Jump to content

Bills at Browns Post Game Post Mortem


Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

 

How many did EJ start before he was ran out of town?

 

I think Allen should start next year. I also think it's smart to draft a QB in the 2nd or 3rd round next year in case Allen can't make the year 3 jump. 


Totally agree with you, but I think ya wait until the end of the season before you start talking about drafting another QB. Just see how this plays out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were receivers getting open deep, Allen just does not have a consistent accurate deep ball.

DaBoll fails to use Singletary enough even though he is getting it done whenever he is called upon.

Hause Money chokes on a short easy FG.

Allen still has serious ball protection issues.

Beane has not helped enough by bringing in impact players during the season and our higher round rookie draft picks are yet again not “NFL” starter ready.

Lee Smith brings little to the team and his costly penalties keep hurting the team.

Ford may have future potential, but his premature learning on the field during the season in important situations is hurting the team's present.

Playoff winning teams need to build an offense that can score more than 20 points per game.

There is just not enough talent in this team's offense, and that is all on Beane.

As a fan it feels like management is again sacrificing the current season for the nebulous promise of a better “future” that never comes, yet again for almost the 20th year. How many more years am I expected to accept the “we are building for the future” excuse for another futile season.

Edited by simpleman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Takes from yesterday.

 

* Allen is merely an adequate QB. His strength (Running) can be his undoing, as once again- he fumbled in a critical situation-albeit being bailed out. His Passing ability (the reason Beane Boy went down to get him) is very, average. He obviously lacks the ability to EVER be within five yards of any intended Receiver on a long Go route and he lacks consistency on the short stuff! THAT is a deal breaker. In addition, he simply cannot read open Receivers after the primary one. If progress is not seen, the Bills need to get back to the Draft Board!

 

* The WRs are Smurfs. As I’ve said for a Millenium, Buffalo needs huge men for targets- especially in the cold, rain and snow of the back half of the Season. These are not good enough.

 

* The OC is once again- substandard. Can anyone point to more than 1-2 of the nine and say- Daboll nailed the game plan? It is boring and inept- a killer in the NFL.

 

* When that buffoon Hitchens outcoaches McD, that is a real cause for concern. McD is good, but by good, I mean in the 2nd. Tier of NFL HCs. Again... not good enough.

 

* The idiot kicker? Can anyone explain why he is still here? If you can’t kick from 50 yards in the NFL, you are a liability. If you can’t make them from 30, you need to be out the door!

 

* The D is sound, but not even close to being a monstah. It will effectively handle the stiffs, but anyone with talent- NO chance. 
 

* My realistic and just slightly optimistic 10-6 record is more likely 9-7, with a loss to the far superior Ravens. If they banana skin on one of the stiffs, it’s the same old, Millenium siren song of mediocrity & ineptitude!

THAT IS NEITHER PROGRESS OR PROCESS!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cripple Creek said:

Thanks. We consider ourselves warned.

 

 

Daboll cost us the game yesterday. Everyone, aside from him, knew the formula to scoring on the Browns.  He is, in a word, suckitude, personified. 

 

They had a timeout and instead let 30 seconds run off. They kicked that final field goal with a timeout in their pocket. Whose fault is that?

 

Allen is 0-16 on passes 30 yards or more in the air.

Edited by Chemical
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Cripple Creek said:

So, winning in the NFL is dependent on what is a low percentage throw to begin with?  

 

Allen does decent (I believe) in the 15-25 yard throws so I have to assume you're talking about those 40+ yarders.

 

21+ yards and the completion % is only 43.  The drop to the passes you're talking about would be precipitous. Maybe somewhere in the 25-30% range, perhaps lower, yet you are grasping at this one thin straw as being the thing you want your QB to be good at?

 

What Bills receivers would you be sending long? I have, unfortunately, only two options: Brown, Foster.  Beasley and McKittrick are most definitely not the option of choice for a deep ball.  I would love to know how many times Allen has practiced those throws to those two specific receivers. 

 

https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2019/2018-19-deep-ball-project

 

It’s not a thin straw. Allen’s complete inability to come close to his receivers on the deep ball is severely hurting this offense. There is no big play ability. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

It’s not a thin straw. Allen’s complete inability to come close to his receivers on the deep ball is severely hurting this offense. There is no big play ability. 


What it means, is that if he can’t even throw ONE deep one, he’s never, ever gonna achieve the present day, modest marker for NFL QB success- 300 yards! Why? Because, only superlative QBs can throw for at least 20 completions of 15 or more or 25 of slightly shorter variety.
Allen is not that guy! Waaaaaay to inconsistent and lacking the ability to find open receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

It’s not a thin straw. Allen’s complete inability to come close to his receivers on the deep ball is severely hurting this offense. There is no big play ability. 

So, you are putting all your chips on the table for the low percentage play. Thanks.

24 minutes ago, Chemical said:

 

They had a timeout and instead let 30 seconds run off. They kicked that final field goal with a timeout in their pocket. Whose fault is that?

 

Allen is 0-16 on passes 30 yards or more in the air.

and you want to replace the QB? What about the guy who keeps calling for those long balls? What about the guy who sent Beasley long? What about the guy who sent MCKittrick long? What about the guy who twice called for passes on third and 3-4 knowing that we would go for it on fourth down?

 

Allen may or may not be the guy.  Daboll is most definitely not the OC and my concerns about McDermott grow as he continues to tolerte this BS for the sake of The Process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Game plan on offense stunk and McDermott coached timid at the end.  Putting the game on a struggling kicker probably not the best idea. Maybe McDermott still pictures Hauschka of 2017 kicking 50 yarders like they were xps.  More troubling is the vaunted Buffalo D allowed the Browns to march 80 yards for a td with the game on the line in the 4th quarter. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to hot take this thing, but serious question. Why does this staff constantly over value special teams at the offenses expense? Not saying he’s a game breaker, but there is no way a guy like Senorise Perry should be active on game day over TJ Yeldon or Duke Williams. I’m not saying the result would’ve been different, but if you know the game plan is to throw the ball 40 times and ignore the run, then why not make all your best pass catchers available?  Perry is invisible at the job he’s asked (which I guess is a good thing) and the special teams is largely average. I’d rather give up a little yardage in the kicking game to buoy the offense with everything we have at our disposal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheProcess said:

Not trying to hot take this thing, but serious question. Why does this staff constantly over value special teams at the offenses expense? Not saying he’s a game breaker, but there is no way a guy like Senorise Perry should be active on game day over TJ Yeldon or Duke Williams. I’m not saying the result would’ve been different, but if you know the game plan is to throw the ball 40 times and ignore the run, then why not make all your best pass catchers available?  Perry is invisible at the job he’s asked (which I guess is a good thing) and the special teams is largely average. I’d rather give up a little yardage in the kicking game to buoy the offense with everything we have at our disposal. 

 

ST have been a joke for the Bills for decades, aside from ace punter Moorman

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

ST have been a joke for the Bills for decades, aside from ace punter Moorman

 

 

That’s my point. No matter how many people we roll out there (DiMarco included), the ST is always pretty bad. And that’s ok if your offense is humming and you aren’t giving up big returns for TDs. They need to Stop taking away from the offense to help a unit that is average and offers little to the outcome. Again, Yeldon and Duke inactive yesterday isn’t the reason we lost. This is more of a broader point. But you can’t tell me Yeldon and Duke can’t be coached to run down the field and make a dang tackle on ST. 

Edited by TheProcess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, John from Riverside said:

That is not really the way it works

you should see progress and you have 

 

Was thinking about progress overall for the offense.

 

I have some concerns based on Daboll's offensive system success at his other NFL stops over his career.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, TheProcess said:

That’s my point. No matter how many people we roll out there (DiMarco included), the ST is always pretty bad. And that’s ok if your offense is humming and you aren’t giving up big returns for TDs. They need to Stop taking away from the offense to help a unit that is average and offers little to the outcome. Again, Yeldon and Duke inactive yesterday isn’t the reason we lost. This is more of a broader point. But you can’t tell me Yeldon and Duke can’t be coached to run down the field and make a dang tackle on ST. 

 

ST is the one that teams figure they can let slide by when the O and D have such obvious problems

 

trouble is the Pats see ST as a major priority, figures it helps with a handful of wins every season....

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheProcess said:

Not trying to hot take this thing, but serious question. Why does this staff constantly over value special teams at the offenses expense? Not saying he’s a game breaker, but there is no way a guy like Senorise Perry should be active on game day over TJ Yeldon or Duke Williams. I’m not saying the result would’ve been different, but if you know the game plan is to throw the ball 40 times and ignore the run, then why not make all your best pass catchers available?  Perry is invisible at the job he’s asked (which I guess is a good thing) and the special teams is largely average. I’d rather give up a little yardage in the kicking game to buoy the offense with everything we have at our disposal. 

The Process dictates actives/inactives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cripple Creek said:

So, you are putting all your chips on the table for the low percentage play. Thanks.

and you want to replace the QB? What about the guy who keeps calling for those long balls? What about the guy who sent Beasley long? What about the guy who sent MCKittrick long? What about the guy who twice called for passes on third and 3-4 knowing that we would go for it on fourth down?

 

Allen may or may not be the guy.  Daboll is most definitely not the OC and my concerns about McDermott grow as he continues to tolerte this BS for the sake of The Process.

 

That “low percentage play” has extremely high rewards and completely changes how opposing teams defend the offense. 

 

I don’t “want” to replace the quarterback. But when the quarterback is holding the franchise back, you have no choice.

 

I don’t think Daboll or McDermott are worth hanging onto either. Daboll is in over his head and McDermott chose him - his second failed OC. He doesn’t get a third choice.

 

I’m on the fence with Beane. Maybe he can get one more HC/QB chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

That “low percentage play” has extremely high rewards and completely changes how opposing teams defend the offense. 

 

I don’t “want” to replace the quarterback. But when the quarterback is holding the franchise back, you have no choice.

 

I don’t think Daboll or McDermott are worth hanging onto either. Daboll is in over his head and McDermott chose him - his second failed OC. He doesn’t get a third choice.

 

I’m on the fence with Beane. Maybe he can get one more HC/QB chance.

I think McDermott does a good job of motivating the team and gets them fired up to compete at a high level every game.  That is a big part of an NFL HC's duties, and he does that well.

 

All other aspects of being a HC he does poorly.


In word, he is what I would call "replaceable."

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nextmanup said:

I think McDermott does a good job of motivating the team and gets them fired up to compete at a high level every game.  That is a big part of an NFL HC's duties, and he does that well.

 

All other aspects of being a HC he does poorly.


In word, he is what I would call "replaceable."

 

Did the team look fired up at any point yesterday? Defense gave up a touchdown to begin the game and another to end the game. Offense are walking zombies. I don’t see it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...