Jump to content

Bi-Partisan Support For Impeachment


Recommended Posts

So, he testifies to one thing, the "transcripts" gets released and he has an "oopsie" moment and goes back and changes his testimony. <_<

Link to article.
 

A key witness in the House impeachment inquiry has changed his testimony to reveal that he told a ranking Ukrainian official that the country probably would not get nearly $400 million in US military aid unless it announced investigations that President Trump wanted.
 

In the updated testimony, Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union — and one of the “three amigos” running Trump’s Ukraine policy — said he had discussed the request with Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky at a Sept. 1 meeting between Vice President Pence and Zelensky in Warsaw.

Zelensky had also discussed the aid with Pence, Sondland said.
 

“I said that resumption of the US aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Sondland said in the document.

 

</snip>
 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

So, he testifies to one thing, the "transcripts" gets released and he has an "oopsie" moment and goes back and changes his testimony. <_<

Link to article.
 

A key witness in the House impeachment inquiry has changed his testimony to reveal that he told a ranking Ukrainian official that the country probably would not get nearly $400 million in US military aid unless it announced investigations that President Trump wanted.
 

In the updated testimony, Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union — and one of the “three amigos” running Trump’s Ukraine policy — said he had discussed the request with Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to President Volodymyr Zelensky at a Sept. 1 meeting between Vice President Pence and Zelensky in Warsaw.

Zelensky had also discussed the aid with Pence, Sondland said.
 

“I said that resumption of the US aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks,” Sondland said in the document.

 

</snip>
 

 

"updated testimony"

I'm calling bull^%$&, pardon my french. 

This is exactly what Trump says it is, a lynch mob.

 

Edited by Albwan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crumbling: Yet Another Poll on Impeachment Inquiry Raises Serious Red Flags About Schiff’s Show Trial Charade

 

Democrats might be under the impression that a majority of voters are on their side when it comes to impeaching President Trump, but a new poll indicates that what support they do have is starting to crumble.

 

Morning Consult reports:

 

 

 

https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2019/11/06/crumbling-yet-another-poll-impeachment-inquiry-raises-serious-red-flags-schiffs-show-trial-charade/

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, B-Man said:

Crumbling: Yet Another Poll on Impeachment Inquiry Raises Serious Red Flags About Schiff’s Show Trial Charade

 

Democrats might be under the impression that a majority of voters are on their side when it comes to impeaching President Trump, but a new poll indicates that what support they do have is starting to crumble.

 

Morning Consult reports:

 

 

 

https://www.redstate.com/sister-toldjah/2019/11/06/crumbling-yet-another-poll-impeachment-inquiry-raises-serious-red-flags-schiffs-show-trial-charade/

Pelosi & Schiff have nothing on Trump but they are raising expectations by continuing on with this farce. Their rules seem designed to give him an unfair impeachment hearing. I say let it happen and get to a trial in the Senate. Do not even request a dismissal. Have the trial and get all of the witnesses to testify. When the public sees what Pelosi, Schiff & Company tried to pull off there will be a lot of embarrassed dems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what it's about... 

 

 

 

Who thinks Swalwell is right? A president has every right to fire or hire any ambassador he wishes. He gets to set foreign policy, not the unelected bureaucrats who protect serial pedophiles in their spare time. 

 

@Bob in Mich and @Gary Busey think this guy is a champion for truth and reason. 

 

That says all you need to know about these asshats.  

  • Thank you (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

This is what it's about... 

 

 

 

Who thinks Swalwell is right? A president has every right to fire or hire any ambassador he wishes. He gets to set foreign policy, not the unelected bureaucrats who protect serial pedophiles in their spare time. 

 

@Bob in Mich and @Gary Busey think this guy is a champion for truth and reason. 

 

That says all you need to know about these asshats.  

For political reasons, I.e. She wasn't helping Trump cheat on the 2020 election, Swallwell is so obviously correct, I mean Duh! 

2 minutes ago, Gary Busey said:

Untitled1.thumb.gif.45fb87795f986eaf81efdcc461c12d56.gif

Yup! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Schiff Calls His First Public Witnesses and It Tells Us Everything

F858D796-C978-4DA0-B725-BF4EDC0FFD1E.thumb.jpeg.889102a86077928be8e70cc7afbde4d9.jpeg

Public hearings are finally about to begin in Adam Schiff’s “impeachment inquiry” and he’s called his first three witnesses. Who he’s choosing to march out first tells you everything about the game the Democrats are trying to play.

 

The names? Bill Taylor, Marie Yovanovitch, and George Kent.

 

The problem? Not a single one of these “witnesses” had any direct line to Donald Trump at all. None of them received any order from the President to do anything, by their own admission. Further, nothing in their previous testimony pointed to them having any secondary knowledge of an improper quid pro quo involving Joe Biden.

 

What these witnesses do provide is political fodder. Take Bill Taylor. Despite admitting the only evidence he had for his impressions was an article in The New York Times, he testified that he felt an improper quid pro quo was taking place. In reality, he had nothing to support that except his own gut feeling and he admits that plainly.

 

That’s fine if he wants to go write an opinion piece for some liberal rag. It’s not dispositive of anything in an impeachment case.

 

Former Amb. Marie Yovanovitch is another witness big on flash but low on relevancy. Her only use to Schiff is to proclaim she felt targeted by Trump and that he wanted her out of her position (something well within his power). In her past testimony, she says she had no knowledge of any quid pro quo arrangement, so what is she going to actually add of value? The answer is nothing.

 

As for George Kent, his contribution is to claim he was sidelined from policy altogether, which is apparently impeachable because bureaucrats run the country or something. And that’s really what this continues to boil down to, which is a bunch of bureaucrats mad that Donald Trump actually gets to make his own foreign policy and isn’t subservient to the established order within these agencies.

 

 

More at the link

 

https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2019/11/06/adam-schiff-calls-first-public-witnesses-tells-us-everything/

 

 

 
  • Like (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

omfg!

 

it's Schifty goddamned trial and unless you play by his rules you will not get to play with his ball.  what a absolute, complete clown show this has become.

 

the R's should really start to adopt a different approach here. they should simply ignore what the Donner's are doing in their star chamber. let them do whatever the ***** hell they want because they are going to do it anyways. let them show the people what they are and when the articles of impeachment are referred to the Senate, then we can have a real trial and show the American public just how dubious these ***** are.

 

can you imagine House impeachment proceedings with no R's. you might say that that would not be a good thing. my contention would be that the ***** show would be short because they would wrap things up rather fast then we could get to actual truth that much quicker and hang the traitors. and i do mean hang the traitors. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...