The American Media Should Not Be Trusted

[Backintheday544]

3 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

Same as it ever was..............

 

 

 

 

Boom right wing opinion about your posts:

 

Why, so you can continue to flood this message board with every nonsensical piece of garbage you harvest out of the Twitter sphere? You don’t think people can go on Twitter and read this crap for themselves? Copying and pasting is NOT the purpose of a message board. Try offering something of value, or a slightly well reasoned adult worthy opinion once in a while and you’ll watch my standard bored to death response change. Ready, set, go! “

[BillStime]

They really do think the cult is stupid.  So f'n pathetic:

 

 

[plenzmd1]

Does it bother you that your network lied?   “ they shouldn’t have done that”

 

 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

6 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

Does it bother you that your network lied?   “ they shouldn’t have done that”

 

 

Rogan went ground and pound here with Dr. G.  When the good doc tried to stand up and laugh it off, Rogan persisted, returned him to the mat, and commenced to wearing him down.  When Dr G tried to blame the feds, Rogan returned to his actions and the actions of the networks.  He would not be deterred. 
 

Rogan “I can afford people medicine, m#$&$#-f&$#@er!”. Classic, and the Doc never quite could convince himself to acknowledge the lie.  

[plenzmd1]

1 minute ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Rogan went ground and pound here with Dr. G.  When the good doc tried to stand up and laugh it off, Rogan persisted, returned him to the mat, and commenced to wearing him down.  When Dr G tried to blame the feds, Rogan returned to his actions and the actions of the networks.  He would not be deterred. 
 

Rogan “I can afford people medicine, m#$&$#-f&$#@er!”. Classic, and the Doc never quite could convince himself to acknowledge the lie.  

It is amazing to anyone paying attention. You have this and the Couric thing in the same day, and people still want to trust the MSM , they believe these are isolated incidents. 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

49 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

It is amazing to anyone paying attention. You have this and the Couric thing in the same day, and people still want to trust the MSM , they believe these are isolated incidents. 

I was going to mention the Couric thing.  
 

RBG, whether one agrees with her politics or not, is one of the giants of American history.  Her story is incredible and while she obviously stayed on too long, her place in history is secure (unless future generations choose to change it of course). 
 

Katie Couric is an accomplished and successful person.  I don’t doubt her intellect, tenacity and based on recent stories, her willingness to crush anyone or anything in her way.  At the same time, she’s famous for being able to listen to the voices in the earbud, recite scripts on a teleprompter and do so in a manner that appeals to a large segment of the population. 
 

To think she felt compelled to protect and censor RGB to save her is outrageous. In a time when we needed voices to be heard, and dialogue, she chose to become the arbiter of what people should hear.   Katie Couric is a footnote  in the pages of history, replaced and replaceable with another talking head in short order.  
 

Then again, I believe it was Couric who manipulated the 911 call from Geo Zimmerman to change the context of the conversation and wrote it off as a time saver. 
 

 

[Doc]

Good for Rogan.  The same idiots did the same thing for HCQ.  Their agenda is clear.

[Orlando Tim]

56 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I was going to mention the Couric thing.  
 

RBG, whether one agrees with her politics or not, is one of the giants of American history.  Her story is incredible and while she obviously stayed on too long, her place in history is secure (unless future generations choose to change it of course). 
 

Katie Couric is an accomplished and successful person.  I don’t doubt her intellect, tenacity and based on recent stories, her willingness to crush anyone or anything in her way.  At the same time, she’s famous for being able to listen to the voices in the earbud, recite scripts on a teleprompter and do so in a manner that appeals to a large segment of the population. 
 

To think she felt compelled to protect and censor RGB to save her is outrageous. In a time when we needed voices to be heard, and dialogue, she chose to become the arbiter of what people should hear.   Katie Couric is a footnote  in the pages of history, replaced and replaceable with another talking head in short order.  
 

Then again, I believe it was Couric who manipulated the 911 call from Geo Zimmerman to change the context of the conversation and wrote it off as a time saver. 
 

 

Can you imagine Couric censoring Trump to make him more palatable? The sad part is she censored RBG because on the left you are pure or you are garbage and RBG despite all the good she did was going to be garbage 

[Doc]

I can't trust anything anyone says anymore.  It's beyond sad.

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

2 hours ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

Can you imagine Couric censoring Trump to make him more palatable? The sad part is she censored RBG because on the left you are pure or you are garbage and RBG despite all the good she did was going to be garbage 

Tim, while I’m a conservative leaning fellow but I don’t like to characterize things in that way. I get what you’re saying and from certain perspectives that’s probably true. 
 

I recall Savannah Guthrie interviewing Trump early on in the race and she pointed out how poorly he was doing in a poll and asked him about it.  He replied that a very recent NBC poll had him leading the field and wondered why she didn’t mention that?  She was flummoxed and stuttered some answer.  He called her on her bs and that’s the best course of action to follow imo. 
 

I think we both agree you have to consider the source and the agenda.  I think most reasonable lefty folk would agree as well. 

[muppy]

Just now, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Tim, while I’m a conservative leaning fellow but I don’t like to characterize things in that way. I get what you’re saying and from certain perspectives that’s probably true. 
 

I recall Savannah Guthrie interviewing Trump early on in the race and she pointed out how poorly he was doing in a poll and asked him about it.  He replied that a very recent NBC poll had him leading the field and wondered why she didn’t mention that?  She was flummoxed and stuttered some answer.  He called her on her bs and that’s the best course of action to follow imo. 
 

I think we both agree you have to consider the source and the agenda.  I think most reasonable lefty folk would agree as well. 

looking in on my buddy leonardo. come up for air and visit me in the football threads homey :-)))

 

m

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

10 minutes ago, Muppy said:

looking in on my buddy leonardo. come up for air and visit me in the football threads homey :-)))

 

m

I spend quite a bit of time there but I'm most definitely not an X and O guy.  I try and read folks who are (or seem to be).  I've also become a company man here--I trust Beane and McD to make choices, I don't worry a lick about salary cap, who gets paid or extended, or the play on a particular player.  So, while I read the Edmunds post for example, my sense is that TE is viewed as  very good player by the brain trust for the role he is expected to play.  Stepping back a bit, the Bills have won 19 out of the last 24 games, made it to the AFC Championship and are fun to watch.   I also am becoming a bit more emotional as I get older, I don't want to talk about guys who someone thinks stink, or who should be benched, it seems unproductive and mean-spirited. 

 

These are good damn times for the Bills faithful, and SB or not, I'm going to try and enjoy them.*

 

I will though, mock your love of Barry Manilow music and your collection of Michael Bolton vintage vinyl if you like. 

 

Peace friend.

 

*The other night, after what seemed like the 15th penalty of the first quarter on the Bills, I said to my son "This game's over." He's a much more rational fan and assured me it wasn't.  I'm a work in progress for sure. 

 

 

 

 

[muppy]

3 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I spend quite a bit of time there but I'm most definitely not an X and O guy.  I try and read folks who are (or seem to be).  I've also become a company man here--I trust Beane and McD to make choices, I don't worry a lick about salary cap, who gets paid or extended, or the play on a particular player.  So, while I read the Edmunds post for example, my sense is that TE is viewed as  very good player by the brain trust for the role he is expected to play.  Stepping back a bit, the Bills have won 19 out of the last 24 games, made it to the AFC Championship and are fun to watch.   I also am becoming a bit more emotional as I get older, I don't want to talk about guys who someone thinks stink, or who should be benched, it seems unproductive and mean-spirited. 

 

These are good damn times for the Bills faithful, and SB or not, I'm going to try and enjoy them.*

 

I will though, mock your love of Barry Manilow music and your collection of Michael Bolton vintage vinyl if you like. 

 

Peace friend.

 

*The other night, after what seemed like the 15th penalty of the first quarter on the Bills, I said to my son "This game's over." He's a much more rational fan and assured me it wasn't.  I'm a work in progress for sure. 

 

 

 

 

blah blah blah blah Blah blah blah 

 

ahem..barry manilow? Now That was LOW homey.......Michael Bolton Vintage bwaahahaahaa

 

LOL I luv u man :-))))) #Truth

 

I only snark at folks who can take it I'll cya around GO BILLS!~!~!~!!!!

 

m

Edited October 14, 2021 by Muppy

[muppy]

..Eat yer heart out BARRY

 

lmaoooo

 

@leh-nerd skin-erd 

[leh-nerd skin-erd]

41 minutes ago, Muppy said:

..Eat yer heart out BARRY

 

lmaoooo

 

@leh-nerd skin-erd 

Guy has pipes, you have to give it to him. 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE NARRATIVE: 

 

Network blackout on ‘gender fluid’ rape claim in Loudoun school.

 

 

Any mention of Loudoun is about the "protest", not about the bathroom.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/network-blackout-on-gender-fluid-rape-claim-in-loudoun-school

[JaCrispy]

10 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE NARRATIVE: 

 

Network blackout on ‘gender fluid’ rape claim in Loudoun school.

 

 

Any mention of Loudoun is about the "protest", not about the bathroom.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/washington-secrets/network-blackout-on-gender-fluid-rape-claim-in-loudoun-school

Very similar to alternative covid medicines or negative info on the vaccines...can’t have people knowing the full story...and everything needs to be spun against white MAGA country...As BillStime likes to often say- pathetic...👍

 

”Welcome to the rebellion!”

Edited October 17, 2021 by JaCrispy

[B-Man]

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Tiberius]

11 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

America's capitalist media cannot be trusted! 

 

--V. Putin 

[All_Pro_Bills]

51 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

America's capitalist media cannot be trusted! 

 

--V. Putin 

Unfortunately for us Putin is running laps around Biden & his clown show while always seeming to be 5 moves ahead.  

[Orlando Tim]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

America's capitalist media cannot be trusted! 

 

--V. Putin 

So you think Americans should lower there expectations of standard of living? If not what was point of this post?

[Tiberius]

3 minutes ago, Buffalo Timmy said:

So you think Americans should lower there expectations of standard of living? If not what was point of this post?

What? No, just pointing out how you guys are like the useful idiots that supported communism 

19 minutes ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Unfortunately for us Putin is running laps around Biden & his clown show while always seeming to be 5 moves ahead.  

Of course you think their system is better than our system 

[B-Man]

 

 

So did you get that PPP ?

 

Quoting the Washington Post trying to discourage American's expectations

 

 

 

 

Doing that is somehow support for Putin and communism in Tiberius's tiny little mind.

 

 

Leftist's claim to be for truth, but when YOU point out where the media is using propaganda, that must be attacked.

 

Tibsy is a tool of the left.

 

 

 

 

[Tiberius]

5 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

So did you get that PPP ?

 

Quoting the Washington Post trying to discourage American's expectations

 

 

 

 

Doing that is somehow support for Putin and communism in Tiberius's tiny little mind.

 

 

Leftist's claim to be for truth, but when YOU point out where the media is using propaganda, that must be attacked.

 

Tibsy is a tool of the left.

 

 

 

 

Oh, you poor anti-American little troll. It's all so confusing to you. 

[Doc]

28 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

So did you get that PPP ?

 

Quoting the Washington Post trying to discourage American's expectations

 

 

 

 

Doing that is somehow support for Putin and communism in Tiberius's tiny little mind.

 

 

Leftist's claim to be for truth, but when YOU point out where the media is using propaganda, that must be attacked.

 

Tibsy is a tool of the left.

 

When Dems are running the show, it truly is a good idea to lower your expectations...

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

Of course you think their system is better than our system 

Your misrepresenting my view.  I'm making no judgment about any system.  I simply think Putin is a lot smarter than Biden and whether you like it or not has a holistic and coordinated master plan for the Russian state while Biden is fiddling around with social justice issues at the expense of all else. 

Your conclusion of my assessment that Putin is a better leader than Biden is consistent with saying I'm a Titans fan because I think Derrick Henry is a better RB than the Bills Singletary or Moss.  

[BillStime]

1 hour ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Your misrepresenting my view.  I'm making no judgment about any system.  I simply think Putin is a lot smarter than Biden and whether you like it or not has a holistic and coordinated master plan for the Russian state while Biden is fiddling around with social justice issues at the expense of all else. 

Your conclusion of my assessment that Putin is a better leader than Biden is consistent with saying I'm a Titans fan because I think Derrick Henry is a better RB than the Bills Singletary or Moss.  

 

Social justice issues? LMAO - of course the number 1 PPP hack forgets all the times Trump called for boycotts: Colin Kaerpernick | NFL | MLB | Macys | ATT | Megan Kelly | Harley | Oreos | Whiskey | Apple | Twitter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[B-Man]

 

 

 

REPORTERS DON’T ROOT FOR A SIDE. PERIOD:

 

 

 

 

 

[BillStime]

 

[Beach]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Social justice issues? LMAO - of course the number 1 PPP hack forgets all the times Trump called for boycotts: Colin Kaerpernick | NFL | MLB | Macys | ATT | Megan Kelly | Harley | Oreos | Whiskey | Apple | Twitter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

boycotting something you dont like is fine, calling for something you dont like to be removed or canceled is ridiculous 

[All_Pro_Bills]

1 hour ago, BillStime said:

 

Social justice issues? LMAO - of course the number 1 PPP hack forgets all the times Trump called for boycotts: Colin Kaerpernick | NFL | MLB | Macys | ATT | Megan Kelly | Harley | Oreos | Whiskey | Apple | Twitter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apples and oranges.  The difference is the left uses the power and force of the government to strongarm anyone that disagrees.  I don't remember Trump sending the DOJ or the FBI after shoppers that still frequented Macy's.  I also don't recall any actions to use Federal law enforcement to silence or punish Kaepernick.  Or enact legislation to punish the NFL.  He expressed his views and it was voluntary and left to the individual if they wanted to follow his led.   

But Garland is good with using the DOJ against parents wanting a say in schools.  And Obama was okay with sending the IRS after organizations that disagreed with his political views.  Or using their friends in social media to block and delete information that contradicts or opposes their views.     

[BillStime]

2 hours ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

Apples and oranges.  The difference is the left uses the power and force of the government to strongarm anyone that disagrees.  I don't remember Trump sending the DOJ or the FBI after shoppers that still frequented Macy's.  I also don't recall any actions to use Federal law enforcement to silence or punish Kaepernick.  Or enact legislation to punish the NFL.  He expressed his views and it was voluntary and left to the individual if they wanted to follow his led.   

But Garland is good with using the DOJ against parents wanting a say in schools.  And Obama was okay with sending the IRS after organizations that disagreed with his political views.  Or using their friends in social media to block and delete information that contradicts or opposes their views.     

 

The left uses power and force of the government to strong arm? LMAO - you are such a clueless hack - it is hysterical.  You one up your self EVERY SINGLE DAY - how is that possible?

• Who used social media and rallies to fan the flames with social justice issues?
• Who used the DOJ to seize phone records of reporters?
• Who used the power of the presidency to beg the DOJ to join his Big Lie campaign?
• Who used the power of the presidency to pressure Republican state officials to find just enough votes?
• Who used the the National Park Police, National Guard, local police officers and the Secret Service to tear-gas peaceful protestors for a photo op?
• Who used the power of the presidency to reject transgendered American patriots serving in our military?
• Who used and supported a private entrepreneur who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple?
  • And now these same people - (ie. YOU) - are upset that private (social media) companies flag, delete and ban users who break TOS.
    • Hypocrites at their finest.
• Who used his bully pulpit to absolutely destroy Kaepernick's career for political purposes?
  • Because we all know someone who has zero respect for the highest office of the land and pisses all over his oath has no issue using social issues to destroy someone's career.

Now, for the absolutely BEST PART of your ARGUMENT - you are literally "fiddling around with social justice issues" to make an incredibly poor argument...

 

Tell us - how exactly is GARLAND USING THE DOJ AGAINST PARENTS WANTING A SAY IN SCHOOLS?  And while you fumble the ball again trying to explain it - please tell us why you left out the part of Garland investigating parents who are TERRORIZING school board members.  Also, please elaborate on the Charlie Kirk/dark money groups inciting violence using SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES (CRT/TRANS/MASKs, ETC) to attack these boards?  Don't forget to share your sources who are literally using SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES to incite your ignorance.

 

Once a hack - always a hack.

Edited October 19, 2021 by BillStime

[All_Pro_Bills]

36 minutes ago, BillStime said:

 

The left uses power and force of the government to strong arm? LMAO - you are such a clueless hack - it is hysterical.  You one up your self EVERY SINGLE DAY - how is that possible?

• Who used social media and rallies to fan the flames with social justice issues?
• Who used the DOJ to seize phone records of reporters?
• Who used the power of the presidency to beg the DOJ to join his Big Lie campaign?
• Who used the power of the presidency to pressure Republican state officials to find just enough votes?
• Who used the the National Park Police, National Guard, local police officers and the Secret Service to tear-gas peaceful protestors for a photo op?
• Who used the power of the presidency reject transgendered American patriots serving in our military?
• Who used and supported a private entrepreneur who refused to make a wedding cake for a gay couple?
  • And now these same people - (ie. YOU) - are upset that private (social media companies) flag, delete and ban users who break TOS.
    • Hypocrites at their finest.
• Who used his bully pulpit to absolutely destroy Kaepernick's career for political purposes?
  • Because we all know someone who has zero respect for the highest office of the land and pisses all over his oath has no issue using social issues to destroy someone's career.

Now, for the absolutely BEST PART of your ARGUMENT - you are literally "fiddling around with social justice issues" to make an incredibly poor argument...

 

Tell us - how exactly is GARLAND USING THE DOJ AGAINST PARENTS WANTING A SAY IN SCHOOLS?  And while you fumble the ball again trying to explain it - please tell us why you left out the part of Garlands investigating parents who are TERRORIZING school board members.  Also, please elaborate on the Charlie Kirk/dark money groups inciting violence using SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES (CRT/TRANS/MASKs, ETC) to attack these boards?  Don't forget to share your sources who are literally using SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUES to incite your ignorance.

 

Once a hack - always a hack.

I'm not sure where you're going with this.  The administration is weaponizing various Federal agencies against their political enemies.  And colluding with tech giants to do so. Government and corporate combined in fascism.  If you don't condemn it your a fascist too.

Terrorizing school boards?  They're punk weaklings that can't take the heat.  You make it sound like rioters are dragging out and beating school board members.  Get real.  Stop the drama.  They peddle all kinds of crap on defenseless and easy to push around children but when challenged by adults they want to hide and pretend it doesn't exist.  Cowards can't stand a public debate because they're views are ridiculously idiotic.  So they hide.  And want Big Brother to protect them.  Can't fight their own battles.  Typical leftists who prefer to hide behind the nanny state's skirt rather than do their own fighting.  Eventually that's why the left will lose this battle.  Because at the end of the day they won't risk their own asses for their ideology.  Which speaks poorly of their true level of conviction.

Edited October 19, 2021 by All_Pro_Bills

[BillStime]

1 minute ago, All_Pro_Bills said:

I'm not sure where you're going with this.  The administration is weaponizing various Federal agencies against their political enemies.  And colluding with tech giants to do so. Government and corporate combined in fascism.  If you don't condemn it your a fascist too.

Terrorizing school boards?  They're punk weaklings that can't take the heat.  You make it sound like rioters are dragging out and beating school board members.  Get real.  Stop the drama.  They peddle all kinds of crap on defenseless and easy to push around children but when challenged by adults they want to hide and pretend it doesn't exist.  Cowards can't stand a public debate because they're views are ridiculously idiotic.  So they hide.  And want Big Brother to protect them.  Can't fight their own battles.  Typical leftists who prefer to hide behind the nanny state's skirt rather than do their own fighting.

 

Act like what? This was YOUR argument about parents - a right wing pumped fallacy you couldn’t find a single source to support your Garland argument.

 

Just like you can’t source Biden's weaponization of federal agencies - against who?  
 

Just like you ignored every fact that the Trump administration weaponized every department for Trumps benefit.
 

You are just the type Trump can’t survive without.

 

And don’t talk to me about an administration colluding with social media companies like Jesus Trump did  last fall w Zuckerberg before Trump went all Putin on 1/6 and got bounced.

 

Mark Zuckerberg ‘struck deal with Donald Trump to avoid regulations’ on Facebook

 

Hackers gonna hack - and what a pathetic hack you are.

 

Can’t wait for tomorrow’s edition of faux outrage and hypocrisy - all pro style.

[Doc]

The Dems are the party of cancel-culture and safe spaces.  This is not even up for debate.  Cancel culture means eliminating something, not merely boycotting it.  And safe spaces are a way to run away from things.  You think China, Russia, North Korea, etc. have this pervading their culture?  Hell even France was laughing at us for it.  France!

[BillStime]

4 minutes ago, Doc said:

The Dems are the party of cancel-culture and safe spaces.  This is not even up for debate.  Cancel culture means eliminating something, not merely boycotting it.  And safe spaces are a way to run away from things.  You think China, Russia, North Korea, etc. have this pervading their culture?  Hell even France was laughing at us for it.  France!

 

Irony is dead

 

https://www.billsfans.com/

 

[Doc]

11 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Irony is dead

 

https://www.billsfans.com/

 

 

That's because they were getting cancelled here.  They otherwise would have waited-it-out because the lib takeover here right after Joey won has all but died out.  You're basically it...and failing miserably.

[BillStime]

2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

That's because they were getting cancelled here.  They otherwise would have waited-it-out because the lib takeover here right after Joey won has all but died out.  You're basically it...and failing miserably.

Hysterical - your deranged frat train got bounced and all you good little lemmings created a safe place for him to keep you programmed and aligned.

 

 

 

[Doc]

4 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Hysterical - your deranged frat train got bounced and all you good little lemmings created a safe place for him to keep you programmed and aligned.

 

This makes no sense.  But no surprise.

[BillStime]

2 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

This makes no sense.  But no surprise.

 

Sure.