Jump to content
Binghamton Beast

New York State abortion bill now allows babies, At any point of pregnancy, to be aborted

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BringBackOrton said:

I won't be celebrating. New York is Gomorrah. 

 

No question, but sometimes you have to lose a battle to win a war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My views on abortion have evolved over the years, but it's always struck me that most sane, reasonable people are pro-life at some point. The bigger question seemed to be "when does life really commence"?  I guess that's been answered now...life begins at first light. Disgusting, pathetic and sad on a crimes against humanity level. 

 

Ironically, too, it's a man who signs this bill into law. 

Edited by leh-nerd skin-erd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No matter what your view is on abortion, you shouldn't be cheering any pro abortion law like what was reported.

  • Like (+1) 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They felt the need to turn the wtc pink for this?? I need to move out of this state 

 

Question - so if a pregnant lady is murdered does that mean a guy can’t be charged with two counts of murder now? (Not that that’s an important part of this, just wondering if that not a live until born could have other implications)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting comments on here

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said:

They felt the need to turn the wtc pink for this?? I need to move out of this state 

 

Question - so if a pregnant lady is murdered does that mean a guy can’t be charged with two counts of murder now? (Not that that’s an important part of this, just wondering if that not a live until born could have other implications)

 

 

I'm not sure, but I know our local State Senator, Cathy Young, tried to sponsor an add-on bill that would exempt the situation, where a domestic violence victim lost the baby.

 

but the democrats said no.

 

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I'm not sure, but I know our local State Senator, Cathy Young, tried to sponsor an add-on bill that would exempt the situation, where a domestic violence victim lost the baby.

 

but the democrats said no.

 

 

.

 

Sounds like if they said no to that that the no would seem to extend to all cases then

 

You got a site that shows how the vote went? I will need to file that information away for next election

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Sounds like if they said no to that that the no would seem to extend to all cases then

 

You got a site that shows how the vote went? I will need to file that information away for next election

 

How would your vote be changed?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

The legislation provides a further exception to permit abortion at any point during pregnancy if a health-care practitioner deems it necessary for the mother’s life or health — the exception that was defined in Roe companion case Doe v. Bolton as “all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age — relevant to the wellbeing of the patient.” In other words, abortion will be available to women essentially on demand up to the point of birth.

 

The RHA will also decriminalize abortion, moving it from the state’s criminal code to the public-health code.

 

The Reproductive Health Act strips abortions from the penal code and adds the following language:

"The legislature finds that comprehensive reproductive health care is a fundamental component of every individual's health, privacy and equality.

"Therefore, it is the policy of the state that:

"Every individual has the fundamental right to choose or refuse contraception or sterilization. Every individual who becomes pregnant has the fundamental right to choose to carry the pregnancy to term, to give birth to a child, or to have an abortion, pursuant to this article." 

Cuomo wants to go even further, saying earlier this month that abortion rights should be added to the state constitution.

 

 

The new law will allow a licensed "health-care practitioner" acting under their scope of practice to perform an abortion when:

"According to the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional judgment based on the facts of the patient's case: the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient's life or health."

So the measure will make late-term abortions legal at the discretion of a health-care practitioner based on the viability of the fetus or if the woman's life or health is in jeopardy.

And the act will codify Roe v. Wade protections into state law if the case were to be overturned by the Supreme Court, which Cuomo cited as the main reason for needing the new state law.

 

"That's why we had to pass this law, to protect our state," Cuomo said at his bill signing. "And that's why I believe we have to go even a step further and do a constitutional amendment."

 

Prior state law only allowed physicians to perform abortions.

 

https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/politics/albany/2019/01/22/abortion-laws-new-york-how-they-change-immediately/2643065002/

@Gugny. Try reading this. We can go back to class tomorrow, I'll let you know what time it'll begin. We can only hope you learn something from the better man (me).

 

29 minutes ago, Doc Brown said:

No matter what your view is on abortion, you shouldn't be cheering any pro abortion law like what was reported.

Glad you missed the gleeful shoutbox lowIQ crowd this evening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, row_33 said:

 

How would your vote be changed?

 

Depends on how my rep voted, if they supported this ***** they don’t get my vote.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Bray Wyatt said:

 

Depends on how my rep voted, if they supported this ***** they don’t get my vote.

 

 

Fair enough, shouldn’t have possibly put you on the spot there....

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even liberals have to be offended by this, what's next, euthanasia for the elderly because they've become a burden? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Bray Wyatt said:

They felt the need to turn the wtc pink for this??

 

A nod to Planned Parenthood, who undoubtedly paid for the NY majority needed to pass the law to increase their customer base.

 

More money to PP = more money to the Dem campaign coffers. Think of all the fresh, young body parts they can sell.

 

Where are you PPP leftists? Share your joy with the rest of your party.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, B-Man said:

Prior state law only allowed physicians to perform abortions.

 

Ah hell, what can go wrong when you let people who aren't medical doctors perform invasive surgical procedures?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don’t have a law as jury nullification was the result of our last trials on the issue

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

A nod to Planned Parenthood, who undoubtedly paid for the NY majority needed to pass the law to increase their customer base.

 

More money to PP = more money to the Dem campaign coffers. Think of all the fresh, young body parts they can sell.

 

Where are you PPP leftists? Share your joy with the rest of your party.

Doesn't PP get a lot of their funding from taxpayers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

Even liberals have to be offended by this, what's next, euthanasia for the elderly because they've become a burden? 

 

They're not offended by this. They're overjoyed. They are all literally celebrating this. There is too much money slicing up babies for them to worry about ethics. Even the "Catholics."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

@Gugny. Try reading this. We can go back to class tomorrow, I'll let you know what time it'll begin. We can only hope you learn something from the better man (me).

 

Glad you missed the gleeful shoutbox lowIQ crowd this evening.

 

When I'm registered like you, we can compare our manhood.  Until then, I win, Gary Glitter.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Gugny said:

 

When I'm registered like you, we can compare our manhood.  Until then, I win, Gary Glitter.

I'm not registered, idiot.  Get yourself up to speed. You'd be amazed at how actually ***** perfect I am.

 

But, avoid the actual article. Avoid learning and intelligence. Continue on NPCGugny.  Your overlords Gov Coumo and Schumer love you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bilzfancy said:

Doesn't PP get a lot of their funding from taxpayers?

 

Yes. We all pay for them to provide the abortions. And then they charge on top of that. That money goes straight to the Dem politician campaigns. They all but paid for Kamala Harris to get elected. They own her after she raided the house pf the guy who had undercover video of their body selling scheme.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

Yes. We all pay for them to provide the abortions. And then they charge on top of that. That money goes straight to the Dem politician campaigns. They all but paid for Kamala Harris to get elected. They own her after she raided the house pf the guy who had undercover video of their body selling scheme.

Wow, that didn’t take long for you to go off on your evil dems crusade!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reason 103,257 that Trump won

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

I'm not sure, but I know our local State Senator, Cathy Young, tried to sponsor an add-on bill that would exempt the situation, where a domestic violence victim lost the baby.

 

but the democrats said no.

 

 

.

 

Sorry, but battered women are far below abortion on the left wing pecking order.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, KD in CA said:

 

Sorry, but battered women are far below abortion on the left wing pecking order.

 

Unless you beat the woman to abort the baby. The Democrats two-fer in NY. Now if they can just find a way to make money off it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, BigMcD said:

Wow, that didn’t take long for you to go off on your evil dems crusade!! 

 

So....you can’t refute anything in his post?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...