Jump to content

The Sham Impeachment Inquiry & Whistleblower Saga: A Race to Get Ahead of the OIG


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

I was told by this person that that person said this and that...

Shesh the telephone game would be clearer


heard it from a friend

who

heard it from a friend

whoooooo

heard it from another 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

———-

 

can we get the liberals who believe in the Telephone Game as a Universal Theory to finally believe it fails 100 percent because someone like me is always ruining it?

 

I’m told: “Sally wore a blue sweater to the dentist.”

 

so I tell the next person: “Space aliens orange  interesting”

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

An hour and half in: 

 

 

He says we love conspiracies -- while literally pushing a long debunked conspiracy theory. Without a hint of irony. 


Why? 

 

Because he's an NPC. And has no clue what the ***** is happening. 

Complaining about someone, complaining about conspiracy theories while pushing a debunked conspiracy theory, while you post a tweet also pushing a debunked conspiracy theory.

 

Irony inception...ironception?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Warcodered said:

Complaining about someone, complaining about conspiracy theories while pushing a debunked conspiracy theory, while you post a tweet also pushing a debunked conspiracy theory.

 

Irony inception...ironception?

 

You're wrong. What's debunked about the above?

 

...Exactly. 

 

Black ledger - Real

CrowdStrike - Real

FancyBear - Real

US Officials for Obama pressuring the Ukraine to find dirt on Trump during the campaign - Real. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"made me uncomfortable" "I was surprised" ""...more concerned" "struck me" "I thought" "I was beginning to fear"

"I was concerned" "extremely troubling to me" "...still troubled" "serious concern" "my concerns" " i was embarrassed"

"i was alarmed" "very concerned" "president trump told him, who told me"" i was not informed the payment was made"

 

Is this guy kidding?

nothing but a lot of concerns and hearsay...

 

...zero facts in that guys testimony.

Edited by Albwan
  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

I was told by this person that that person said this and that...

Shesh the telephone game would be clearer

 

It's not just "the telephone game."  It's "the Russian telephone game."...

 

...wait for it...

 

...WAKE UP SHEEPLE!!!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Albwan said:

"made me uncomfortable" "I was surprised" ""...more concerned" "struck me" "I thought" "I was beginning to fear"

"I was concerned" "extremely troubling to me" "...still troubled" "serious concern" "my concerns" " i was embarrassed"

"i was alarmed" "very concerned" "president trump told him, who told me"" i was no informed the payment was made"

 

Is this guy kidding?

nothing but a lot of concerns and hearsay...

 

...zero facts in that guys testimony.

 

Zero facts, all hearsay and second/third hand information -- topped off with a sanctimonious belief that he, not the president, should be the one to decide US foreign policy. 

 

Which brings us back to why Trump/Russia was started to begin with. It was started because the establishment people like Taylor did not like how Trump, then a candidate, was talking about foreign policy. How dare he try to end the regime change agenda, the coup agenda, and all the ways in which people like Taylor (and Clinton, McCain, Obama) got rich getting kickbacks off said agenda. 

 

It's the same rationale, with even less evidence this time to support it. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You're wrong. What's debunked about the above?

 

...Exactly. 

Did you just wait for my response within the post I'd respond too? That's not how forums work ?

 

As to what's debunked I'd say the whole Obama Ukraine 2016 conspiracy. So wait they conspire to stop Trump and are therefore untrustworthy but now their leader is telling the truth because it helps Trump? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Warcodered said:

Did you just wait for my response within the post I'd respond too? That's not how forums work ?

 

As to what's debunked I'd say the whole Obama Ukraine 2016 conspiracy. So wait they conspire to stop Trump and are therefore untrustworthy but now their leader is telling the truth because it helps Trump? ?

 

It has not been debunked. 

 

You think the black ledger is debunked? It's why Manafort is in jail. Where did it come from?

 

The Ukraine. 

 

FancyBear is a Ukrainian cyber weapon -- that's what was allegedly used to hack the DNC/DCCC servers.

 

You're wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just went back at re-read the transcript to make sure I wasn’t missing anything and to try and take another fair look at this. 
 

essentially, this all boils down to whether or not it’s proper for the president to pursue answers to serious potential corruption and crime related to presidential elections and former sitting VPs abusing power.  There is no Quid in there at all. None. 
 

if you believe it was improper for the president to ask the Ukraine to help with these investigations, then who would do it?  Would it be improper if it was related to Dick Cheney?  Does being an active politician in the opposing party give you blanket immunity and Carte Blanche to do whatever you want?

 

also, if the President was attempting to “extort” the Ukraine for dirt on his political opponents, would he conduct that effort in plain view of the world?  
 

the Dems story just makes no logical sense. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:


It has been painful. I do not think I'll stick with it.

 

I confess I did watch for about one minute that Amb Taylor, what an arrogant bombastic ass, he really does think he is superior and he sets that national agenda, people on both sides of the aisle should be scared of these bureaucratic unelected officials thinking they are in charge and the PRESIDENT has to answer to them

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I'll give it to the other side gets to ask some questions. 

 

Easy ones -

 

If you were concerned about lack of funding leading to Ukrainian deaths, what did you do between 2014 and 2016 when no aid at all was provided?

If you are not aware of any US official threatening to withhold any aid for political or personal reasons, how would you explain VP Biden bragging about holding up aid until the Ukrainian prosecutor was fired?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

Directed by Michael Bay coming to theaters near you.

 

Bay's movies draw big at the box office. Marketing is marketing... and Trump has always excelled at it. All this is today is a 2020 campaign ad for the left. They've got a snoozefest to offer while Trump has this. 

Trump wins. 

 

Also -- since you avoided the response about your false claim that the 2016 Ukrainian interference in our election is "debunked", here's information you should consider. On top of the others I've pointed you to look into. 

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...