Jump to content

Charles Clay- the most useless player ever


NewEra

Recommended Posts

Just now, dave mcbride said:

Lol. The ball most decidedly did not get there. It freaking did not even reach the goal line. You are about to enter my pet peeve of always-blame-the-receiver fans!

Hi I’m dave mcbride.

 

My eyes don’t work and I don’t understand football.

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

(Nothing peeves me more than fans bringing out the pitchforks for receivers who don’t mke citcus catches on bad throws.)

 

Except that Clay has a long history of not catching well thrown balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

Lol. The ball most decidedly did not get there. It freaking did not even reach the goal line. You are about to enter my pet peeve of always-blame-the-receiver fans!

Watch the play a bunch of times. He throws it about 60 yards in the air. He's on the 40, still running and throws it to the goalline across his body on the opposite hash mark. And again, Clay can see it all the way. He DOESNT dive for the ball, he stumbles with no one near him. He's running back for the ball well before it gets there and he tackles himself but STILL GETS TWO HANDS on it. He has to make that catch. He admitted he stumbled and admitted he should have caught it. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Lol. The ball most decidedly did not get there. It freaking did not even reach the goal line. You are about to enter my pet peeve of always-blame-the-receiver fans!

You ever try launching a 35 yard pass across your body to the opposite side of the field after running for you like for 5 seconds in circles?

 

More often than not this is the way it comes out.

 

The incomplete pass was indeed partially due to this (you are right there)

Clay still had a good chance to catch it and probably should have.

 

There is no single point of blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Lol. The ball most decidedly did not get there. It freaking did not even reach the goal line. You are about to enter my pet peeve of always-blame-the-receiver fans!

 

Are you saying that Clay didn't trip over his feet or stumble on his come back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

Watch the play a bunch of times. He throws it about 60 yards in the air. He's on the 40, still running and throws it to the goalline across his body on the opposite hash mark. And again, Clay can see it all the way. He DOESNT dive for the ball, he stumbles with no one near him. He's running back for the ball well before it gets there and he tackles himself but STILL GETS TWO HANDS on it. He has to make that catch. He admitted he stumbled and admitted he should have caught it. 

Kelly, he throws it 40yds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Lol. The ball most decidedly did not get there. It freaking did not even reach the goal line. You are about to enter my pet peeve of always-blame-the-receiver fans!

 

It hit him in the hands.

 

Th Bills didn't need to score on the play. The goal line statement is irrelevant noise to the conversation. They needed to convert on 4th and 11, and a pass thown under duress on 4th and 11 hit a guy in his hands. Professionals make that catch, period.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Kelly the Dog said:

Watch the play a bunch of times. He throws it about 60 yards in the air. He's on the 40, still running and throws it to the goalline across his body on the opposite hash mark. And again, Clay can see it all the way. He DOESNT dive for the ball, he stumbles with no one near him. He's running back for the ball well before it gets there and he tackles himself but STILL GETS TWO HANDS on it. He has to make that catch. He admitted he stumbled and admitted he should have caught it. 

You are wedded to your interpretation. I liked allen’s play for the most part on that play (as I explicitly stated earlier). But it was a crap throw. It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stony said:

Kelly, he throws it 40yds. 

He threw it from the 40, between the hash and the sideline, ACROSS the field which is 35 yards. If he threw it straight, on the left side of the field, it would have been 40 yards. It goes to the other hash mark on the other side of the field. It's at least 55 yards in the air.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clay could have made a great catch there but Allen could also have set his feet and thrown it to him instead of under throwing it by 10 yards. He has plenty of arm to make a good throw there. And the OTs could have blocked somebody too so that Allen wasn't scrambling for his life. It's never just one player.

Edited by vincec
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RocCityRoller said:

 

It hit him in the hands.

 

Th Bills didn't need to score on the play. The goal line statement is irrelevant noise to the conversation. They needed to convert on 4th and 11, and a pass thown under duress on 4th and 11 hit a guy in his hands. Professionals make that catch, period.

 

 

Ah, my favorite blame-the-receiver line: “it hit him in the hands.” It was a bad throw (after a great scramble and great decision) that would have been a bona fide circus catch if caught. And are fans here completely blind to the fact that players on both sides were slipping and sliding all day on that surface??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, CodeMonkey said:

It was a ***** wounded duck pass, but yeah a NFL player needs to make the catch.

Charles Fn Clay has been doing exactly nothing, while making 9 mill a year for the last several seasons.  That’s what this post is about.  If you dispute this claim, watch more Bills game.  Not sure what to say.  

 

His attempt at the wounded duck pass from out rookie QB was embarrassing.  His effort was laughable.  

Edited by NewEra
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kelly the Dog said:

He threw it from the 40, between the hash and the sideline, ACROSS the field which is 35 yards. If he threw it straight, on the left side of the field, it would have been 40 yards. It goes to the other hash mark on the other side of the field. It's at least 55 yards in the air.

Gotcha, I thought you mixed up the sides of the field!

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dave mcbride said:

Ah, my favorite blame-the-receiver line: “it hit him in the hands.” It was a bad throw (after a great scramble and great decision) that would have been a bona fide circus catch if caught. And are fans here completely blind to the fact that players on both sides were slipping and sliding all day on that surface??

 

Yep - and the Sabres were having trouble keeping their edges in Tampa Bay and Miami this past weekend - humidity is a thing - Florida being the worst state in the Union is also a thing...

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GG said:

 

Are you saying that Clay didn't trip over his feet or stumble on his come back?

See previois comments by me about the field surface today — players were falling down all game. Regardless. It was short by 6-7 yards and required a circus catch because it demanded a reverse in direction.

 

I remember you blaming watkins for taylor’s int v NE despite that he leaped as high as he could and his fingertips grazed the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Ah, my favorite blame-the-receiver line: “it hit him in the hands.” It was a bad throw (after a great scramble and great decision) that would have been a bona fide circus catch if caught. And are fans here completely blind to the fact that players on both sides were slipping and sliding all day on that surface??

 

Go and watch the play again

 

not even a one in a million excuse for a pro to not make that catch

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:

Ah, my favorite blame-the-receiver line: “it hit him in the hands.” It was a bad throw (after a great scramble and great decision) that would have been a bona fide circus catch if caught. And are fans here completely blind to the fact that players on both sides were slipping and sliding all day on that surface??

 

Clay himself admitted he should have caught the ball. Keep fighting the good fight though.

 

And let me know what the channel was of the game you watched.

 

It clearly wasn't what everyone else, including the players, were watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...