The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG

[Albwan]

 

 You can't tell but I am very sad and solemn about impeachment.

[Foxx]

 

https://twitter.com/JonathanTurley/status/1202681745038028806

 

[John Adams]

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

here, i'll show you what being jerky looks like... you know, just so you can get a 'shoe on the other foot perspective'.

 

should we get into your PM to me just prior to Thanksgiving trying to explain away your deletion of certain postings on the forum with regard to pedophilia?

 

If you want to talk about why you didn't go after the PPP pedo when he was here, feel free. 

 

You asked for evidence of me going after him and I responded, privately, but you now want to make that public. Talk about a crappy thing to do. But go ahead if it makes you feel better. I assumed a douche like you would threaten something like that.  

 

EDIT: Also, if you're going to "out" what I emailed you privately, at least get it right.

 

Quote

are you mad because i essentially told you to ***** off?

 

That's not what you said at all but if it makes you feel good to flex in public, have at it. 

Edited December 5, 2019 by John Adams

[Foxx]

16 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

If you want to talk about why you didn't go after the PPP pedo when he was here, feel free. 

 

You asked for evidence of me going after him and I responded, privately, but you now want to make that public. Talk about a crappy thing to do. But go ahead if it makes you feel better. I assumed a douche like you would threaten something like that.  

 

EDIT: Also, if you're going to "out" what I emailed you privately, at least get it right.

 

 

That's not what you said at all but if it makes you feel good to flex in public, have at it. 

i still have no idea who the ***** you are referring to here, hence why i asked you to link to it back when i did. 

 

i have no desire to make your PM to me public. you apparently missed the point i was making there as well. are you really that obtuse?

 

oh, but it is essentially what i said.

[DC Tom]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

i still have no idea who the ***** you are referring to here, hence why i asked you to link to it back when i did. 

 

i have no desire to make your PM to me public. you apparently missed the point i was making there as well. are you really that obtuse?

 

oh, but it is essentially what i said.

 

jboyst

[Foxx]

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

jboyst

thanks. was it before my time that he was outed as being a pedo? because i certainly do not remember any postings of his that would have lent any validity to that.

 

regardless, JA is just being a complete feck here.

[DC Tom]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

thanks. was it before my time that he was outed as being a pedo? because i certainly do not remember any postings of his that would have lent any validity to that.

 

 

It was an open secret.  I never bothered to learn the details.

[John Adams]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

thanks. was it before my time that he was outed as being a pedo? because i certainly do not remember any postings of his that would have lent any validity to that.

 

regardless, JA is just being a complete feck here.

 

Says the guy who inaccurately summarized a private conversation and said he would post details of it here. 

 

It's clear who the ####### is here. 

[Deranged Rhino]

Yeah. It's still you, JA. Not Foxx.  

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

jboyst

Was there ever any documentation of his misdeed(s)? There's a difference between banging a 16 year old when she claimed to be 18 and making a habit out of going after 12 year old girls. With that said, one instance here is a foolish mistake of statutory rape while the other would make him a true pedophile. 

[John Adams]

7 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

It was an open secret.  I never bothered to learn the details.

 

It was no secret and Google gives anything else. And while here, he made plenty of remarks about sex with minors, and even once a great defense of people attracted to post-pubescent girls being normal while those attracted to pre-pubescent girls being disgusting. He is/was atrocious. 

Edited December 5, 2019 by John Adams

[Foxx]

3 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

Says the guy who inaccurately summarized a private conversation and said he would post details of it here. 

 

It's clear who the ####### is here. 

reading comprehension is your friend, you feck.

 

now piss off.

 

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

here, i'll show you what being jerky looks like... you know, just so you can get a 'shoe on the other foot perspective'.

 

should we get into your PM to me just prior to Thanksgiving trying to explain away your deletion of certain postings on the forum with regard to pedophilia?

 

are you mad because i essentially told you to ***** off?

 

Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx

[John Adams]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Yeah. It's still you, JA. Not Foxx.  

 

Says the guy who never attacked him or tried to rid this community of him. 

 

Go back to attacking pedophiles via re-Tweets.

1 hour ago, Foxx said:

 

should we get into your PM to me

 

 

Slime.

[Deranged Rhino]

Move those goalposts. Move 'em good. That's all you can do. 

 

Your ***** is tired and old. You're irrelevant to the conversation down here because you choose to be. Sucks.

[DC Tom]

3 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

It was no secret and Google gives anything else. And while here, he made plenty of remarks about sex with minors, and even once a great defense of people addtracted to post-pubescent girls being normal while those attracted to pre-pubescent girls being disgusting. He is/was atrocious. 

 

Yeah, I never googled him either.  

[John Adams]

3 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Was there ever any documentation of his misdeed(s)? There's a difference between banging a 16 year old when she claimed to be 18 and making a habit out of going after 12 year old girls. With that said, one instance here is a foolish mistake of statutory rape while the other would make him a true pedophile. 

 

You can google his name, see the charge that stuck, the history, and what the judge said about what they found on his computer. 

 

If you think what happened is OK after reading that, I'd be surprised. 

[Deranged Rhino]

He'll be running along to one of his alts in the next few minutes. 

[Foxx]

3 minutes ago, John Adams said:

... Slime.

reading.

comprehension.

 

you do understand what a question mark at the end of a sentence infers, right?

 

again, piss off you worthless feck.

[3rdnlng]

1 minute ago, John Adams said:

 

Says the guy who inaccurately summarized a private conversation and said he would post details of it here. 

 

It's clear who the ####### is here. 

The voting wasn't even close. The Greater Philadelphia Association of Failed Lawyers have awarded you the 2019 Biggest Prick Award.

 

 

[John Adams]

 

3 minutes ago, Foxx said:

reading.

comprehension.

 

you do understand what a question mark at the end of a sentence infers, right?

 

again, piss off you worthless feck.

 

You think threatening to share private PMs is OK? And then you summarize a portion of it, and at that, summarize it inaccurately?

 

The douche spinner remains pointed at you here. 

 

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

He'll be running along to one of his alts in the next few minutes. 

 

You know what he did. You did nothing. The end. 

 

 

Edited December 5, 2019 by John Adams

[Foxx]

8 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

Says the guy who never attacked him or tried to rid this community of him. 

 

Go back to attacking pedophiles via re-Tweets. ...

again, i know this will be lost upon you but on the off chance that it will register one little iota....

 

it is not DR's responsibility to rid this community of anyone and, unfortunately... this includes you.

 

you seem to have a severe disconnect between what one is entitled to do and what one is required to do. if you truly are a lawyer, universe help your clients.

Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx

[Bakin]

7 hours ago, Tiberius said:

Long term consequences are foremost on their minds, if a president can pressure foreign countries to help his/her reelection our republic is in serious trouble 

You keep saying that. But it’s completely false. 
 

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

again, i know this will be lost upon you but on the off chance that it will register one little iota....

 

it is not DR's responsibility to rid this community of anyone and, unfortunately... this includes you.

 

you seem to have a severe disconnect between what one is entitled to do and what one is required to do. if you truly are a lawyer, universe help your clients.

 

He's projecting. He knows everything he believed to be false -- and made post after post saying it was false -- has turned out to be very real. He knows by not adjusting his world view in light of this new information, he's supporting a system that enslaves and abuses us all, not just kids. But he's a clown, who's too broken and chickenshit to make a stand on anything that matters -- so he lashes out at others. 

 

Shifting the goal posts to concoct what he thinks is a slam, when all it is is a very shallow attempt to assuage his own guilt. 

 

He's worthless. And shouldn't be bothered with. 

[OldTimeAFLGuy]

1 hour ago, Albwan said:

 

 You can't tell but I am very sad and solemn about impeachment.

 

...could EASILY be some clowns here.......feel free to fill in the blanks.............

Edited December 5, 2019 by OldTimeAFLGuy

[John Adams]

1 minute ago, Foxx said:

it is not DR's responsibility to rid this community of anyone and, unfortunately... this includes you.

 

No of course not. He can be as silent as a chuchmouse when a convicted sex offender was here.

 

His only responsibility to this community is to act towards a pedophile in a way that he feels he needs to.  

[Foxx]

5 minutes ago, John Adams said:

You think threatening to share private PMs is OK? And then you summarize a portion of it, and at that, summarize it inaccurately?

 

The douche spinner remains pointed at you here. ...

 

 

apparently you need every little thing spelled out for you. my gosh, you are obtuse.

 

the very first sentence of my post  in question was thus; "here, i'll show you what being jerky looks like... you know, just so you can get a 'shoe on the other foot perspective'."

 

you were the one being a douche so i turned it around on you to show you how you were being a douche and i'm one at fault here.....mmmmkay, whatever you say, your obtuseness.

Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx

[Deranged Rhino]

Proving my point  

 

[John Adams]

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He's projecting. He knows everything he believed to be false -- and made post after post saying it was false -- has turned out to be very real. He knows by not adjusting his world view in light of this new information, he's supporting a system that enslaves and abuses us all, not just kids. But he's a clown, who's too broken and chickenshit to make a stand on anything that matters -- so he lashes out at others. 

 

Shifting the goal posts to concoct what he thinks is a slam, when all it is is a very shallow attempt to assuage his own guilt. 

 

He's worthless. And shouldn't be bothered with. 

 

You're ashamed you did nothing to the board pedophile while lauding your anti-pedophile narrative against people you are more than one step from.

 

You should be. 

Edited December 5, 2019 by John Adams

[Deranged Rhino]

Thread is worth consideration. 

 

Edited December 5, 2019 by Deranged Rhino

[John Adams]

Just now, Foxx said:

you were the one being a douche so i turned it around on you to show you how you were being a douche and i'm one at fault here.....mmmmkay, whatever you say, your obtuseness.

 

By sharing your incorrect summary of a private message. 

 

No doubt who the douche is. Still you. 

[Foxx]

4 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

No of course not. He can be as silent as a chuchmouse when a convicted sex offender was here.

 

His only responsibility to this community is to act towards a pedophile in a way that he feels he needs to.  

so, knowing that you understand this... why are you so ***** in the head about it?

 

 

2 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

By sharing your incorrect summary of a private message. 

 

No doubt who the douche is. Still you. 

not one iota of incorrectness in my summary, not one.

 

piss off.

Edited December 5, 2019 by Foxx

[TakeYouToTasker]

And with that, you’ve all allowed the most spineless and intellectually dishonest poster on the board to hijack an important and informational thread which decimates pretty much every one of his arguments, and turn it into a ***** slinging contest about former posters here whom he apparently knew to be a pedophile because he researches pedophile things on the internet, but couldn’t be bothered enough to make everyone else aware.

 

Good work.

 

Leave the piece of ***** pedo defender to his own ugly devices, and get the thread back on track.

[John Adams]

5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

so, knowing that you understand this... why are you so ***** in the head about it?

 

In my old-fashioned mind, we all bore some responsibility to rid PPP of actual known pedophiles in our midst to the extent we could. 

 

He, however, would rather obsess about pedophiles removed from us and fold them into a narrative. That's pretty twisted. He's OK with the pedo right here. Not OK with people far from him.  

2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

And with that, you’ve all allowed the most spineless and intellectually dishonest poster on the board to hijack an important and informational thread which decimates pretty much every one of his arguments, and turn it into a ***** slinging contest about former posters here whom he apparently knew to be a pedophile because he researches pedophile things on the internet, but couldn’t be bothered enough to make everyone else aware.

 

I attacked him time and again. If you didn't catch it, tough breasts. [funny filter edit]

 

Quote

Good work.

 

Leave the piece of ***** pedo defender to his own ugly devices, and get the thread back on track.

 

"Defender" that's rich. I'm sure the alt- board covered Boyst's exploits. 

Edited December 5, 2019 by John Adams

[Deranged Rhino]

1 minute ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

And with that, you’ve all allowed the most spineless and intellectually dishonest poster on the board to hijack an important and informational thread which decimates pretty much every one of his arguments, and turn it into a ***** slinging contest about former posters here whom he apparently knew to be a pedophile because he researches pedophile things on the internet, but couldn’t be bothered enough to make everyone else aware.

 

Good work.

 

Leave the piece of ***** pedo defender to his own ugly devices, and get the thread back on track.

 

[3rdnlng]

4 minutes ago, John Adams said:

 

In my old-fashioned mind, we all bore some responsibility to rid PPP of actual known pedophiles in our midst to the extent we could. 

 

He, however, would rather obsess about pedophiles removed from us and fold them into a narrative. That's pretty twisted. He's OK with the pedo right here. Not OK with people far from him.  

If I were you I'd be getting a little nervous if we ever decide to rid PPP of asswipes. 

[Foxx]

9 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

And with that, you’ve all allowed the most spineless and intellectually dishonest poster on the board to hijack an important and informational thread which decimates pretty much every one of his arguments, and turn it into a ***** slinging contest about former posters here whom he apparently knew to be a pedophile because he researches pedophile things on the internet, but couldn’t be bothered enough to make everyone else aware.

 

Good work.

 

Leave the piece of ***** pedo defender to his own ugly devices, and get the thread back on track.

my fault TYTT. i should have let it slide but i couldn't let his attempt to smear me with his pedophilia obsession go by without some sort of defense.

[Deranged Rhino]

 

[Deranged Rhino]

 

 

[keepthefaith]

I'm trying to understand the dems choice to impeach.  They have to know that once this reaches the senate, witness testimony will be much different and their chances of winning are about zero since the jury of senators will vote in a partisan fashion and the case itself will be historically weak.  So what's their calculus?  That being able to say the President was impeached and that Republicans obstructed a just outcome and having it amplified by media will be a politically winning strategy? 

 

I suppose that's better than having to oppose an incumbent with a weak candidate and a good economy, but they will certainly rile up opposition voters like never before.

[Dr. Who]

2 minutes ago, keepthefaith said:

I'm trying to understand the dems choice to impeach.  They have to know that once this reaches the senate, witness testimony will be much different and their chances of winning are about zero since the jury of senators will vote in a partisan fashion and the case itself will be historically weak.  So what's their calculus?  That being able to say the President was impeached and that Republicans obstructed a just outcome and having it amplified by media will be a politically winning strategy? 

 

I suppose that's better than having to oppose an incumbent with a weak candidate and a good economy, but they will certainly rile up opposition voters like never before.

Evil, at bottom, is imbecilic.