Jump to content

Random Political Thoughts Inc.


T&C

Recommended Posts

Republicans can add “Dr. Seuss books” to their ever-growing list of “things they live in daily paralyzing fear of” apparently 

 

 

Republicans are just such sad, angry little people. Banning The Sneeches because it hurts their feelings (even though the kids loved it..). 

  • Eyeroll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Republicans can add “Dr. Seuss books” to their ever-growing list of “things they live in daily paralyzing fear of” apparently 

 

 

Republicans are just such sad, angry little people. Banning The Sneeches because it hurts their feelings (even though the kids loved it..). 


Huh?  The third grader is a Republican?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Doc said:


Huh?  The third grader is a Republican?

 

 

The funny part is that Roundy actually thinks that the school administrator who objected was a conservative.

 

She must be, because Republicans in other states are suppressing speech.

 

At least that's the Daily Kos take.

 

All the stories explain what happened, but THE NARRATIVE take is what we must spread.

 

What a buffoon !

 

😂

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

The funny part is that Roundy actually thinks that the school administrator who objected was a conservative.

 

She must be, because Republicans in other states are suppressing speech.

 

At least that's the Daily Kos take.

 

All the stories explain what happened, but THE NARRATIVE take is what we must spread.

 

What a buffoon !

 

😂

 

That ("was the admin a Repub?") was going to be my second question if he replied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Roundybout said:

Republicans can add “Dr. Seuss books” to their ever-growing list of “things they live in daily paralyzing fear of” apparently 

 

 

Republicans are just such sad, angry little people. Banning The Sneeches because it hurts their feelings (even though the kids loved it..). 

Why do you believe she is a Republican? I am assuming you don't deal with many school administrators because the vast majority are liberal 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Roundybout said:

Republicans can add “Dr. Seuss books” to their ever-growing list of “things they live in daily paralyzing fear of” apparently 

 

 

Republicans are just such sad, angry little people. Banning The Sneeches because it hurts their feelings (even though the kids loved it..). 

LMAO. ITs like you just forgot when that librarian said Milania's donation of DR Suess was RACIST and the collective mob declared them racist and demanded them be removed from schools.  Short memory?

 

https://reason.com/2017/09/29/librarian-rejects-melania-trumps-dr-sues/

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/09/28/racist-propaganda-librarian-rejects-melania-trumps-gift-of-dr-seuss-books/

 

I still remember when the mob went at mark twain for Huck fin (and even kill a mockingbird) and demanded it be removed or changed.

 

https://mashable.com/article/book-ban-virginia#:~:text=To Kill a Mockingbird and The Adventures of,— a decision some are condemning as censorship.
 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, B-Man said:

 

 

The funny part is that Roundy actually thinks that the school administrator who objected was a conservative.

 

She must be, because Republicans in other states are suppressing speech.

 

At least that's the Daily Kos take.

 

All the stories explain what happened, but THE NARRATIVE take is what we must spread.

 

What a buffoon !

 

😂


Conservatives love banning books they don’t like. Look at Maus, for instance. Can’t have anything that makes you feel uncomfortable!

44 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

LMAO. ITs like you just forgot when that librarian said Milania's donation of DR Suess was RACIST and the collective mob declared them racist and demanded them be removed from schools.  Short memory?

 

https://reason.com/2017/09/29/librarian-rejects-melania-trumps-dr-sues/

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2017/09/28/racist-propaganda-librarian-rejects-melania-trumps-gift-of-dr-seuss-books/

 

I still remember when the mob went at mark twain for Huck fin (and even kill a mockingbird) and demanded it be removed or changed.

 

https://mashable.com/article/book-ban-virginia#:~:text=To Kill a Mockingbird and The Adventures of,— a decision some are condemning as censorship.
 


No book anywhere should be banned, period. 

2 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

Why do you believe she is a Republican? I am assuming you don't deal with many school administrators because the vast majority are liberal 


Because the sneeches is about racism and that makes republicans uncomfortable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


Conservatives love banning books they don’t like. Look at Maus, for instance. Can’t have anything that makes you feel uncomfortable!


No book anywhere should be banned, period. 


Because the sneeches is about racism and that makes republicans uncomfortable. 

Mobs/authoritarians love banning books.  

 

Some weirdos lately are championing pornography in libraries. thats just strange. but again, that seems to be a mob thing

 

I provided an example of when the LEFT wanted to and banned DR Suess.  and you still ran with "Conservatives."

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Conservatives love banning books they don’t like. Look at Maus, for instance. Can’t have anything that makes you feel uncomfortable!


No book anywhere should be banned, period. 


Because the sneeches is about racism and that makes republicans uncomfortable. 

 

So books that have pornography should be allowed in school libraries, is that what you're saying? 

 

And The Sneetches is broadly about classism, not just racism.

Edited by Doc
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

So books that have pornography should be allowed in school libraries, is that what you're saying? 

 

And The Sneetches is broadly about classism, not just racism.


This is such a strawman argument that it’s not worth my time. 

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

Mobs/authoritarians love banning books.  

 

Some weirdos lately are championing pornography in libraries. thats just strange. but again, that seems to be a mob thing

 

I provided an example of when the LEFT wanted to and banned DR Suess.  and you still ran with "Conservatives."

 

 


Another strawman. And yes, I said that banning books at all is wrong, illiberal, and unamerican. 

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

This is such a strawman argument that it’s not worth my time.

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Roundybout said:


Conservatives love banning books they don’t like. Look at Maus, for instance. Can’t have anything that makes you feel uncomfortable!


No book anywhere should be banned, period. 


Because the sneeches is about racism and that makes republicans uncomfortable. 

What kind of clown believes showing 5 year old sexual explicit pictures is appropriate? Seriously what is wrong with you?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

ITs whatever MSNBC says, then any deflection possible.

 

Its like some have no intention of organic replies and post. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Orlando Tim said:

What kind of clown believes showing 5 year old sexual explicit pictures is appropriate? Seriously what is wrong with you?

 

That is not happening anywhere. Grow up and touch grass.

7 hours ago, Doc said:

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

 

No school library anywhere is putting porn in its collection. Go outside. 

6 hours ago, Chris farley said:

ITs whatever MSNBC says, then any deflection possible.

 

Its like some have no intention of organic replies and post. 

 

 

 

Uh huh. 

  • Eyeroll 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roundybout said:

 

That is not happening anywhere. Grow up and touch grass.

 

No school library anywhere is putting porn in its collection. Go outside. 

 

Uh huh. 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11317925/amp/Shocking-footage-family-friendly-drag-queen-sees-performer-spreading-legs-kids.html

 

So this is a lie? Or is this not sexual? 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few weeks ago, I had dinner with some friends. One of them pulled out his phone and asked me if I thought I had written more than 200 pieces or so at this stage of my career. “Probably,” I said. “Why?”

Sign up for a weekly roundup of thought-provoking ideas and debates

“You know, the way things are going, artificial intelligence is going to be able to write articles and books just by analyzing your writing style.” I was initially incredulous, maybe a bit dismissive. Then my friend went to a program on his phone and put in a query, asking it to write a 1,000-word Christmas story in the style of Charles Dickens. To my amazement, the program started churning out paragraphs within seconds — and not just a jumble of random words. The grafs had sentence variation, color, plot development.

He did another query: Think of a title for a children’s holiday book aimed at a Black audience. Within seconds, a list populated — and the winner was something to the effect of “Zahra’s Big Holiday Surprise.” I was stunned.

 

I thought of that convo as the news came down this week that the popular electronics site CNET has been using AI to write full articles. Frank Landymore at the Byte documents how eagle-eyed marketer Gael Breton figured out that CNET had quietly published more than 70 articles using AI since November, under the author name “CNET Money Staff.” Clicking on the author’s note reveals the truth:

“This article was assisted by an AI engine and reviewed, fact-checked and edited by our editorial staff.”

On top of that, it appears these AI-generated articles have benefited from Google traffic, despite the fact that Google has said it will prioritize human-generated content. Landymore wrote that a Google spokesman had clarified, “Our ranking team focuses on the usefulness of content, rather than how the content is produced.”

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/01/13/ai-writers-performance-enhancing-steroid/

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

This is an interesting thought. 

More than interesting Tibs.  Even without Market Garden we had the upper hand.  Many soldiers of that time had the same opinion.  My father included.  Roosevelt sold out to the Russians when he could have crushed them.  Always said they could have marched right thru them.  I hope there was some good reasons.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/12/2023 at 10:19 AM, Doc said:

 

No, you just have no answer for it.  Not allowing certain books in school libraries is very different from banning books everywhere.  But if it plays into the left's hands, that's all you care about, isn't it?

 

Never mind that this was a terrible example.  Again the kid and probably the Admin weren't Republicans.

Keep em stupid and insulated:  https://pen.org/banned-books-florida/

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are Biden’s own personal attorneys going after him, after protecting him for so long?

 

Just in time for the next presidential run? Something isn’t adding up…

 

Originally Biden had said he wanted to run for re-election, even though polls showed that Democrat voters wanted something different…

 

Then, potential presidential hopeful Gavin Newsom said he would withdraw his bid for president in 2024, and throw his support to Biden…

 

Then, about a month ago Biden was caught on a hot mic suggesting he wasn’t sure about a run for re-election…

 

And now, his personal attorneys find classified documents being illegally held by Biden in various places…

 

Have the Dems made a “U-turn” on who they want to lead the Party in ‘24?  Have they decided to use this controversy to hurt Biden’s chances? Is this a distraction for bigger things going on behind the scenes?

 

If you are familiar with how the government works, this definitely has the smell of something fishy…stay tuned…😉

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JaCrispy said:

Why are Biden’s own personal attorneys going after him, after protecting him for so long?

 

Just in time for the next presidential run? Something isn’t adding up…

 

Originally Biden had said he wanted to run for re-election, even though polls showed that Democrat voters wanted something different…

 

Then, potential presidential hopeful Gavin Newsom said he would withdraw his bid for president in 2024, and throw his support to Biden…

 

Then, about a month ago Biden was caught on a hot mic suggesting he wasn’t sure about a run for re-election…

 

And now, his personal attorneys find classified documents being illegally held by Biden in various places…

 

Have the Dems made a “U-turn” on who they want to lead the Party in ‘24?  Have they decided to use this controversy to hurt Biden’s chances? Is this a distraction for bigger things going on behind the scenes?

 

If you are familiar with how the government works, this definitely has the smell of something fishy…stay tuned…😉

 

Yeah they sent his personal attorneys to move his stuff.  Because $1000/hour attorneys are the best movers.  :lol:

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, JaCrispy said:

Why are Biden’s own personal attorneys going after him, after protecting him for so long?

 

Just in time for the next presidential run? Something isn’t adding up…

 

Originally Biden had said he wanted to run for re-election, even though polls showed that Democrat voters wanted something different…

 

Then, potential presidential hopeful Gavin Newsom said he would withdraw his bid for president in 2024, and throw his support to Biden…

 

Then, about a month ago Biden was caught on a hot mic suggesting he wasn’t sure about a run for re-election…

 

And now, his personal attorneys find classified documents being illegally held by Biden in various places…

 

Have the Dems made a “U-turn” on who they want to lead the Party in ‘24?  Have they decided to use this controversy to hurt Biden’s chances? Is this a distraction for bigger things going on behind the scenes?

 

If you are familiar with how the government works, this definitely has the smell of something fishy…stay tuned…😉

 

They want Hakeem Jeffries.

 

14 hours ago, Doc said:

 

But is it art?

 

I think so. Do you?

Edited by reddogblitz
Correct stupid auto correct error.
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:


 

More fine GOP policies at work.

I'll take a stab:  poverty, drug abuse, poor education systems, corruption, less and worse health care (especially rural), vaccine hesitancy, obesity (poor food choices), smoking, rejection or misunderstanding of science, lax or nonexistent environmental laws, desperation.  btw, most of western NC and western Va are red and pink except progressive (and more affluent) areas like Asheville.

Edited by redtail hawk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

I'll take a stab:  poverty, drug abuse, poor education systems, corruption, less and worse health care (especially rural), vaccine hesitancy, obesity (poor food choices), smoking, rejection or misunderstanding of science, lax or nonexistent environmental laws, desperation.  btw, most of western NC and western Va are red and pink except progressive (and more affluent) areas like Asheville.

 

Rural poverty is extraordinarily difficult to solve. There's an excellent book I read on this called "Hollowing Out the Middle" by Patrick Carr that tries to address certain issues. A key problem is that rural schools are stratified; the smartest kids are given special benefits to go off to college and jobs in other towns, leaving those towns with low-skill people that can only succeed in increasingly sparce industrial jobs. 

Edited by Roundybout
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...