Trump lies, post them here

[row_33]

if your life is consisting of trying to deny the Holocaust or being a moron about it....

 

.

 

[Tiberius]

The census question about citizenship is needed to protect the voting rights act. Even though John Roberts stated clearly that this was not true, four of the Conservatives justices voted for the government. That's calling balls and strikes? Or is it just partisan hackery? 

 

 

[Tiberius]

Quote

 

The President blamed his weird reference to Revolutionary War armies taking over airports on the teleprompter going black, claiming he was “right in the middle of that sentence” when it cut out.

“The teleprompter went out, it kept going on and then at the end it just went out, it went kaput, so I could’ve said — and actually right in the middle of that sentence it went out and that’s not a good feeling,” he said. “When you’re standing in front of millions and millions of people on television and I don’t know what the final count was but that went all the way back to the Washington Monumen

 

  Oh stop! Which of you people actually believe this? He thinks you are stupid 

[DC Tom]

17 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

  Oh stop! Which of you people actually believe this? He thinks you are stupid 

 

Of course it's nonsense.  Everyone knows they Continental Forces were strictly limited to aircraft carriers.  Where were they going to build airfields in the original 13 colonies?

[3rdnlng]

1 hour ago, DC Tom said:

 

Of course it's nonsense.  Everyone knows they Continental Forces were strictly limited to aircraft carriers.  Where were they going to build airfields in the original 13 colonies?

Kitty Hawk?

[Foxx]

2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Kitty Hawk?

thems had to be some long ass aircraft carriers.

[DC Tom]

26 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

Kitty Hawk?

 

You can't build an airfield on sand dunes.  They're not stable enough.  

[Kemp]

28 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

You can't build an airfield on sand dunes.  They're not stable enough.  

 

What if a stable genius designed it?

[Tiberius]

 

Quote

 

President Trump on Monday shared a fictitious quote from former President Reagan said to predict his own presidency, calling it "cute."

Trump retweeted a two-year-old post from an account with 13 followers, which included a 1987 photo of Reagan and Trump.

The photo is real, but there is no evidence that Reagan actually delivered the prediction. The quotation with the photo states: “For the life of me, and I’ll never know how to explain it, when I met that young man, I felt like I was the one shaking hands with a president.”

“Cute!” the president commented.

Twitter suspended the account shortly after Trump retweeted it.

 

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/451972-trump-shares-fictitious-quote-of-reagan-predicting-his-presidency

[row_33]

 

 

[McGee Return TD]

 

[njbuff]

Josh Allen has been told worse things on the road than the "send them back" chant.

 

He seems to be doing ok, so will the Flab 4.

[Koko78]

46 minutes ago, njbuff said:

Josh Allen has been told worse things on the road than the "send them back" chant.

 

He seems to be doing ok, so will the Flab 4.

 

How dare you insinuate that the Jihad Squad has a weight problem?!?!

 

That's hurtful, xenophobic, and racist, you evil actual literal super mecha Nazi!

[njbuff]

1 hour ago, Koko78 said:

 

How dare you insinuate that the Jihad Squad has a weight problem?!?!

 

That's hurtful, xenophobic, and racist, you evil actual literal super mecha Nazi!

 

Would you rather me call them the 4 Stooges?

 

Is that hurtful, xenophobic and racist enough for you?

 

Being Italian makes it kinda difficult for me to be a Nazi.

 

?

 

 

P.S................

 

You had better watch yourself Koko, sarcasm isn't allowed in the political realm. It isn't racist enough. ?

[Koko78]

7 hours ago, njbuff said:

Would you rather me call them the 4 Stooges?

 

Is that hurtful, xenophobic and racist enough for you?

 

 

That's crossing a line, pal! NO ONE INSULTS SHEMP AND LIVES!

[row_33]

The 4 horse-toothed jackasses of the Apocalypse 

[Tiberius]

21 hours ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

Pretty soon he will be saying he tried stopping Jeffery Epstein, too 

[3rdnlng]

51 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Pretty soon he will be saying he tried stopping Jeffery Epstein, too 

You're such a silly little lemming, making every attempt to connect those two. Trump did throw him out of his club though, that we know.

[Koko78]

11 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

You're such a silly little lemming, making every attempt to connect those two. Trump did throw him out of his club though, that we know.

 

Who cares that Trump banned him for life from Mar-a-Lago for trying to assault a 14 year old, and that Trump was the only one who tried to help Epstein's victims?!?

 

There's a freakin' video of them partying 15 years earlier with cheerleaders! Cheerleaders who are consenting adults! That's immoral and clearly links Trump to being involved in pedophilia!

[McGee Return TD]

There is zero evidence to prove Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago. It's hearsay from a lawyer who admitted that what he said (Trump evicted Epstein) could not be proven.

 

facts, though

Edited July 19, 2019 by McGee Return TD

[B-Man]

3 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

There is zero evidence to prove Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-lago. It's hearsay from a lawyer who admitted that what he said (Trump evicted Epstein) could not be proven.

 

facts, though

 

 

Link ?

 

 

.

[Deranged Rhino]

"There's no evidence the FBI/DOJ/Obama White House spied on Trump."

McGee in 2017. 

 

(Keep confusing media silence/failure to investigate as proof of absence)

[McGee Return TD]

1 minute ago, B-Man said:

 

 

Link ?

 

 

.

 

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/all-we-know-about-the-new-case-against-jeffrey-epstein.html

 

There have been unconfirmed claims that Trump has tried to distance himself from Epstein. According to court documents filed by a lawyer representing three of Epstein’s alleged victims, Trump banned his former friend from Mar-a-Lago because he “sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.” But the same lawyer later said in an interview that he was unable to confirm that claim, though he did emphasize that Trump was cooperative and helpful as he built his case against Epstein.

 

 

[3rdnlng]

45 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/all-we-know-about-the-new-case-against-jeffrey-epstein.html

 

There have been unconfirmed claims that Trump has tried to distance himself from Epstein. According to court documents filed by a lawyer representing three of Epstein’s alleged victims, Trump banned his former friend from Mar-a-Lago because he “sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.” But the same lawyer later said in an interview that he was unable to confirm that claim, though he did emphasize that Trump was cooperative and helpful as he built his case against Epstein.

 

 

That's a horseshit claim. I haven't been able to confirm that claim either so does that prove that there is zero evidence to support the claim that Trump barred the pedophile from Mar-A-Lago?

[B-Man]

So he felt strongly enough to file the account in court, but expressed doubt about it to the media later..........................solid  ?

 

 

 

“Trump allegedly banned Epstein from his Mar-lago Club in West Palm Beach because Epstein sexually assaulted a girl at the club,” according to the papers, filed in the Sunshine State as part of an ongoing legal battle between Epstein and Bradley Edwards, who represented many of Epstein’s underage accusers in civil suits against him.

 

The filing is dated April 2011, well before Trump ascended to the presidency.

[McGee Return TD]

1 hour ago, 3rdnlng said:

I haven't been able to confirm that claim either so does that prove that there is zero evidence to support the claim that Trump barred the pedophile from Mar-A-Lago?

 

Of course not!  However, as I previously stated, it's not evidence to prove Trump banned him. That evidence has yet to appear outside of a defense lawyer claiming then recanting it. That same lawyer, though, said Trump was cooperative. 

 

And those are the facts as we know them. Millions of Trump cultists yelling from the rooftops that TRUMP BANNED EPSTEIN FROM MARALAGO!!!!!! is disingenuous at best and a straight up lie at worst. 

[3rdnlng]

10 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

Of course not!  However, as I previously stated, it's not evidence to prove Trump banned him. That evidence has yet to appear outside of a defense lawyer claiming then recanting it. That same lawyer, though, said Trump was cooperative. 

 

And those are the facts as we know them. Millions of Trump cultists yelling from the rooftops that TRUMP BANNED EPSTEIN FROM MARALAGO!!!!!! is disingenuous at best and a straight up lie at worst. 

Read directly above this post of yours that I'm quoting.

[DC Tom]

2 hours ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/all-we-know-about-the-new-case-against-jeffrey-epstein.html

 

There have been unconfirmed claims that Trump has tried to distance himself from Epstein. According to court documents filed by a lawyer representing three of Epstein’s alleged victims, Trump banned his former friend from Mar-a-Lago because he “sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club.” But the same lawyer later said in an interview that he was unable to confirm that claim, though he did emphasize that Trump was cooperative and helpful as he built his case against Epstein.

 

 

 

Wait just a mother*****ing minute...I've been hearing for two years that court filings are facts, because as court filings lying in them is perjury, so they should be treated as factual.

 

But now, just today, court filings are no longer facts?

 

Just ***** off with this bull####, you #resistance idiots.  Stop making up rules as you go along for your own convenience.  

Edited July 19, 2019 by DC Tom

[McGee Return TD]

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Wait just a mother*****ing minute...I've been hearing for two years that court filings are facts, because as court filings lying in them is perjury, so they should be treated as factual.

 

But now, just today, court filings are no longer facts?

 

Just ***** off with this bull####, you #resistance idiots.  Stop making up rules as you go along for your own convenience.  

 

lol

 

butthurt much old man and the sea?

 

Take a chill pill, it's Friday

 

Even your local alt-right paper couches the claim - https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/12/trump-confirms-epstein-banned-mar-a-lago/

 

Trump All But Confirms Epstein Was Banned From Mar-A-Lago, Says It’s Proof He Has ‘Good Taste’

"All But Confirms" - because it ain't confirmed

[Foxx]

4 minutes ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

lol

 

butthurt much old man and the sea?

 

Take a chill pill, it's Friday

 

Even your local alt-right paper couches the claim - https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/12/trump-confirms-epstein-banned-mar-a-lago/

 

Trump All But Confirms Epstein Was Banned From Mar-A-Lago, Says It’s Proof He Has ‘Good Taste’

"All But Confirms" - because it ain't confirmed

you're an idiot.

[McGee Return TD]

5 minutes ago, Foxx said:

you're an idiot.

 

[njbuff]

3 hours ago, Foxx said:

you're an idiot.

 

Not even.

[plenzmd1]

3 hours ago, DC Tom said:

 

Wait just a mother*****ing minute...I've been hearing for two years that court filings are facts, because as court filings lying in them is perjury, so they should be treated as factual.

 

But now, just today, court filings are no longer facts?

 

Just ***** off with this bull####, you #resistance idiots.  Stop making up rules as you go along for your own convenience.  

well, if the above is true, Trump has more issues no? The quite says Trump banned him because he sexually assaulted an underage girl at his club. If that is true, is there not some law that says one must report sexual assault of a minor? Is that not problematic? 

[Deranged Rhino]

10 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

well, if the above is true, Trump has more issues no? The quite says Trump banned him because he sexually assaulted an underage girl at his club. If that is true, is there not some law that says one must report sexual assault of a minor? Is that not problematic? 

 

He did report it though (kind of), then later during the investigation/pre-trail phase he volunteered information. We'll never know, but I do wonder if the trial had happened back then if Trump would have testified... (shrug)

Edited July 19, 2019 by Deranged Rhino
clarity

[plenzmd1]

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

He did report it though, then later during the investigation/pre-trail phase he volunteered information. We'll never know, but I do wonder if the trial had happened back then if Trump would have testified... (shrug)

to who? once the lawyer in a civil case came on a knocking on his door? The very night he banned Epstein, you are saying he called the police to report a sexual assault or a minor? I have never heard that befoire

[Deranged Rhino]

2 minutes ago, plenzmd1 said:

to who? once the lawyer in a civil case came on a knocking on his door? The very night he banned Epstein, you are saying he called the police to report a sexual assault or a minor? I have never heard that befoire

 

There are too many variables to take that kind of position though. First let's agree that (to my knowledge) there aren't any known details about the alleged assault at Mara Largo, so everything to follow is speculation: We don't really know the nature of the alleged assault -- it could have been anything from a suggestive comment to a literal physical assault. I think you'd agree that the appropriate response would vary between those two ends of the spectrum. But let's say it was a physical assault --   

 

Even then, Trump wasn't the victim. He was the owner of the place where the assault occurred. The victim was a member/customer of Trump and it would be their call whether or not to file a police report, because doing so would require their minor child to give a report/name to the authorities. That's to say, the club member/customer could have many reasons not to want to report the assault.

 

If that's the case, what could Trump be expected to do? Seems tossing a (supposed) billionaire customer from his club was one of the strongest responses Trump could do without violating the privacy of the victim and her family. 

[plenzmd1]

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

There are too many variables to take that kind of position though. First let's agree that (to my knowledge) there aren't any known details about the alleged assault at Mara Largo, so everything to follow is speculation: We don't really know the nature of the alleged assault -- it could have been anything from a suggestive comment to a literal physical assault. I think you'd agree that the appropriate response would vary between those two ends of the spectrum. But let's say it was a physical assault --   

 

Even then, Trump wasn't the victim. He was the owner of the place where the assault occurred. The victim was a member/customer of Trump and it would be their call whether or not to file a police report, because doing so would require their minor child to give a report/name to the authorities. That's to say, the club member/customer could have many reasons not to want to report the assault.

 

If that's the case, what could Trump be expected to do? Seems tossing a (supposed) billionaire customer from his club was one of the strongest responses Trump could do without violating the privacy of the victim and her family. 

couple of things here,,  @DC Tom was stating if it was in a court filing, it must be fact or else that lawyer could be nailed for perjury. Back then, sexual assault did not mean "suggestive comment", it meant sexual assault. Granted who the hell knows what in means now, but back then i think it was pretty clear.

 

2) If a sexual assault occurred, on ones commercial property,( prolly any prperty, but i digress)  i think it is incumbent the owner of said property report that to the police. The victim can then decline to cooperate or not, certainly her choice. No names would come out

 

BTW, i may be wrong but think the victim was masseuse employed  by mar a lago...and going on memory there. A young girl intimidated by a rich powerful older man is a tale as old as time, maybe Trump standing behind her would have given her the confidence to come forward.

 

 Seems weird that a 16 year old would be employed as a masseuse, but lord knows.

 

Also, back to your claim he reported it...i have seen  no evidence of that

[DC Tom]

1 hour ago, plenzmd1 said:

couple of things here,,  @DC Tom was stating if it was in a court filing, it must be fact or else that lawyer could be nailed for perjury.

 

No, I was stating that's what I've heard for the past two years.  And the people saying it have suddenly changed their tune...today.  

 

The only declarative statement I'm making is that people are ***** hypocrites.  

[Bob in Mich]

Chris Cuomo of CNN makes some good points about Trump's lying and as importantly, his enablers.   I know how revered CNN is here but check out the video clip anyway.  It is about 5 minutes long.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONFGgSQb7Os

 

[row_33]

On 7/19/2019 at 8:07 PM, DC Tom said:

 

No, I was stating that's what I've heard for the past two years.  And the people saying it have suddenly changed their tune...today.  

 

The only declarative statement I'm making is that people are ***** hypocrites.  

 

they think they are logical and objective on all opinions

 

but like everyone else they give a free pass to people they admire or like or have to put up with