Foxx Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 3 hours ago, Tiberius said: Lol, he should be welcoming this chance, but he's not. Trump is scared. do you ever get tired of being wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 42 minutes ago, Foxx said: do you ever get tired of being wrong? Hell, being wrong puts him in his comfort zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 6, 2019 Share Posted May 6, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 15 hours ago, Foxx said: Trump should welcome Mueller's testimony. You guys and Trump have been claiming the report clears that idiot, so what's all the fear about? Oh ya, it might confuse the lies Trump has told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoCal Deek Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 1 hour ago, Tiberius said: Trump should welcome Mueller's testimony. You guys and Trump have been claiming the report clears that idiot, so what's all the fear about? Oh ya, it might confuse the lies Trump has told. Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 20 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? The real problem, and the reason that the Democrats need Mueller to testify, is that there were no interactive pop-ups in his report. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 37 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? they are there to act like a two year old denied a cookie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 31 minutes ago, SoCal Deek said: Mueller must be a horrible writer, or the Dems are really slow readers if they need the author to come in and explain his 400 page novel. Was the plot that difficult to follow? Did they need more pictures? Maybe a set of crayons? A picture is worth a thousand words, right? Did you read the report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Same old playbook.......... 1. We're totally innocent2. Mistakes were made3. You're damn right we did it and here's why <== YOU ARE HERE4. A Republican did something vaguely similar decades ago5. Why are obsessed conservatives still talking about this old news? . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 20 minutes ago, B-Man said: Same old playbook.......... 1. We're totally innocent2. Mistakes were made3. You're damn right we did it and here's why <== YOU ARE HERE4. A Republican did something vaguely similar decades ago5. Why are obsessed conservatives still talking about this old news? . He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RochesterRob Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 8 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you Just give it up already. Nobody is accepting your biased word anyhow. Tell us about the noon gruel that is served at the Soros Cubicle Farm to keep your mind compliant to your leftist masters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 22 minutes ago, RochesterRob said: Just give it up already. Nobody is accepting your biased word anyhow. Tell us about the noon gruel that is served at the Soros Cubicle Farm to keep your mind compliant to your leftist masters. we are only here to bearbait fools that think the 2016 election will be overturned actually they are more like a sad animal that would enjoy get poked by sticks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wacka Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 30 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you No matter how many times you replay it, Norwood's kick will still be wide right by a foot ir two. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, Tiberius said: He obstructed justice, accepted Russian interference and might still be. And your unAmerican Ass cares nothing about it. Shame on you For what? He's the president of the United States. He's got the power of law enforcement, the military, the intelligence community, and the Treasury at his fingertips, plus a pen and a phone. What does he need Russian assistance for, borscht recipes? Those three words, "might still be," would illustrate the depths of your derangement, if you were paying attention to yourself: even if he had it before, Trump doesn't need any Russian assistance now. He perfectly capable of oppressing your sorry ass without Russian assistance. And you can still spew that nonsense. What would that mean to a normal, rational adult person? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 13 minutes ago, DC Tom said: For what? He's the president of the United States. He's got the power of law enforcement, the military, the intelligence community, and the Treasury at his fingertips, plus a pen and a phone. What does he need Russian assistance for, borscht recipes? Those three words, "might still be," would illustrate the depths of your derangement, if you were paying attention to yourself: even if he had it before, Trump doesn't need any Russian assistance now. He perfectly capable of oppressing your sorry ass without Russian assistance. And you can still spew that nonsense. What would that mean to a normal, rational adult person? To win in 2020. Anyone, like you, that thinks this criminal won't use the help of the criminal dictator...wait, no one would believe he wouldn't. You just don't care. That's why you make up your bull sh it arguments in defense of him. Shame on you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Operation boomerang Quote FBI Director Christopher Wray said Tuesday that he wouldn’t use the term “spying” to describe lawful FBI investigative activities in response to a question about Attorney General William Barr's controversial use of the word at a hearing last month. “Well, that’s not the term I would use,” Wray said at a Senate hearing when asked about Barr's use of the term to describe the FBI’s surveillance of members of the Trump campaign during the 2016 presidential election. Wray went on to emphasize the importance of ensuring that any surveillance is done consistent with the law. “Well, I mean, look, lots of people have different colloquial phrases. I believe that the FBI is engaged in investigative activity and part of investigative activity includes surveillance activity of different shapes and sizes,” Wray told Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). “To me, the key question is making sure that it is done by the book, consistent with our lawful authorities," Wray said. “That’s the key question. Different people use different colloquial phrases.” https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/442454-fbi-director-says-he-wouldnt-use-spying-to-describe-fbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 His perp walk will be a highlight of 2019. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McGee Return TD Posted May 7, 2019 Share Posted May 7, 2019 Is this only known as Operation Boomerang here in PPP and QANON Twitter/8/4/Chan? I can't find any reputable source claiming Barr has termed this investigation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts