Jump to content

I Think Milano is the Problem with our Run D


Recommended Posts

It's a fools errand to try to identify which defender is supposed to be in which gap. Only the ones with the assignments know that.

 

Watching those videos it is hard for me to tell if Edmunds or Milano is supposed to fill the gap. Maybe both of them are equally to blame. Or maybe the linemen are not holding their ground well enough and producing too many large gaps to fill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MJS said:

It's a fools errand to try to identify which defender is supposed to be in which gap. Only the ones with the assignments know that.

 

Watching those videos it is hard for me to tell if Edmunds or Milano is supposed to fill the gap. Maybe both of them are equally to blame. Or maybe the linemen are not holding their ground well enough and producing too many large gaps to fill.

While that is very much generally true... The techniques the lineman are playing can give a better idea of gap responsibility

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

I agree that he has to play better but up until the recent musical chairs at DT Edmunds HAD been playing extremely well. 

 

Now my head is spinning.  Weren't you among the loudest voices calling out Edmunds for not hitting the right gap as the biggest problem with the run defense?  The DT carousel started AFTER the Miami game, apparently when their OC uncovered the weakness in the run D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, klos63 said:

I think that's too much generalization. It's the linebackers job to fill the gaps and that's not being done.

Just for clarification it’s not that it’s not being done it’s that it’s not 100% fit it up doesn’t make it OKJust for clarification it’s not that it’s not being done it’s that it’s not 100% fit it up doesn’t make it OK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First one looked squarely to be Milano and 2nd one looked like 98 taking a very hard angle to the other side of the line leaving a giant gap. The other thing is McD plays some cover 4. Cover 4 is know for being good against the pass and against outside runs but requires good gap integrity or you get burned between the tackles. Teams are just attacking his scheme the way they are taught to attack it. I expect to see more Shaq, because he isn't a speed rusher anyway, and less wide base DEs so teams don't have such giant lanes going forward. We aren't getting the outside edge rush anyway so why take such wide stances?

Edited by Locomark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GunnerBill said:

 

It is one of my gripes with Star. I don't feel like he is a finisher. I felt it on that play and I felt it again on the play Sunday where he ends up facing his own endzone. He doesn't completely blow his assignment, he knows his job but he just doesn't finish and there are plays that he could make at the end of a down, if he just maintained his effort, that might just hold that run to fewer yards than it otherwise goes for. 

Is it just me or does it seem like star completely runs by the play because he can’t move sideways

Edited by John from Riverside
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As others have mentioned, it’s near impossible to know what their assignments/rules/keys are on these plays. That being said, there is one major issue here regardless: 

 

Hesitation. Their lack of reaction directly leads to them catching blocks on their heels. 
 

that being said, the defense is still playing well. McD would rather give up those runs than a big pass play IMO. Having players as twitchy and athletic as Milano/Edmunds means we sacrifice size and “fill” in the middle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ScottLaw said:

It’s not just about getting bigger and stronger. He hesitates and is slow to react. It’s been the case since day 1... I don’t think he has the instincts to play MLB, but maybe I’m wrong and he figures it out.

He hesitates because he is overthinking

 

Usually a veteran will hit a hump and learn to start playing and not thinking. It's not a guarantee but I think Tremaine will get there

Edited by Buffalo716
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GG said:

 

Now my head is spinning.  Weren't you among the loudest voices calling out Edmunds for not hitting the right gap as the biggest problem with the run defense?  The DT carousel started AFTER the Miami game, apparently when their OC uncovered the weakness in the run D.

That IS the biggest problem with the run defense imo. And he had been playing extremely well up until Miami. They've been shuffling the defensive line rotation ever since H Phillips went down and it caught up with them. 

 

Go back and watch the second quarter of the NE game. It was the first time iirc they experimented w/Peko and Oliver and the Pats noticed it immediately and started gashing them on the ground. Looked very similar to the run defense the last 2.5. Frazier immediately puts Lotulelei and Phillips back in, things tighten back up and we hold. But that imo was the start of the cat-and-mouse they've been playing w/opposing OCs wrt DT rotation. 

 

It was the same scheme that game, just everyone was firing and they were really up for it. Once they start getting out-schemed, they (LBs especially) start to hesitate and react instead. Then they get into leveling wars between Frazier/McD and OCs like Redskins game. They need to get back to trusting the scheme, playing solid one gap and trusting the guy next to you is going to do his job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gotta disagree. 

I don't think it's any one person, but the every game lately I see Edmunds making tackles well downfield, rarely meeting the RB at the line. And when he does, he's too tall & hitting up high, so he gets pushed back or plowed over.

 

I'm not saying Edmunds is even bad or anything, only that for whatever reason (scheme, positioning, I don't know) he hasn't been very good at stopping the run. I mentioned his height because I'm starting to think his lengthy body might make it harder for him to get down & stop these strong, stout RB's at the point of contact. It helps in pass defense though, so it's a give & take.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...