Jump to content

Operation Boomerang AG Barr's Investigation of Acts of Treason by Federal Employees


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

????????desperately attampting to muddy the waters.?????

 

Hannity coined the term "Operation Boomerang"

 

Mark Meadows knows what's up

 

Sara Carter is the best investigatory journalist in the land sans TracyBeanz

 

#DaysNotWeeks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, McGee Return TD said:

 

Hannity coined the term "Operation Boomerang"

 

Mark Meadows knows what's up

 

Sara Carter is the best investigatory journalist in the land sans TracyBeanz

 

#DaysNotWeeks

its operation crossfire boomerang.  to reference the high crimes that took place in "operation crossfire hurricane"

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chris farley said:

its operation crossfire boomerang.  to reference the high crimes that took place in "operation crossfire hurricane"

 

:beer: He keeps proving he's not worth the effort or time. 

 

He's ignored the evidence for two + years that it's been shared down here -- not speculations or op-eds, actual verifiable evidence of serious (criminal) abuse of our surveillance systems and courts. Now that it's coming out, his strategy is to make fun of the reporters who have been right from the beginning, despite the cacophony of NPC programmed lemmings screaming "BUT RUSSIA!!!!"

 

He's not a serious person. He's not interested in having a discussion. He just wants to troll from his (many) accounts because it makes him feel better about himself. 

 

It''d be funny if it weren't so darned sad. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

That fits several people here.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

 

Yeah well, ***** you! The Bills WILL win it all this year, if the refs don't ***** them out of wins again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris farley said:

“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are
presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new
evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is
extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it
is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize,
ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with the core belief.”

Frantz Fanon

 

 

 

Fanon.....  :D

 

too bad we can't ask him now to dictate what truth and proof is.....  LOL

 

 

or advocate the murder of everyone in his way

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure about dropping any declassified documents on a Friday dump on a holiday weekend, <_< that is assuming Barr will get them out immediately. Possibly making them sweat the holiday weekend for a  big Tuesday drop, trickle Friday?  Well, clearly "they" need these now. 

 On the other hand, Trump is off to Japan so no one can question him (and he snuck into Arlington today sans press because the press sucks) then off to the UK... interesting times we live in. 



Ok, this is from early this morning (phased declassifications). Gonna be a hot summer in Washington, DC
 

 

  • Like (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

I am not sure about dropping any declassified documents on a Friday dump on a holiday weekend, <_< that is assuming Barr will get them out immediately. Possibly making them sweat the holiday weekend for a  big Tuesday drop, trickle Friday?  Well, clearly "they" need these now. 

 On the other hand, Trump is off to Japan so no one can question him (and he snuck into Arlington today sans press because the press sucks) then off to the UK... interesting times we live in. 



Ok, this is from early this morning (phased declassifications). Gonna be a hot summer in Washington, DC
 

 

 

I was just given a little update by two different people I trust -- one who may or may not have done some of the investigative stuff personally -- that it's going to be released in stages as well. Was led to believe they're going to start with exculpatory evidence first on Page/G-Pop, including a reveal of multiple Page FISAs beyond the one from October 2016. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Here's Schiff's spin

 

 

I asked myself if only one of these bad actors was going to get serious prison time who would I want it to be? Brennan>Schiff>Clapper>Comey>Brennan>Schiff>Clapper>Comey. I had no answer.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I asked myself if only one of these bad actors was going to get serious prison time who would I want it to be? Brennan>Schiff>Clapper>Comey>Brennan>Schiff>Clapper>Comey. I had no answer.

 

For me it would be Brennan -- with Clapper second and Comey third. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I asked myself if only one of these bad actors was going to get serious prison time who would I want it to be? Brennan>Schiff>Clapper>Comey>Brennan>Schiff>Clapper>Comey. I had no answer.

Schiff definitely for a double life sentence.  

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Here's Schiff's spin

 

 

Ah, now it makes sense.  The Attorney General investigating a multi-year sting based in part on the wild accusations of a disgraced foreign national, the potential question of fraud being perpetrated on the FISA court, countless Dem politicians providing sound bite after delicious sound bite guaranteeing the American people they have personally seen damning evidence of Trumplusion, which results in the tearing apart of the fabric of America and faith in its government, which ends up with a big fat goose egg on the underlying investigative question---THAT is unAmerican.  

 

This guy is a disgrace, a political sociopath who need to be relieved of his duties. 

  • Like (+1) 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Ah, now it makes sense.  The Attorney General investigating a multi-year sting based in part on the wild accusations of a disgraced foreign national, the potential question of fraud being perpetrated on the FISA court, countless Dem politicians providing sound bite after delicious sound bite guaranteeing the American people they have personally seen damning evidence of Trumplusion, which results in the tearing apart of the fabric of America and faith in its government, which ends up with a big fat goose egg on the underlying investigative question---THAT is unAmerican.  

 

This guy is a disgrace, a political sociopath who need to be relieved of his duties. 

 

Yup... and he's head of the intel committee. 

 

Terrifying. 

 

AND Gang of 8.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

No NSA or DNI ... (because they've been working with the counterintelligence crew from the start)

 

Isn't the NSA part of the DOD? The Secretary of Defense was listed.

 

Edit: Sorry, I was reading a separate Paul Sperry tweet and conflated it with this one.

 

Second edit: I've been sitting here with a drink or 3 and a huge smile on my face for the last few hours.

 

1945638605_Trump-ItsHapppening.JPG.d537a9ad8b32238477729a23be659b16.JPG

Edited by Hedge
  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

Isn't the NSA part of the DOD? The Secretary of Defense was listed.

 

Edit: Sorry, I was reading a separate Paul Sperry tweet and conflated it with this one.

 

Second edit: I've been sitting here with a drink or 3 and a huge smile on my face for the last few hours.

 

:beer: 

 

If I wasn't under a deadline for a work project, I'd be joining you in those drinks... but can only do that while editing.

 

Related image

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

If I wasn't under a deadline for a work project, I'd be joining you in those drinks... but can only do that while editing.

 

 

Now I know why so many publication mistakes make it through!

:beer:

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...