Jump to content
bdutton

Occasi-Cortez Channeling the Rent's too damn high guy

Recommended Posts

What happened, exactly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, GG said:

What happened, exactly?

 

Not sure, but I'm certain it will involve allegations of Republicans pouncing on poor innocent Nasty Nancy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, GG said:

What happened, exactly?


Nancy wanted Trump condemned for tweets that mentioned no one, and no race, and got booed. Doug Collins wants her words stricken from the record. She left, then the guy who was chairing left in a huff. 


Just mentioned a Speakers words have not been taken down since 1984.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, GG said:

What happened, exactly?

 

I'll pull a clip when I get a chance but basically: 

 

Pelosi gave a statement and personally attacked the President -- which is a violation of parliamentary procedure. 

Doug Collins objected, asked her to amend her statement -- Pelosi refused saying she had it vetted before she read it and it was deemed proper.

Collins then moved to take down her words -- which I don't know enough about procedure to say what that means/requires.

So then everyone broke off to figure out what to do, because they have to hold a vote on whether or not to remove her words... 

The chair (who I don't know, a dem) then got on the mic and said everyone wants to just fight and escalate, he said Nancy's words were fair but they (the GOP) are trying to escalate it by pulling a stunt. He then called Nancy a friend and said he abandons his chair and dropped the gavel. 

The chair was Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks! (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I'll pull a clip when I get a chance but basically: 

 

Pelosi gave a statement and personally attacked the President -- which is a violation of parliamentary procedure. 

Doug Collins objected, asked her to amend her statement -- Pelosi refused saying she had it vetted before she read it and it was deemed proper.

Collins then moved to take down her words -- which I don't know enough about procedure to say what that means/requires.

So then everyone broke off to figure out what to do, because they have to hold a vote on whether or not to remove her words... 

The chair (who I don't know, a dem) then got on the mic and said everyone wants to just fight and escalate, he said Nancy's words were fair but they (the GOP) are trying to escalate it by pulling a stunt. He then called Nancy a friend and said he abandons his chair and dropped the gavel. 

The chair was Emanuel Cleaver of Missouri. 

They're all so hung up in their own self importance that it's scary.

Edited by 4merper4mer
  • Like (+1) 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Buftex said:

I guess being called a Nazi triggers you the same way the President of the United States telling citizens of the United States to "go back where you came from" triggers some people. Buncha over-sensitive pansys.

 

 

Nothing that comes out of your  piehole triggers me because whenever I read your online version of anal leakage I just have to remind myself that Hillary Clinton is still not president.

 

I just have to remind myself about Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

 

I just have to remind myself that today the Senate will approve Trump's 63rd circuit court judge.

 

Then I say again, "Hillary lost to  Trump," and sleep like an effin' baby. :lol:

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 1
  • Awesome! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, GG said:

What happened, exactly?

  Pelosi filled her Depends and it is a three man job to change them.

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

During the hearing an interesting point was made... 

 

Nowhere in Trump's tweet did he name the "squad" -- yet everyone knew who he was talking about when he called them out for their language and anti-American rhetoric. Then, to remove all doubt, the four women called a press conference to confirm they are indeed those ladies. 

 

:lol: 


Replaying the clip now, Sean Duffy (R, Wi)

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is hilarious 

 

 so much for impeachment proceedings now

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, IDBillzFan said:

 

Nothing that comes out of your  piehole triggers me because whenever I read your online version of anal leakage I just have to remind myself that Hillary Clinton is still not president.

 

I just have to remind myself about Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

 

I just have to remind myself that today the Senate will approve Trump's 63rd circuit court judge.

 

Then I say again, "Hillary lost to  Trump," and sleep like an effin' baby. :lol:

 

 

 

You are precious... 

Edited by Buftex

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Saw the same (but forget where this morning, sure it's out there). If I remember right it was polling from swing states.

 

They're about to rule now... (on CSPAN)

 

And the chair just abandoned his chair after throwing a hissy fit.

Sure you're not confusing that poll with the poll of 1000 independents without a college degree? Supposedly swing voters.

  • Haha (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Just now, 3rdnlng said:

Sure you're not confusing that poll with the poll of 1000 independents without a college degree? Supposedly swing voters.

 

Could be -- I read it in passing this morning and didn't think enough about it to look too deeply.

  • Like (+1) 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, 3rdnlng said:

Sure you're not confusing that poll with the poll of 1000 independents without a college degree? Supposedly swing voters.

  Swing voters that live in "the village?" (Liberal stronghold)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

Could be -- I read it in passing this morning and didn't think enough about it to look too deeply.

Didn't Trump base his entire 2016 campaign on how ***** America was?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, RochesterRob said:

  Pelosi filled her Depends and it is a three man job to change them.

 

Hey, say what you want about Pelosi, but at least she can peel a potato and step off a curb without Secret Service crutches at her side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

They left (imo) because they knew they couldn't get out of it.

 

About to rule now...And ruled against Pelosi.

  • Thanks! (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chair ruled... she was not in order, and the words should not be used. 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thanks! (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Now looking at yays and nays... 

Now the vote for 15 minutes

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, row_33 said:

This is hilarious 

 

 so much for impeachment proceedings now

They are having an argument over the process to determine which group is a bigger bunch of jerky-jerks.  Somehow the group of lesser jerky-jerks perceives they will gain a political advantage.

 

Meanwhile, in the real world, actual things happen while they argue over which strongly worded letter should be sent to whom.

 

None of this charade has a basis in anyone giving a crap about the actual content of a tweet or the rhetoric from the other side that preceded it.  It's all about them and their own maneuvering for power as usual.

 

They can get bent.

Edited by 4merper4mer
  • Like (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Nancy wanted Trump condemned for tweets that mentioned no one, and no race, and got booed. Doug Collins wants her words stricken from the record. She left, then the guy who was chairing left in a huff. 


Just mentioned a Speakers words have not been taken down since 1984.

they should be recorded and should have always been recorded. what are they afraid of, being held to task?

disingenuous *****.

  • Like (+1) 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Boy oh boy, was Nancy trying to make lemonade out of this Democratic debacle? Or should she have gone with the first rule of holes? 

  • Like (+1) 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Buftex said:

Didn't Trump base his entire 2016 campaign on how ***** America was?

 

 

Not America. 

 

The government.

(establishment)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


Boy oh boy, was Nancy trying to make lemonade out of this Democratic debacle? Or should she have gone with the first rule of holes? 

when you see one, jump!?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...