Jump to content

LeSean McCoy Sued by Ex-Girlfriend Delicia Cordon - Now Making Accusations of Being Physically Abused


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Wayne Arnold said:

 

If by “be careful” you mean “not rape” then yes.

 

 

And be sure to keep a detailed calendar so you can show all your Senate questioners that there are no entries on an day for "rape someone"..

  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2018 at 3:25 PM, Royale with Cheese said:

Yep.

Can't get him on a crime so I'm just going to take his money.

 

I could be missing something, but has she filed a new lawsuit or something, or is this just new stuff in the current lawsuit?

 

Because the lawsuit she filed essentially charges McCoy with breaching his duty to her as a landlord by not providing her with adequate security.

Normally a landlord is not responsible for criminal activity unless it’s somehow held to be predictable and the landlord didn’t take steps.

 

The thing is, Shady could beat his poor dog like a drum, abuse his son, promise to buy her a house, beat her, and still not be responsible for breaching his duty to her as a landlord.

Unless she can prove (and not just allege) that Shady was somehow responsible for the crime itself or that he should have been able to predict the crime would occur and failed to take reasonable landlord precautions like locks and lighting.

 

Of course, if there’s a new lawsuit, the above may not apply.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 10/4/2018 at 9:02 AM, Mr. WEO said:

It wasn't for lack of trying though. 

 

No way to know.  She has no credibility much less witnesses.

 

2 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said:

 

 

LOL!  They'll be lucky to get $13.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

No way to know.  She has no credibility much less witnesses.

 

 

 

 

No credibility?  Even the President of the United States, after hearing her testimony, said she was "a very credible witness".

 

No witnesses?  Other Than Judge, you mean?  Yeah, none.  Wait, Judge "doesn't recall" the episode in question?  Shocking for a guy who was an alcoholic as a teen.

 

Judge, in his book lays waste all of the denials by Kavanaugh (or, should we say "Brent O'Kavanaugh"? lol) about the drinking to blackouts, the way they viewed and treated women in high school.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. WEO said:

No credibility?  Even the President of the United States, after hearing her testimony, said she was "a very credible witness".

 

No witnesses?  Other Than Judge, you mean?  Yeah, none.  Wait, Judge "doesn't recall" the episode in question?  Shocking for a guy who was an alcoholic as a teen.

 

Judge, in his book lays waste all of the denials by Kavanaugh (or, should we say "Brent O'Kavanaugh"? lol) about the drinking to blackouts, the way they viewed and treated women in high school. 

 

I don't really care what Trump (or anyone else for that matter) said.  She scrubbed her social media of all her Anti-Trump material, changed the details of her story many times, couldn't even remember events from a couple months ago much less much of anything from the night in question, and even her own friend who she said was there said she had never attended a party where both Ford and Kavanaugh were present.  IOW, like I said, no credibility or witnesses. 

 

As for Judge, you're right, he's an alcoholic.  If that's the best witness you've got...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

No credibility?  Even the President of the United States, after hearing her testimony, said she was "a very credible witness".

 

No witnesses?  Other Than Judge, you mean?  Yeah, none.  Wait, Judge "doesn't recall" the episode in question?  Shocking for a guy who was an alcoholic as a teen.

 

Judge, in his book lays waste all of the denials by Kavanaugh (or, should we say "Brent O'Kavanaugh"? lol) about the drinking to blackouts, the way they viewed and treated women in high school.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I'm not a Trump supporter by any means, but would you take his judgment as a valid point in anything other than a situation like this? 

 

Where it supports your position? I mean, I'd venture you'd take him as a someone with questionable character himself and a bad judge of character given the people he has surrounded himself at times.

 

Yet in this instance, he had a moment of clarity? I think both you and Doc, make good points at times and are pretty intelligent people with just differing view points.

 

Watching this go back and forth I just see no point in it. You're cherry picking stuff and he is aswell. 

 

In my opinion he called her a credible witness to try to back track from the disaster of a press conference he called after the UN General Assembly. He rambled on about his past experiences, how false accusations happen so frequently, and ended it with warning teenage boys to be careful of false accusations.

 

That statement was all him trying to back track from the day before when he was unhinged for an hour and a half with the world witnessing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

I'm not a Trump supporter by any means, but would you take his judgment as a valid point in anything other than a situation like this? 

 

Where it supports your position? I mean, I'd venture you'd take him as a someone with questionable character himself and a bad judge of character given the people he has surrounded himself at times.

 

Yet in this instance, he had a moment of clarity? I think both you and Doc, make good points at times and are pretty intelligent people with just differing view points.

 

Watching this go back and forth I just see no point in it. You're cherry picking stuff and he is aswell. 

 

In my opinion he called her a credible witness to try to back track from the disaster of a press conference he called after the UN General Assembly. He rambled on about his past experiences, how false accusations happen so frequently, and ended it with warning teenage boys to be careful of false accusations.

 

That statement was all him trying to back track from the day before when he was unhinged for an hour and a half with the world witnessing it.

 

 

Trumos a moron.  But he agreed with everyone (because he was told to) on both sides of the aisle immediately after Ford's testimony who felt she was credible.

 

So, he wasn't alone.  Kavanaugh's problem was that, by lying about the little stuff (he was obviously a rich private school party bro who drank to excess), he can't be trusted with the bigger truths (or lies).   He made a fool of himself over stupid things.  And all that F-ing crying right out of the gate.  WTF was that??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

Trumos a moron.  But he agreed with everyone (because he was told to) on both sides of the aisle immediately after Ford's testimony who felt she was credible.

 

So, he wasn't alone.  Kavanaugh's problem was that, by lying about the little stuff (he was obviously a rich private school party bro who drank to excess), he can't be trusted with the bigger truths (or lies).   He made a fool of himself over stupid things.  And all that F-ing crying right out of the gate.  WTF was that??

 

I'm not sure, I don't really think he has a good temperament for a judge. Yet surprisingly most judges don't, however, they usually don't make it to the Supreme Court.

 

I don't really want to hijack the thread. I think the whole thing was a mess. I think she had her own credibility issues as well. 

 

Now she had her issues and felt she owed society this? She was trying to project herself as a martyr. She said she was forced to drink grain alcohol, but remembered a lot of details and knew what happened. Then, she also claims she witnessed it happening to others. Knowing her pain, wouldn't you feel obligated at that point to say something? She let him judge 100's of cases and determine the fates of so many people, but now she felt this burden to step forward. Again, not for herself.

 

I hate being that guy, I could never put myself in the victim's shoes. I think the investigation into it was a joke. I just do believe she had some serious credibility issues. 

 

The whole situation is a mess, I see both of your guys points. Like I said, I think you both make reasonable points and are intelligent.

 

I just think enough is enough in some instances, the situation is so muddled, we'll never know what happened unfortunately. 

 

Not trying to tell you guys to stop, I just don't see an end to it.

Edited by Ol Dirty B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ol Dirty B said:

 

I'm not sure, I don't really think he has a good temperament for a judge. Yet surprisingly most judges don't, however, they usually don't make it to the Supreme Court.

 

I don't really want to hijack the thread. I think the whole thing was a mess. I think she had her own credibility issues as well. 

 

Now she had her issues and felt she owed society this? She was trying to project herself as a martyr. She said she was forced to drink grain alcohol, but remembered a lot of details and knew what happened. Then, she also claims she witnessed it happening to others. Knowing her pain, wouldn't you feel obligated at that point to say something? She let him judge 100's of cases and determine the fates of so many people, but now she felt this burden to step forward. Again, not for herself.

 

I hate being that guy, I could never put myself in the victim's shoes. I think the investigation into it was a joke. I just do believe she had some serious credibility issues. 

 

The whole situation is a mess, I see both of your guys points. Like I said, I think you both make reasonable points and are intelligent.

 

I just think enough is enough in some instances, the situation is so muddled, we'll never know what happened unfortunately. 

 

Not trying to tell you guys to stop, I just don't see an end to it.

 

 

If she wanted to protect herself, should never would have volunteered to martyr herself.  I really can't think of a reason why it would otherwise occur to her to come forward.   Strangely, no one I have read or heard has made a credible claim as to why she spoke up after all this time, except for the reasons she gave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

 

 

If she wanted to protect herself, should never would have volunteered to martyr herself.  I really can't think of a reason why it would otherwise occur to her to come forward.   Strangely, no one I have read or heard has made a credible claim as to why she spoke up after all this time, except for the reasons she gave.

 

Fair enough how you read that. I don't completely agree, but I understand it. I could never put myself in her shoes. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Ol Dirty B said:

I'm not sure, I don't really think he has a good temperament for a judge. Yet surprisingly most judges don't, however, they usually don't make it to the Supreme Court.

 

I don't really want to hijack the thread. I think the whole thing was a mess. I think she had her own credibility issues as well. 

 

Now she had her issues and felt she owed society this? She was trying to project herself as a martyr. She said she was forced to drink grain alcohol, but remembered a lot of details and knew what happened. Then, she also claims she witnessed it happening to others. Knowing her pain, wouldn't you feel obligated at that point to say something? She let him judge 100's of cases and determine the fates of so many people, but now she felt this burden to step forward. Again, not for herself.

 

I hate being that guy, I could never put myself in the victim's shoes. I think the investigation into it was a joke. I just do believe she had some serious credibility issues. 

 

The whole situation is a mess, I see both of your guys points. Like I said, I think you both make reasonable points and are intelligent.

 

I just think enough is enough in some instances, the situation is so muddled, we'll never know what happened unfortunately. 

 

Not trying to tell you guys to stop, I just don't see an end to it.

 

The fact that Leland Keyser, a lifelong friend of Ford who Ford insisted was there that night, told the FBI that she had never attended a party where both Ford and Kavanaugh were present together, and that she felt pressured to change her story, tells me that Ford lacks credibility.  And when Ford was confronted by this fatal blow to her case, what does she do?  Blame it on Keyser's "health issues."  My jaw dropped when I heard that one.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...