Jump to content
Binghamton Beast

New York State abortion bill now allows babies, At any point of pregnancy, to be aborted

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, LBSeeBallLBGetBall said:

Should Americans be forced to live a certain way in order to keep them healthy?

What? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

Crimes that can earn you a lethal injection in New York:

Rape: no

Child abduction: no

Child murder: no

Serial murder: no

Mass shooting: no

Being conceived in the wrong womb: yes

 

Dxp_Si7VsAED7DZ.jpg:large

 

Reminder:

 

The legislation provides a further exception to permit abortion at any point during pregnancy if a health-care practitioner deems it necessary for the mother’s life or health
 
— the exception that was defined in Roe companion case Doe v. Bolton as “all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age — relevant to the wellbeing of the patient.”
 
In other words, abortion will be available to women essentially on demand up to the point of birth.
 
The RHA will also decriminalize abortion, moving it from the state’s criminal code to the public-health code.
 
 
 
 

 

This is no worse than the lies in the Covington nonsense.  It’s not an exception, it’s factors a doctor can look at when decided if it’s neccesaary for the woman’s health.  It is trusting a doctor to make a medical judgment, something we allow them to do.  It is not “on demand.”  That is nonsensical and a lie.

 

how many examples of late term abortions can you show that fall within “on demand” or were not really for a woman’s health.  How common is it?

 

you can disagree with abortion, but don’t post lies.  This only allows late term abortions when the fetus is not viable or if it’s neccesary for health reasons (in in practice, probably both).  You can disagree with those two exceptions on a philosophical, moral, or ethical level...but stop twisting facts regarding what the exceptions actually are.

 

 

also, posting a 1 sentence excerpt of a judicial desision is almost universally misleading.  A pet peeve of mine.  

Edited by Crayola64
  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

They should both just move to Europe. I’ll help pay the movers.

You and Trump and all the rest can move to Russia

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A harsher dose of reality for those who say that Doctors will not abort a viable fetus of 38 weeks because of the "health" reasons listed several times here.

 

If a woman goes to an Abortion Clinic in New York, do you think that she is NOT going to get an abortion ?

 

Do you think that the "Health Care Professional" is going to say......."No, you don't have a good enough reason ?   

 

No, we won't do the procedure...............Who is really in an alternate reality here ?

 

Babies that otherwise could have lived are going to be murdered.

 

You can spin your adoption excuses, your financial reasons, your "forced religion" nonsense, but THAT is the reality.

 

 

 

 

 

.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Not an OBGYN, way too hair-raising for me.

Well, you could always pick up a second gig by doing a little waxing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, B-Man said:

A harsher dose of reality for those who say that Doctors will not abort a viable fetus of 38 weeks because of the "health" reasons listed several times here.

 

If a woman goes to an Abortion Clinic in New York, do you think that she is NOT going to get an abortion ?

 

Do you think that the "Health Care Professional" is going to say......."No, you don't have a good enough reason ?   

 

No, we won't do the procedure...............Who is really in an alternate reality here ?

 

Babies that otherwise could have lived are going to be murdered.

 

You can spin your adoption excuses, your financial reasons, your "forced religion" nonsense, but THAT is the reality.

 

 

 

 

 

.

Why don't you care this much about asylum seekers who just want to live free or death threats? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You and Trump and all the rest can move to Russia

 

Aw, don’t worry tibs. We’ll make sure your mothers basement gets on the truck to Europe. Wouldn’t want you to be homeless.

 

 

p.s. Did you ever admit and apologize about that thing that made you look like a worthless piece of *****?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

Why don't you care this much about asylum seekers who just want to live free or death threats? 

There are probably a few billion people in this world who want a better life or seek asylum, should we let them all in?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Joe in Winslow said:

 

Seeing as I no longer fear nor value the opinions of progressives, I won't let them intimidate me into silence with their witty quips, euphemisms, or likely false anecdotes.

 

They're pro-death. Period. That's what being pro-choice is. It's being pro-death.

 

 

 

I've read many reports that show its just best to keep abortion accessible and legal and so I support that. However, late term abortions short of a valid medical reason are cruel, and nothing short of murder. 

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

This is no worse than the lies in the Covington nonsense.  It’s not an exception, it’s factors a doctor can look at when decided if it’s neccesaary for the woman’s health.  It is trusting a doctor to make a medical judgment, something we allow them to do.  It is not “on demand.”  That is nonsensical and a lie.

 

how many examples of late term abortions can you show that fall within “on demand” or were not really for a woman’s health.  How common is it?

 

 

 

 

As i said above...............the Doctor in the Abortion clinic is there to do abortions.........There is NOT going to be a team meeting to decide what is best

 

IT IS NOT A LIE.

 

The fact that you have to ask if it is commonplace is a dead giveaway of either your ignorance on abortion or your deliberate blindness.

 

 

 

.

 

 

ADDED: Please don't respond to Gator's 🐿️🐿️'s  he keeps trying the same deflection because he can't refute anything else

 

 

 

.

Edited by B-Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, bilzfancy said:

There are probably a few billion people in this world who want a better life or seek asylum, should we let them all in?

 

Yes. And we should provide them with universal education, healthcare, shelter, income, and SNAP cards. We'll just take the money from the 1%. When we run out of their money we're all *****, but hey, at least we're not racists. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

This is no worse than the lies in the Covington nonsense.  It’s not an exception, it’s factors a doctor can look at when decided if it’s neccesaary for the woman’s health.  It is trusting a doctor to make a medical judgment, something we allow them to do.  It is not “on demand.”  That is nonsensical and a lie.

 

how many examples of late term abortions can you show that fall within “on demand” or were not really for a woman’s health.  How common is it?

 

you can disagree with abortion, but don’t post lies.  This only allows late term abortions when the fetus is not viable or if it’s neccesary for health reasons (in in practice, probably both).  You can disagree with those two exceptions on a philosophical, moral, or ethical level...but stop twisting facts regarding what the exceptions actually are.

 

 

also, posting a 1 sentence excerpt of a judicial desision is almost universally misleading.  A pet peeve of mine.  

How long will you hide behind “necessary for health reasons?”

 

Show me the health reasons to poison a late term fetus before delivering to ensure the health of the mother. Please.

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

As i said above...............the Doctor in the Abortion clinic is there to do abortions.........There is NOT going to be a team meeting to decide what is best

 

IT IS NOT A LIE.

 

The fact that you have to ask if it is commonplace is a dead giveaway of either your ignorance on abortion or your deliberate blindness.

 

 

 

.

 

 

ADDED: Please don't respond to Gator's 🐿️🐿️'s  he keeps trying the same deflection because he can't refute anything else

 

 

 

.

 

There’s really nothing to argue about then.  The statute is clear on the two exceptions.  Your argument against it is essentially “you really think doctors are going to abide by it lol?”  My answer is yes, because I trust doctors to do exactly that, and in my experience, they do follow the law and act with integrity.

 

I strongly disagree, and I hope your irrational distrust of doctors only goes as far as where it conveniently fits a political narrative of yours.  Because they do act with integrity, and not having a law based on the assumption they won’t follow it is not a valid reason to attack a law.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

This is no worse than the lies in the Covington nonsense.  It’s not an exception, it’s factors a doctor can look at when decided if it’s neccesaary for the woman’s health.  It is trusting a doctor to make a medical judgment, something we allow them to do.  It is not “on demand.”  That is nonsensical and a lie.

 

how many examples of late term abortions can you show that fall within “on demand” or were not really for a woman’s health.  How common is it?

 

you can disagree with abortion, but don’t post lies.  This only allows late term abortions when the fetus is not viable or if it’s neccesary for health reasons (in in practice, probably both).  You can disagree with those two exceptions on a philosophical, moral, or ethical level...but stop twisting facts regarding what the exceptions actually are.

 

 

also, posting a 1 sentence excerpt of a judicial desision is almost universally misleading.  A pet peeve of mine.  

 

Is your argument then that all abortions should be eliminated at all times except when a doctor says it’s medically necessary?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

How long will you hide behind “necessary for health reasons?”

 

Show me the health reasons to poison a late term fetus before delivering to ensure the health of the mother. Please.

 

 

What do do you mean hide behind it? It’s the exception that permits late term abortions.  If it’s not met, and the fetus is viable for life, a late term abortion still can’t occur.

 

this is the first time anyone’s told me to stop hiding behind what a law plainly says when you are defending the law.  It’s a sign, no offense, that you don’t actually have an argument against it.

Edited by Crayola64

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, whatdrought said:

 

Aw, don’t worry tibs. We’ll make sure your mothers basement gets on the truck to Europe. Wouldn’t want you to be homeless.

 

 

p.s. Did you ever admit and apologize about that thing that made you look like a worthless piece of *****?

A truck to Europe! Ok! 

 

Nothing to apologize for 😘

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow.. I think I’ve been bullying a mentally ######## person.

 

I get why you guys don’t respond to him.

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

 

Is your argument then that all abortions should be eliminated at all times except when a doctor says it’s medically necessary?

 

No, this law sounds reasonable to me.  It allows abortions for any reason for the first 24 week’s (I think).  And then it only allows abortions if the fetus is not viable for life, or if it’s medically necessity.

 

of course we all might disagree on whether an abortion should be done in the first 24 weeks for whatever reason. I 100 percent respect your opinions on abortion, religious, moral, or ethical.  I think it’s ok, but I understand why many are against abortions in the first 24 weeks.

 

i personally would be devastated if a woman got an abortion for no reason early on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, bilzfancy said:

There are probably a few billion people in this world who want a better life or seek asylum, should we let them all in?

A very tiny fraction of them want in, that's all. Why you trying to fuzzy the issue? 

 

Life is life, right? 

 

 

But! Ya, we should be doing more around the world to make life better. Instead of invading Iraq, we could have tried fixing up a "sh** hole country" 

would have been a better investment 

1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

Wow.. I think I’ve been bullying a mentally ######## person.

 

I get why you guys don’t respond to him.

Go drive your truck to Europe you stupid idiot 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Crayola64 said:

What do do you mean hide behind it? It’s the exception that permits late term abortions.  If it’s not met, and the fetus is viable for life, a late term abortion still can’t occur.

 

this is the first time anyone’s told me to stop hiding behind what a law plainly says when you are defending the law.  It’s a sign, no offense, that you don’t sctually have an argument against it.

 

There are no medical scenarios which require a doctor to kill a baby before delivering it for the physical health of the mother.  None.

 

The baby is completely viable in the third term, and is being delivered either way.  Killing is first is 100% elective, and serves no medical purpose.

 

This is precisely the reason "health" was left vague within the law

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Crayola64 said:

 

No, this law sounds reasonable to me.  It allows abortions for any reason for the first 24 week’s (I think).  And then it only allows abortions if the fetus is not viable for life, or if it’s medically necessity.

 

of course we all might disagree on whether an abortion should be done in the first 24 weeks for whatever reason. I 100 percent respect your opinions on abortion, religious, moral, or ethical.  I think it’s ok, but I understand why many are against abortions in the first 24 weeks.

 

i personally would be devastated if a woman got an abortion for no reason early on.

 

The problem that exists is that, if you look at the history of the abortion industry, the “medically” necessary distinction has been a token used at every step to loosen laws and bring about open abortion.

The Democratic Party stands on a platform of abortion anytime, for any reason. Go ask their last presidential nominee.

 

more to the point. It’s wrong at week 1, and it’s wrong at week 41. 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, whatdrought said:

Wow.. I think I’ve been bullying a mentally ######## person.

 

I get why you guys don’t respond to him.

 

If you just throw him on ignore you'd be surprised how much more coherent the conversation can be here. I have probably four or five people on ignore , and yes, at times, you may see an entire page of "You've chosen to ignore content by...", but then you look and see it's conversation between Tibs, The Dude and Exiled and you remember you haven't missed a damn thing.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

If you just throw him on ignore you'd be surprised how much more coherent the conversation can be here. I have probably four or five people on ignore , and yes, at times, you may see an entire page of "You've chosen to ignore content by...", but then you look and see it's conversation between Tibs, The Dude and Exiled and you remember you haven't missed a damn thing.

 

Thats solid advice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

There are no medical scenarios which require a doctor to kill a baby before delivering it for the physical health of the mother.  None.

 

The baby is completely viable in the third term, and is being delivered either way.  Killing is first is 100% elective, and serves no medical purpose.

 

This is precisely the reason "health" was left vague within the law

 

What about a fetus that isn’t viable at 25 weeks.  Could that be a scenario where it’s medically necessary for an abortion to occur?  Sincere question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

 

 

What do do you mean hide behind it? It’s the exception that permits late term abortions.  If it’s not met, and the fetus is viable for life, a late term abortion still can’t occur.

 

this is the first time anyone’s told me to stop hiding behind what a law plainly says when you are defending the law.  It’s a sign, no offense, that you don’t actually have an argument against it.

No, you misunderstand. If you want to argue there is a medical reason for the exception to exist, prove there is a medical reason. Demonstrate a situation in which a late-term fetus must be poisoned before delivery to preserve the physical health of the mother.

Just now, Crayola64 said:

 

What about a fetus that isn’t viable at 25 weeks.  Could that be a scenario where it’s medically necessary for an abortion to occur?  Sincere question.

How do you define “viable?”

 

Why would you ensure it’s not viable by poisoning it? Sincere question. Sounds a lot like the guy in the army movies who shoots a fallen soldier because “they weren’t gonna make it anyway.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...