Jump to content

Jeffrey Epstein Arrested, DEAD in apparent suicide 8/10/19. Epstein Handler Maxwell arrested/denied bail.


Recommended Posts

Just now, Buffalo_Gal said:

Ah, I see... they got their marching orders. Twitter is the same three photos (plus doctored ones) trying to say Trump fired Berman to stop this. Hahahahaha Idjits. Trump fired Berman so this could happen.

 

Inside scoop: Trump fired Berman because his wife spilled sangria on Ivanka's periwinkle blouse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Melania Trump said:

 

Inside scoop: Trump fired Berman because his wife spilled sangria on Ivanka's periwinkle blouse.

 

Interesting thread for you to try to derail a discussion.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s encouraging to see her arrested, but I’ve gotten to the point where I just find it hard to believe anyone of any significance will ever go down on these things. 
 

 

Edited by dubs
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


These idiots cannot connect that  Epstein and Maxwell were allowed to roam free and do their worst (which was horrific) through (at least) the Clinton, GW Bush, and Obama administrations and yet arrested during the Trump administration. 
 


Awe - you are a special kind of stupid - aren’t you?

 

Why did Trump’s Labor Secretary Alex Acosta resign?


image.thumb.jpeg.b5a7e79ee2ec37298fbdb439493d5c36.jpeg

 

 

image.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Reality Check said:

Deranged Rhino may not be posting here for now, but this thread is proof of his support of finding the inconvenient, disgusting truths at all costs and spreading the word...

 

...we just want the truth.


98% of posters here want the truth. 
 

2% are racist, communist, radical, left wing, democratic agitator bots. - aka NPCs
 

 

Edited by dubs
  • Like (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, dubs said:


bug off Turd. 
 

there isn’t a single person who wouldn’t want trump thrown in prison if he was involved in this. 
 

there is, however, half the country that would jump up and down and throw themselves on the ground if pictures of Bill or anyone on the communist left was implicated (hint: they already are). 
 

 

FIFY.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dubs said:


98% of posters here want the truth. 
 

2% are racist, communist, radical, left wing, democratic agitator bots. - aka NPCs
 

 

 

Exactly this!!! Well said! I will add we need the 2% voices of racist, communist, radical, left wing, democratic agitator bots. These voices who are the small, small minority on here and in America/World are just reinforcing the idiocy that is their views. We thank the 2% and their idiotic and evil ideas. They will fail miserably!!! No Doubt about that! The hammer is on the way!

 

 

 

Edited by wppete
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, dubs said:


bug off nerd. 
 

there isn’t a single person who wouldn’t want trump thrown in prison if he was involved in this. 
 

there is, however, half the country that would jump up and down and throw themselves on the ground if pictures of Bill or anyone on the communist left was implicated (hint: they already are). 
 

 


Not true - Bill should be indicted immediately if he was involved w underage females like Trump

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, fansince88 said:

I wonder if we could get a definition of "total lie". Is seemed to be a struggle before.


Well, I can provide an example. 
 

It would be something like saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski” when in fact you did have sexual relations with Miss Lewinski. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dubs said:


Well, I can provide an example. 
 

It would be something like saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski” when in fact you did have sexual relations with Miss Lewinski. 

So total lie is like saying the same but replacing lie with truth. Thats what I thought!

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Reality Check said:

 

 

There is no way on God's green Earth that it's a coincidence.

 

 

I love watching the TDS logic.

 

1. Maxwell hasn't been arrested because it would be bad for Trump.

2. Barr is Trump’s lackey.

3. Barr fired Berman to protect Trump.

 

 (Berman is gone and Maxwell is finally arrested.)

 

4. Trump should be scared.

 

  • Like (+1) 5
  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LB3 said:

I love watching the TDS logic.

 

1. Maxwell hasn't been arrested because it would be bad for Trump.

2. Barr is Trump’s lackey.

3. Barr fired Berman to protect Trump.

 

 (Berman is gone and Maxwell is finally arrested.)

 

4. Trump should be scared.

 

 

That sums it up beautifully.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LB3 said:

I love watching the TDS logic.

 

1. Maxwell hasn't been arrested because it would be bad for Trump.

2. Barr is Trump’s lackey.

3. Barr fired Berman to protect Trump.

 

 (Berman is gone and Maxwell is finally arrested.)

 

4. Trump should be scared.

 

 

In their defense, "logic" has as specific a meaning as "defund"

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, billsfan1959 said:

 

In their defense, "logic" has as specific a meaning as "defund"

? Speaking of Logic, it's amazing that that moron has become a respected thinker on the main board in the Wuhan Flu era.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wnyguy said:

 

 

He was also escorted out of Trumps property when he was accused of doing something unseemly to a young girl. I believe it was Trump who ordered him out.

 

AND, Trump is the only one of his stature who walked in and offered to testify AGAINST Epstein in that Florida case!

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, dubs said:

It’s encouraging to see her arrested, but I’ve gotten to the point where I just find it hard to believe anyone of any significance will ever go down on these things. 
 

 

 

 

...charges are from 1994-1997......anybody see a problem for a jury to convict on something from 23-26 years ago?............

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cinga said:

 

AND, Trump is the only one of his stature who walked in and offered to testify AGAINST Epstein in that Florida case!

 

There are SO MANY sources for this. Too bad the lamestream media covers them up. I think I have papers in the armoire that can prove it for the folks here in PPP. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LB3 said:

? Speaking of Logic, it's amazing that that moron has become a respected thinker on the main board in the Wuhan Flu era.

 

Mind boggling, but not surprising. They tend to welcome any view there, as long it is isn't different from theirs. Because they are the enlightened, tolerant ones....

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, dubs said:


Well, I can provide an example. 
 

It would be something like saying, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinski” when in fact you did have sexual relations with Miss Lewinski. 

 

Define SEX

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cinga said:

 

AND, Trump is the only one of his stature who walked in and offered to testify AGAINST Epstein in that Florida case!

 

 

When you say Trump do you mean Donald Trump? President Donald Trump? The one everyone is pointing fingers at as being a friend and accomplice to Epstein and Maxwell? That Trump? {sarcasm off)

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Winston Zeddemore said:

 

There are charges beyond those years as well. 

 

 

...beyond or more current?......I'm guessing much would depend upon statute of limitations, but the attorneys bringing charges must know.....could see defense attorneys making a big deal about the age of initial charges to cast doubt.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said:

 

 

...beyond or more current?......I'm guessing much would depend upon statute of limitations, but the attorneys bringing charges must know.....could see defense attorneys making a big deal about the age of initial charges to cast doubt.....

 

The bit of the indictment I've seen there appears to be 3 "victims" at least. And I doubt they would be listed if they are not willing to testify. But I suspect there is a lot more that we may never know about, but hopefully puts at least some of these sick bastards away for a very long time.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, njbuff said:

 

Just grab the Webster's Dictionary you have that is holding up your coffee table. ?

 

Ha!!!!!!!!

Thanks for the help but I just asked my wife and she reminded me... ?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Winston Zeddemore said:

 

I'm not absolutely certain, as I'm still reading the indictment. Though, she was also referenced (unnamed) in Epstein's indictment from 2002-2005. The 94-97 period referenced in today's indictment is focused on her grooming/transporting of minors.

 

The timing of that is quite important for reasons that will become more clear down the road. 

 

 

...good points and thanks......more current stuff and witnesses willing to come forward would strengthen the case.......

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...