Gary M Posted June 7, 2019 Share Posted June 7, 2019 1 hour ago, B-Man said: Gary................quit chasing the ?️ ?️ ?️ Sorry, I'm bored Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 7, 2019 Share Posted June 7, 2019 Politicians and lobbyists within that 16% routinely call the 75% "extreme." As do some 'posters' here. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted June 7, 2019 Share Posted June 7, 2019 6 hours ago, BullBuchanan said: Sure, that's cute at all, but it's not relevant. It's not a person. You can watch a BMW being made in the shop and at a certain point it can look like a car, but you can't drive it. Everything has to have parameters And based upon your previously stated "logic" the point at which it becomes a car is when it is outside the factory walls. Until then, regardless of whether it has been fully assembled or not, it remains a WIP which should NEVER under any circumstance be called a "car," scientifically speaking, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted June 7, 2019 Share Posted June 7, 2019 8 hours ago, BullBuchanan said: Lotta white men in here with a lot of strong opinions on women's rights. Opened this thread and wasn't disappointed. How DARE you assume our gender identities! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted June 8, 2019 Share Posted June 8, 2019 On June 5, 2019 at 5:54 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: This has bothered me all day and honestly I don't think I'll forget it any time soon. It's incomprehensible and I wish I could go back in time and never click it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 8, 2019 Share Posted June 8, 2019 On 6/5/2019 at 5:54 PM, TakeYouToTasker said: That's just f*cking disturbing And the people who get a chuckle out of this crap probably think deer hunting is inhumane and barbaric 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted June 8, 2019 Share Posted June 8, 2019 43 minutes ago, /dev/null said: That's just f*cking disturbing And the people who get a chuckle out of this crap probably think deer hunting is inhumane and barbaric I am really bothered by it and I cannot believe a person could do something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 8, 2019 Share Posted June 8, 2019 WAPO: YOU’LL NEVER GUESS WHICH PARTY IS ON THE DEFENSIVE OVER ABORTION. One party certainly deserves to be on the defensive over their rush to the extreme on abortion, especially this week. Give the Washington Post credit for pointing it out this morning. After hectoring Joe Biden into a series of reversals over the broadly popular prohibition on federal funding of abortions, the Democratic Party has become hostile to any pro-life candidate and voter. Now they are facing a potential revolt in states that Democrats need to defeat Donald Trump, Paul Kane reports[.] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted June 8, 2019 Share Posted June 8, 2019 On 6/7/2019 at 10:14 AM, BullBuchanan said: Lotta white men in here with a lot of strong opinions on women's rights. Opened this thread and wasn't disappointed. If health care isn’t a right, neither is abortion. Consistency is actually easy when you have a brain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 9, 2019 Share Posted June 9, 2019 Democrats on the defensive as abortion foes ask if party tolerates their views Washington Post, by Paul Kane Original Article Just two years ago then-House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) deflected questions about ideological litmus tests on abortion rights, suggesting Democrats offered a big tent welcoming people of all creeds. “I grew up Nancy D’Alesandro, in Baltimore, Maryland; in Little Italy; in a very devout Catholic family,” Pelosi, who is now House speaker, told The Washington Post in May 2017. Her politically powerful family included many opponents of abortion through their religious beliefs, she said. “Most of those people — my family, extended family — are not pro-choice. You think I’m kicking them out of the Democratic Party?” You have no choice now Nancy, the Radical Left viewpoint is all that will be permitted.........................just ask Joe. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Big Abortion’s Biggest Lie by David Catron Original Article MORE CENSORSHIP: Pinterest permanently BANNED the pro-life group Live Action . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 On 6/7/2019 at 2:46 PM, B-Man said: Politicians and lobbyists within that 16% routinely call the 75% "extreme." As do some 'posters' here. The remaining 9% believe it starts when a person realizes Democrats are full of *****. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 16 minutes ago, DC Tom said: The remaining 9% believe it starts when a person realizes Democrats are full of *****. they are but it can be very useful to be in that Party for personal gain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 "If you disagree with ripping babies apart in the womb then you have to also disagree with enforcing our immigration laws" is just a really, really, really stupid argument and you should be extremely embarrassed if you're one of the countless leftists who have used it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted June 15, 2019 Share Posted June 15, 2019 https://news.yahoo.com/taxpayer-funded-abortion-let-guns-103012664.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 16, 2019 Share Posted June 16, 2019 (edited) NARAL is wishing “all the pro-choice dads” Happy Father’s Day because nothing says fatherhood quite like aborting children. Corrected: . Edited June 16, 2019 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 18, 2019 Share Posted June 18, 2019 As we told you on Friday, Rep. Will Hurd (R-Texas) was removed from speaking at the Black Hat Conference, a gathering of cybersecurity experts, because he has dared to vote for protecting life. Hurd is a former CIA officer who knows about cybersecurity. Another Texas Rep., Dan Crenshaw, says preventing qualified people from providing insight on matters on national security because of political positions they have taken is a dangerous precedent to set. These kinds of decisions can lead to a lot of unintended consequences. Kirsten Gillibrand promises federal money for abortions no matter what state you live in 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 I didn't know where to put this... 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 19, 2019 Share Posted June 19, 2019 17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said: I didn't know where to put this... Thus depriving Planned Parenthood of their livelihood. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 On 6/19/2019 at 11:30 AM, Deranged Rhino said: I didn't know where to put this... 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted June 20, 2019 Share Posted June 20, 2019 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 https://www.dailywire.com/news/48716/british-female-judge-orders-young-woman-have-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro This kind of thing could never happen in the enlightened and civilized west, could it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 21, 2019 Share Posted June 21, 2019 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Smug vandal rips out pro-life crosses, compares pro-lifers to flat-Earthers. On 6/21/2019 at 3:43 PM, Joe in Winslow said: https://www.dailywire.com/news/48716/british-female-judge-orders-young-woman-have-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=benshapiro This kind of thing could never happen in the enlightened and civilized west, could it? So much for autonomous control of her own body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 7 minutes ago, B-Man said: So much for autonomous control of her own body. She's a ward of the state, deemed incapable of making her own decisions. Her mother isn't her legal guardian, and her doctors have no authority outside expressing their medical judgement. Really, this was so clear-cut, it shouldn't have even gone to court. The State's authority supersedes everyone else's. This, by they way...state authority exercised for the health of the community? Fascism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 14 minutes ago, DC Tom said: She's a ward of the state, deemed incapable of making her own decisions. Her mother isn't her legal guardian, and her doctors have no authority outside expressing their medical judgement. Really, this was so clear-cut, it shouldn't have even gone to court. The State's authority supersedes everyone else's. This, by they way...state authority exercised for the health of the community? Fascism. decisions have to made, and quickly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatdrought Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 2 hours ago, DC Tom said: She's a ward of the state, deemed incapable of making her own decisions. Her mother isn't her legal guardian, and her doctors have no authority outside expressing their medical judgement. Really, this was so clear-cut, it shouldn't have even gone to court. The State's authority supersedes everyone else's. This, by they way...state authority exercised for the health of the community? Fascism. I thought you were defending this for a minute. Had me worried... So much for a womans body and her choice. This will be in America before we know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 U.K. Court of Appeal Overturns Ruling Ordering Mentally Disabled ... https://www.wsj.com › World › Europe › U.K. BREAKING NEWS: Appeals Court Overturns Judge’s Ruling Forcing Mentally Disabled Woman to Have Abortion Doctors argued that the abortion is in the woman’s best interests — even though social workers and her own family disagree. Her legal team argued there is no evidence to show that aborting her baby is beneficial for her. The woman’s mother has even offered to care for the grandchild but the judge ruled otherwise. Mrs Justice Lieven wrote in her ruling: “I think she would like to have a baby in the same way she would like to have a nice doll.” But the woman’s mother is appealing the ruling. The woman’s mother, who is a member of the Nigerian Igbo community and a Catholic, is fighting the decision. She says abortion is against her Catholic religious beliefs and her cultural beliefs. She also said that she would be able to care for the baby, and that her daughter’s abilities and wishes were being undermined. Doctors must not abort mentally-ill woman's baby, appeal judges rule Mon 24 Jun 2019 By Press Association A judge on Friday concluded that a pregnancy termination was in the woman's best interests. Mrs Justice Lieven had analysed evidence at a hearing in the Court of Protection, where issues relating to people who lack the mental capacity to make decisions are considered, in London. But three appeal judges on Monday over-ruled that decision after the woman's mother, a former midwife, mounted a challenge. Lord Justice McCombe, Lady Justice King and Lord Justice Peter Jackson had considered the challenge at a Court of Appeal hearing in London. They said they would give reasons for their decision at a later date. https://www.premier.org.uk/News/UK/Doctors-must-not-abort-mentally-ill-woman-s-baby-appeal-judges-rule?utm_source=SPUC+News+List&utm_campaign=5c8aece232-ask+MP+to+contact+Sajid+Javid_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_826f492851-5c8aece232-138710545&mc_cid=5c8aece232&mc_eid=8acb74a2ca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 24, 2019 Share Posted June 24, 2019 Judge keeps Missouri’s Planned Parenthood open, but abortionists won’t perform ‘unethical’ pelvic exam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 Hit the arrow..................This is a human being. We all know it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 28, 2019 Share Posted June 28, 2019 On 6/24/2019 at 7:20 PM, B-Man said: Judge keeps Missouri’s Planned Parenthood open, but abortionists won’t perform ‘unethical’ pelvic exam it's a dirty lowdown scummy thing to be dealing in killing people.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 6, 2019 Share Posted July 6, 2019 Just a quick (LIBERAL) reminder.......................no other opinions are allowed “Unplanned,” the movie about one of the youngest Planned Parenthood directors in the United States who resigned and became a pro-life activist after being asked to assist in an abortion at thirteen weeks’ gestation, was released in March (and was quickly labeled “Drama/Propaganda” by Google). Now the movie is set to open in 24 Canadian theaters, so outrage by the pro-abortion crowd is ginning up again, but this time maple syrup-flavored. Quote Rebecca@RebeccaO1340 Time to boycott Cineplex and Landmark theaters! I will not be going to any chains that show anti choice propaganda in any of their theaters. Controversial anti-abortion film Unplanned to hit more than 24 Canadian theatres h ttps://www.thestar.com/entertainment/movies/2019/07/03/controversial-anti-abortion-film-unplanned-to-hit-more-than-24-canadian-theatres.html … via @torontostar 7:07 PM - Jul 4, 2019 Note The Toronto Star’s helpful reporting that critics panned it (shocker!) and many called it propaganda. Note also the obligatory “controversial” label attached — one that would never be reflexively applied to a pro-choice film. The Star reports: But the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada calls it “a dangerous piece of anti-abortion propaganda” containing “vicious falsehoods.” “It preaches an absolutist and extreme case against abortion that has nothing to do with reality,” the ARCC said in a statement. “Because of the film’s demonization of abortion providers, ARCC fears the movie could incite fanatics to commit acts of harassment or violence against clinics or doctors.” First, we’d be willing to bet no one at the ARCC has actually seen it, and second, at least one theater in Alberta will have security on hand after it “had a lot of threats” over screening the film. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 CHANGE: Boosted by Trump Judges, 9th Circuit Gives Pro-Lifers a Win. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koko78 Posted July 16, 2019 Share Posted July 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said: 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 They kicked her out because Wen, a certified MD wouldn't say trans can't have abortions... Holy God... The Left/dems/progressives 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hedge Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 In this letter below, she states it's due to PP pushing advocacy to the front as it's main mission, not healthcare. This would seem to jive with her reported refusal to go full-Leftist in her statements. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 17, 2019 Share Posted July 17, 2019 Quote Stephen MillerVerified account @redsteeze FollowFollow @redsteeze You know this is about women’s healthcare when they fired one of the most well known medical experts in women’s healthcare in the country because she wouldn’t along with woke redefining of medical biology. 5:04 PM - 16 Jul 2019 . "The new Board leadership has determined that the priority of Planned Parenthood moving forward will be to double down on abortion advocacy." So your mammogram lie....................was just that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted July 18, 2019 Share Posted July 18, 2019 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts