Jump to content

Is Tom Brady A Cheater?


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Definitive?  Maybe not.

 

It comes from mainly 2 places.

 

1. In an interview with Doug Flutie saying he was surprised while listening to his helmet on the sidelines that the communications continued after the 15 second cut off.  

 

2. Peyton Manning and others have said that in critical points in games at the Razor the radio would cut out.  Who can forget Mike Tomlin getting the Pasties** radio broadcast through his headset?  A high tech stadium in a high tech city can't seem to get the radio thing figured out somehow.

A high tech stadium in a high tech town... Can surely find a high tech hacker to nab a wireless connection.

 

Go back to the cord and the kid holding the wire for the coach.

 

Any coincidence when the League "cut the cord" the Cheaters have a meteoric rise...

 

Mix in idiot savant Ernie Adams in the booth and they got gold. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much shadiness throughout their entire run to not believe that it is not completely legit. Heck, we have proof that at least a few things were done that were not on the up and up.

 

And I’ll never believe that any opposing team going into Foxboro is playing on a level with them. There is always something going on there...whether it’s the refs or radio transmissions, or whatever...it’s shady business over there.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2019 at 4:51 PM, LSHMEAB said:

Meh. He's a guy constantly looking for a competitive advantage and probably crosses the line.

 

He's the best quarterback I've ever seen play. Didn't seem to affect him when they inflated his balls.

 

That being said, the end is nigh. 

I didnt rob the bank your honor.  I have a account I was just overdrafting my account with a gun in my hand.

Edited by formerlyofCtown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2019 at 10:43 PM, Alphadawg7 said:

Honestly don't really follow what you are saying here.  So I am going to take my best stab here at responding, but honestly this feels a bit incoherent and genuinely am not sure what you are trying to say.

 

 

Isn't the point of a message board to enter into threads and conversations?  So seems like a senseless point to start this paragraph off.

 

Are you trying to say Jerry Rice didn't use Stick-em on his gloves?  If so, try a google search because he did and openly admits to it.

 

I don't even know what you are talking about in terms of Beane and our own WR position in this thread about the Pats.  How you worked that into this, not really sure, and not really sure what your point on it is either.  You are apparently accusing me of some kind of statement regarding Beane and WR's, but I need some kind of Cracker Jack decoder ring to figure it out off this sentence.  Happy to address it, but no idea what you are talking about.

 

 

Are you trying to imply I am somehow saying Jerry Rice was only great because of Stick-em?  If you are, then you are wrong because I did NOT say that nor do I think that.  Jerry Rice was the GOAT at WR.  I brought up Jerry Rice and stick em to point out the hypocrisy of those discrediting Brady over something as minor and stupid as "deflate-gate" yet they dont do the same to Jerry Rice even though Jerry used an illegal substance on his gloves over his whole career.  

 

Everyone still believes Jerry to be the GOAT, and rightfully so, and so do I.  Just like I believe Brady to be the GOAT.  But if you are going to play the scorned Bills fan and discredit Brady, then you need to be unbiased and discredit Jerry who admits to cheating against NFL rules over his career.  

 

I personally dont discredit either of them, they are great because they are better than everyone at their position and out work everyone else.  

 

 

Lost me here...first thought that comes to mind is "Duh" of course opinions are face value.  Your next line makes no sense and throws the whole 2 sentences off though and I have no idea what you are trying to say. 

Jerry Rice could play in any generation, Tom Brady could not.  He would not have survived in the days before "limited contact with WR an QBs."  He may not even be the greatest of his generation but absolutely plays on the GOAT NFL team and for the GAOT Coach.

SuperBowls are a team accomplishment so you can save it.  Otherwise Dilfer is a greater QB than Marino and Kelly.

Edited by formerlyofCtown
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Nextmanup said:

Did anyone here closely follow NCAA men's basketball in the '60s and '70s?

 

I'm wondering if it was common back then to accuse John Wooden and UCLA of cheating in the manner we hear about all the time now with New England.

 

 

              Back then I had a joke with my friends.   Name the two best teams in College Basketball?   Number one was UCLA, number two was the UCLA bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, reddogblitz said:

 

Definitive?  Maybe not.

 

It comes from mainly 2 places.

 

1. In an interview with Doug Flutie saying he was surprised while listening to his helmet on the sidelines that the communications continued after the 15 second cut off.  

 

2. Peyton Manning and others have said that in critical points in games at the Razor the radio would cut out.  Who can forget Mike Tomlin getting the Pasties** radio broadcast through his headset?  A high tech stadium in a high tech city can't seem to get the radio thing figured out somehow.

Unfortunately this is a lot of nothing as it stands, then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said:

Jerry Rice could play in any generation, Tom Brady could not.  He would not have survived in the days of "limited contact with WR an QBs.  He may not even be the greatest of his generation but absolutely plays on the GOAT NFL team and for the GAOT Coach.

SuperBowls are a teamaccomplishment so you can save it.  Otherwise Dilfer is a greater QB than Marino and Kelly.

Go read what the Giants players said about Brady after beating the snot out of him the Super Bowl.  He might like to whine to the refs and cuss his o-line out, but it's nonsense to suggest he couldn't have succeeded in a different era.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

.....Jesus....enough already...........

Tom Brady’s name appears 17 times in the Super Bowl record book

Posted by Michael David Smith on January 26, 2019, 7:32 AM EST
 
Patriots quarterback Tom Brady‘s name is all over the Super Bowl record book.
 
We took a look at the Patriots’ records in the Super Bowl section of the 2018 NFL Record & Fact Book, and Brady appears a whopping 17 times. As you probably know, he owns the record for most Super Bowls played (eight so far, with a ninth coming up), and all the career passing records. But Brady’s name is in the record book for even more records than most fans would realize: He has the record for most passes without an interception in a Super Bowl, with 48 — and he’s done that twice, in Super Bowl XLII and in Super Bowl LII.
 
The full list of Patriots Super Bowl records is here.
 
 
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Iron Maiden said:

Yes, they cheated....but it's not the reason they've been dominating the NFL for 20 years....Cameras at illegal spots( 12-13 years ago ) and deflated balls ( still think that one is stupid ) is what some cling onto only because they kick our teams ass so often...and somehow, cannot give any credit to NE....let's face it, they are the greatest dynasty in football, and we'll never see something like that again...Brady is the GOAT and so is BB...that's why they are dominating...it's actually pretty simple....

 

They out prepare teams who are often more talented....they are disciplined and rarely make mistakes....and when you do, they pounce on you and make you pay....I can't wait for it to end...but they are that good.....

The deflated balls one is a lot bigger than you think. We don't know when they started doing it but look at Benjarvus Green-Ellis and his time with the Patriots. From 2008 to 2011 zero fumbles with the Patriots and with just 2 years with the Bengals 5 fumbles  with 4 lost. Turnovers are one of the biggest factors in winning or losing so I think the deflated ball bull#### isn't stupid at all.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2019 at 10:53 AM, stony said:

Go read what the Giants players said about Brady after beating the snot out of him the Super Bowl.  He might like to whine to the refs and cuss his o-line out, but it's nonsense to suggest he couldn't have succeeded in a different era.  

Lol didnt matter where you got hit back then.  There is a reason it wasnt common to play to 40 in those days. You are obviously a younger person.  Edelman and welker would have got ended over the middle.  There was no such thing as a defenseless Reciever.  They didnt have all these rules.  Those guys on the NYG team are not Bruce Smith, Lawrence Tayler, Mike Singeltary and Steve Atwater.  to name a few.  Gregg Williams got Suspended for doing what was normal back then.

Edited by formerlyofCtown
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2019 at 3:42 PM, Mango said:

 

 

Huh? It’s not a consipieacy theory. It was reported as part of spygate. His helmet mic never shut off inside 15”/ at the LoS. Doug Flutie mentioned that it surprised him when he accidentally grabbed Toms helmet one game. 

 

Tom Brady has always been good at seeing the field, but his learning curve was very different from every other QB in the league. There’s a very real argument to be made that he is exponentially better at it because of his “upbringing”. 

 

There is 100 links to this story from reputable sources, but I’ll drop one. 

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/from-cheating-claims-to-trash-talking-steelers-patriots-rivalry-full-of-bad-blood/

 

Real world example. You graduate from UNC with your MBA. Very good program, but it’s no Chicago, Harvard, or Wharton. You do well. You’re not top of your class but in the 5-10 range. 

 

You get a mid level job with a few of your fellow graduates at Amazon in some mid level supply chain role. You perform well on a few early projects. Bezos takes a liking to you. In fact, makes you the President and CEO. Except while you’re taking over the company, Bezos isn’t just a mentor to bounce ideas off. He’s proof reading all your emails, providing reports and financials, telling you how to handle your PNL’s, and what companies to acquire. Amazon keeps growing. Bezos disappears over some insider trading aligations. But you maintain your position as CEO and President. You do a fine job continuing to grow the company. 

 

Would you be the same President and CEO of you hadn’t had Bezos controlling your every business move for those years? 

 

Thats Tom Brady. Promising, talented, driven, but with an advantage when it comes to learning on the job that created who he is today. 

 

He is the GOAT, hands down, not close. I just question how he got there.

 

Deflate gate was dumb BTW. I’m more upset by the underhandedness more than I am the result of the act. If you want to try and sneak by the refs when they check. Whatever. But if don’t systematically pull a fast one. 

Fully appreciate the depth of this explanation, but I assume BB had been skirting the "law" for years. Didn't seem to help Bledsoe in 00 or even the first two games in 01. 

 

Not sure the technology was available when he was in Cleveland.

Edited by LSHMEAB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, formerlyofCtown said:

Lol didnt matter where you got hit back then.  There is a reason it wasnt common to play to 40 in those days. You are obviously a younger person.  Edelman and welker would have got ended over the middle.  There was no such thong as a defenseless Reciever.  They didnt have all these rules.  Those guys on the NYG team are not Bruce Smith, Lawrence Tayler, Mike Singeltary and Steve Atwater.  to name a few.  Gregg Williams got Suspended for doing what was normal back then.

Talent is talent, that's my point.  It transcends eras.  If you want to debate whether he'd still be going strong on the wrong side of 40, that's fine.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stony said:

Talent is talent, that's my point.  It transcends eras.  If you want to debate whether he'd still be going strong on the wrong side of 40, that's fine.  

Hes talented.  His body would have never held up.  He would not have been protected the way he is and would not have the fabricated stats they all have these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2019 at 3:42 PM, Mango said:

Huh? It’s not a consipieacy theory. It was reported as part of spygate. His helmet mic never shut off inside 15”/ at the LoS. Doug Flutie mentioned that it surprised him when he accidentally grabbed Toms helmet one game. 

 

Tom Brady has always been good at seeing the field, but his learning curve was very different from every other QB in the league. There’s a very real argument to be made that he is exponentially better at it because of his “upbringing”. 

 

There is 100 links to this story from reputable sources, but I’ll drop one. 

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/from-cheating-claims-to-trash-talking-steelers-patriots-rivalry-full-of-bad-blood

 

To me, the most  compelling part of the Spygate book was the last chapter.  It talks about the statistics of things like wins and home wins and beating the spread.  (i know TBDers love statistics). The Patsies** are soooooooo far ahead of the curve in regards to the other 31 teams.  Statisticians who reviewed the data blind questioned if they were really an equal member of the group.

 

Take perfect seasons at home witb Brady for example. He has more than Troy Aikmen, Kurt Warner, Jim Kelly, Peyton Manning, and Dan Mariono COMBINED. All HOF QBs or soon to be.

 

If you are an NFL fan, you should read that.book.  It is not just a sore loser rant as is often portrayed.  It is instead based on facts and statistical analysis.

 

They HAVE been busted twice and their success is so far out of the ballpark statistically in regards to the rest of the league.  If you want to believe it is because they are just so much smarter and better than everyone else, go for it.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...