by Georgie
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Georgie said:

So you land Hutchinson, but would possibly have to give up more than the 25th overall and a 2nd,in addition to Rosseau.  Keep in mind,every time you trade multiple picks you are missing an opportunity to fix another position. Would a starting  CB at 25 for example, be a better OVERALL plan?

 

Or swing the 1st round pick for a known starter at CB? Sounds crazy, but Beane did it for a #1 WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ThurmanThomasEnglishMuffin said:

 

Or swing the 1st round pick for a known starter at CB? Sounds crazy, but Beane did it for a #1 WR.

I think people forget it wasn't just a 1st rnd pick. It was also a 4,5 and 6. That would be a lot to give up under our current situation. I'm not arguing that flipping a 1st for a starting CB isn't an option, but do you have someone in mind and would that team be willing? Serious question as I haven't looked into it at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP was throwing crap up on a chat room wall to see if the idea indeed would have any traction amongst the brethren of 2BD

 

The answer to that is a flat NOPE

 

If someone who rarely posts does, and it's bad, its a bad idea and u scroll on past just like any other thread that doesnt interest you.

 

I mean for our Bills this frankly offseason already. 8 pages in hmm okay....  OP Novice attempt. Go easy on him now ;-)-m

 

#piffle

Edited by muppy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, muppy said:

OP was throwing crap up on a chat room wall to see if the idea indeed would have any traction amongst the brethren of 1BD

 

The answer to that is a flat NOPE

 

If someone whom rarely posts does, and it's bad, its a bad idea and u scroll on past just like any other thread that doesnt interest you.

 

I mean for our Bills this frankly offseason already. 8 pages in hmm okay....  OP Novice attempt. Go easy on him now ;-)-m

 

#piffle

If someone *who* rarely posts

 

Nominative case.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

I think people forget it wasn't just a 1st rnd pick. It was also a 4,5 and 6. That would be a lot to give up under our current situation. I'm not arguing that flipping a 1st for a starting CB isn't an option, but do you have someone in mind and would that team be willing? Serious question as I haven't looked into it at all.

 

Oh yeah, it may be a package, but our Bills are in win now mode. I would look at teams in cap trouble or rebuilding. Marshawn Lattimore fits 2/3 of those requirements, but his contract is a mess. I haven't gone team by team yet, just throwing out the idea that trading a 1st (and other pics/ player) may be an option this year, and CB is a real need IMO.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

I think people forget it wasn't just a 1st rnd pick. It was also a 4,5 and 6. That would be a lot to give up under our current situation. I'm not arguing that flipping a 1st for a starting CB isn't an option, but do you have someone in mind and would that team be willing? Serious question as I haven't looked into it at all.

 

This year, giving up a 4th+5th+6th gets us from pick 25 to pick.....20.  

 

But as for a lot to give up in our situation, how?  We are in a great roster situation where we can afford the luxury of going BPA.  Minor holes can be filled with FA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 1ManRaid said:

 

This year, giving up a 4th+5th+6th gets us from pick 25 to pick.....20.  

 

But as for a lot to give up in our situation, how?  We are in a great roster situation where we can afford the luxury of going BPA.  Minor holes can be filled with FA.

I wasn't looking at it as moving up in the 1st rnd. I was looking at losing 3 lower cost players. For example, That 4, could get you a decent RB, 5 could get you another oline and 6 could get you a good depth player or even a really good punter. LOL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ThurmanThomasEnglishMuffin said:

 

Oh yeah, it may be a package, but our Bills are in win now mode. I would look at teams in cap trouble or rebuilding. Marshawn Lattimore fits 2/3 of those requirements, but his contract is a mess. I haven't gone team by team yet, just throwing out the idea that trading a 1st (and other pics/ player) may be an option this year, and CB is a real need IMO.

One critical component of the Diggs trade was that he wanted out of Minnesota.  That’s the reason the Bills got a player of his caliber on a reasonable contract for what they did.

 

I don’t have an issue trading for a CB in theory, but I’m looking for a fit unless a rare Diggs-like situation pops up.  We can’t take on a bad contract so thats out.  A second or third tier CB on an expiring contract would be an option, but we could just sign one of those for the contract we’d give one we’d trade for.  Don’t see that happening.

 

I think we’re seeing what FA brings and then looking to the draft.  Expect at least one in each. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/9/2022 at 11:31 AM, 1ManRaid said:

Holy crap you GREATLY underestimate how much it would cost to move up 20+ spots in the first round to #1 overall.  Need to throw in a couple more 1st and 2nd rounders at least, especially considering our low draft slots.  Our 2nd rounder + Rousseau probably wouldn't get us to the top 10, and it only gets exponentially more expensive from there.

Its almost impossible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LyndonvilleBill said:

I wasn't looking at it as moving up in the 1st rnd. I was looking at losing 3 lower cost players. For example, That 4, could get you a decent RB, 5 could get you another oline and 6 could get you a good depth player or even a really good punter. LOL. 

 

Sorry I meant to highlight comparative value of a trade of 1st/4th/5th/6th for a player.  I'd gladly give up a #20 pick for a player like Diggs and fill the others with cheap FAs or trade down a 2nd for midrounders. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a very specific reason to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...