Jump to content

Patrick Mahomes Lighting up the Chargers


26CornerBlitz

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Straight Hucklebuck said:

Doug Whaley watched college tape and concluded that EJ Manuel was worth a first rounder, whereas Dashaun Watson and Patrick Mahomes were not worth a first round pick. 

 

And our new GM traded Glenn, #12, #53, #56 for a project from the Mountain West

 

You can’t make this stuff up. 

 

The common denominator? Both GMs talked about arm strength, size, and “presence” while saying nothing about how the quarterback accurately threw a football. 

 

There were reports that Whaley liked Watson that year. Whose to say he wouldn’t have drafted him if he was in charge. McDermott ran the draft and made the picks that year.

 

https://www.newyorkupstate.com/buffalo-bills/index.ssf/2017/04/buffalo_bills_gm_doug_whaley_in_love_with_clemson_qb_deshaun_watson_report.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I was the Bills GM Mahomes would be our QB...

 

The proof is right here at TBD...I would have taken him #1 overall...

 

One good performance does not make me right...But...I loved that kid coming out...

 

And the year before I would have taken Chris Jones where we took Lawson...

 

I think, at the very least, maybe I can get a job Scouting for KC...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, jrober38 said:

 

6 of 15 with 3 sacks disagrees. 

Had a couple drops and admittedly a bad throw or two.  He will be OK he just needs some time IMHO. He is better than Peterman in real games that's for damn sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, matter2003 said:

Had a couple drops and admittedly a bad throw or two.  He will be OK he just needs some time IMHO. He is better than Peterman in real games that's for damn sure.

 

None of us know if he'll be okay. Historically speaking, he probably isn't going to be any good when you consider that over 50% of all 1st rounders bust. 

 

I worry for his development. He's going to have to start up to 15 games for arguably the worst team in the NFL and I don't think that will do anything to aid his development. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jrober38 said:

 

None of us know if he'll be okay. Historically speaking, he probably isn't going to be any good when you consider that over 50% of all 1st rounders bust. 

 

I worry for his development. He's going to have to start up to 15 games for arguably the worst team in the NFL and I don't think that will do anything to aid his development. 

Good players will become good no matter how bad the team is...look at Peyton Mannings first year in Indy..they were terrible but he turned out OK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, matter2003 said:

Good players will become good no matter how bad the team is...look at Peyton Mannings first year in Indy..they were terrible but he turned out OK

 

There is zero evidence that suggests Josh Allen is a good NFL player.

 

He wasn't even a good college football player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, matter2003 said:

Good players will become good no matter how bad the team is...look at Peyton Mannings first year in Indy..they were terrible but he turned out OK

image.jpeg.580e922bcd4e9364eb94d37bcb20c7f3.jpeg
Aikman finished 1989 with a 0–11 record as a starter, completing 155 of 293 passes for 1,749 yards, 9 touchdowns and 18 interceptions. Following Aikman's rookie season, Dallas selected Florida Gators RB Emmitt Smith in the first round of the 1990 NFL Draft.

His career ended up ok. 
Just now, jrober38 said:

 

There is zero evidence that suggests Josh Allen is a good NFL player.

 

He wasn't even a good college football player. 

 

So then why are you concerned about his development. If he sucks, he sucks and we move on.  It won't be because he played with a bad team. 

Edited by PlayoffsPlease
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BADOLBILZ said:

 

 

The big problem with kicking the young QB decision down the road in 2017 was the urgency it created to trade players and get capital for the 2018 draft.

 

They gutted this roster and have put the young QB in a perilous situation.

 

 

 

 

Or they have just accepted the fact that the OL is going to be putrid this year and are going to address it next year.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

Or they have just accepted the fact that the OL is going to be putrid this year and are going to address it next year.

 

O-line.......wide receivers.......defense to help keep scores close enough to allow for defensive balance........it's not just the OL.

 

Here's the deal John.......they are going to have the opportunity to get early, if not FIRST cracks at in-season waiver claims and have lot's of job opportunities to offer other teams stashed practice squad players........and they NEED to parlay that into some talent BEFORE next year.

 

I've said it before but these personnel people the team hired were spoken of in hushed tones because they were supposedly so great and Pegula's were paying thru the nose for them..........they need to be mining some gems and so far the gem haul has been pretty non-existent(especially on the OL) and this veteran free agent class they brought in?   Wow.

Edited by BADOLBILZ
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NoSaint said:

 

I won’t argue I’m a big mahomes guy. But I’ll loop these arguments around to a few concerns:

 

1) are you confident in a system that would allow burning an off-season because they can’t evaluate an nfl qb with a ton of film?

 

2) are you confident we can do that with a college qb if we couldn’t with Taylor?

 

3) If you don’t think we could develop mahomes, do you think allen is an easier project?

 

4) does it worry you that we didn’t get a group of coaches that seems to inspire confidence in you regarding qb evaluation/development?

 

again, not arguing I love mahomes. I honestly don’t know him that well, but some of the justifications in the thread seem to actually raise much larger red flags instead of putting minds at ease.

Okay, #1, this is a brand new head coach to the NFL and like so many other new NFL head coaches he doesn't know what he doesn't know. So a lot is a learn as you go process. 

 

I can also presuppose that the head coach didn't care to pull the trigger on drafting a QB in 2017 with an early pick when the team had so many other needs. The team did hit a home run with #1 pick in CB Tre White and OT #2, Dion Dawkins. On his own, McD did have the right idea that the team needed a new RT and because of an injury to Glenn that RT went to LT and played admirably. 

 

Then when Beane came in and looked over the books they then had to make some tough choices as the team is in dead cap space of 55 million dollars due to Glenn, Dareus among others. NFN, although Glenn played decently with Incognito next to him he wasn't a consistent pro bowl LT worth 12 mill per in my view. So I can see why the team traded him. I can also see why they dumped Dareus, Watkins, and others. Next year the team should have much more cap space available to sign players. 

 

So far I really like what McD/Beane have done so far, save not doing a better job of upgrading that offensive line.

 

#2, I can see why this new coaching staff would want to evaluate a QB in their own scheme because it's difficult to evaluate a QB when you don't know the plays being called and the options the QB has on each play regardless of how much film you watch. So this new coaching staff gave the man an honest shot to earn the job full time and he failed.    

 

The plan this year was to start/play Peterman in a quick strike, a pass-first offense that would help neutralize the pass rush and allow for a much more wide open passing scheme. 

 

That plan went into the toilet by the 3rd quarter in the Ravens game as Peterman was pulled and Allen went in. Going forward I hope to god that the new Bills OC sees the error of his ways and goes back to a run-first offensive scheme to run the ball to set up the pass and allow Allen a chance to develop.   

 

#3, Allen came from a pro-style offensive scheme at Wyoming in which he didn't have many short dump off throws, bubble screens which can pad stats like some of those other early QB picks. So most of Allen's throws were deep pro-style throws. He also played in the snow and cold in Wyoming so the weather in Buffalo won't be a factor. To me, Allen looks like the prototypical perfect fit QB for the Buffalo Bills. He should be an easier project to develop over a constant shotgun spread offense QB as in my view as most of those don't work out in the NFL.   

 

#4, New Bills OC Brian Daboll came in with a history of working in NE with Tom Brady, Bill Belichick, working at Alabama with Nick Saban.  I can already tell you that his first attempt at play calling, offensive scheme setup failed in that Ravens game. I can also say I really dislike the Bills run game coordinator/O line coach in Juan Castillo. The passing game with Peterman stunk and the run game stunk as McCoy wasn't getting much space to work with.  

 

Bottom line:  From what I see this team needs to return to what worked for them in the past few years with being a run-first team so they can run to set up the pass. This way it should help develop Josh Allen properly and he might survive the season. Otherwise, fire those two jamokes (Daboll, Castillio) and hire ex-Lions HC Jim Caldwell to run the offense.                                 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did anyone that has commented on this actually watch any of the highlights?!?! Go back and watch the clips from all four of Mahomes TD’s and let’s hear how we blew it by passing on him. Two touchdowns were little shovel passes inside the five. One a slant to Hill who took it to the house with his world class speed, and the other being a wheel route to his FB. Yes, 4 touchdowns look impressive on paper, but he completed 15 passes. I am not saying he won’t be good, but whoever is complaining, didn’t watch the highlights and are strictly commenting based on the stat line. 

  • Thank you (+1) 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mjohns85 said:

Did anyone that has commented on this actually watch any of the highlights?!?! Go back and watch the clips from all four of Mahomes TD’s and let’s hear how we blew it by passing on him. Two touchdowns were little shovel passes inside the five. One a slant to Hill who took it to the house with his world class speed, and the other being a wheel route to his FB. Yes, 4 touchdowns look impressive on paper, but he completed 15 passes. I am not saying he won’t be good, but whoever is complaining, didn’t watch the highlights and are strictly commenting based on the stat line. 

One game doesn't define a career either. 

 

Look at Ryan Fitzpatrick today 21 of 28 for 414 yards, 4 Tds ...49 fan points.

 

Mahomes went 15 of 27 for 256 yards, 4 TDs...36 fan points.

 

This was his first game this year and defenses adjust, so let's see what he looks like down the road a bit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mjohns85 said:

Did anyone that has commented on this actually watch any of the highlights?!?! Go back and watch the clips from all four of Mahomes TD’s and let’s hear how we blew it by passing on him. Two touchdowns were little shovel passes inside the five. One a slant to Hill who took it to the house with h pastis world class speed, and the other being a wheel route to his FB. Yes, 4 touchdowns look impressive on paper, but he completed 15 passes. I am not saying he won’t be good, but whoever is complaining, didn’t watch the highlights and are strictly commenting based on the stat line. 

Exactly!  I noted earlier(jokingly) that he only completed 56% of his passes today.  He made some plays obviously but can we hold off the HOF balloting for a bit?  The guy plays in an Andy Reid offense.   KC flys outta the gates but we all know how they finish.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...