Jump to content

President Donald J. Trump's Supreme Court Associate Justice Kavanaugh


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

I don't have dialogs with passive aggressive !@#$-muppets who lie.

 

I smash them with hammers.

 

You're getting a return volley for some nonsense you started, and are now blaming others.

 

!@#$ you.

 

Own your words, !@#$-muppet.

 

 

 

What are you even talking about? We're having an adult discussion here, and one that is pretty civil.

 

You're having some kind of fit. Work it through, brother. Deep breaths. 

 

Are you the guy who was calling me "Brock?" What does that mean?

Edited by BeginnersMind
  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

What are you even talking about? We're having an adult discussion here, and one that is pretty civil.

 

You're having some kind of fit. Work it through, brother. Deep breaths. 

Tasker has grown increasingly volatile when debating disingenuous morons.  It's a sign of a long career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BeginnersMind said:

 

Agree, Listen to both sides, and then judge. Right now I don't know much of her side and what little I do would have minimal credibility to overturn a nomination process. 

Just !@#$ off dude. You come across as such a cuckolded douche that it made my sperm count drop in half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

I was at the local high school the other day and caught a couple female teachers coming out of the break room. I showed 'em the many, many mugshots of female teachers arrested for sexual assaults on students. When I was done there I screamed at the white male teachers for the same thing, and reminded them that they are also un-oppressed. They were very receptive, except an English teacher who told me un-oppressed is not actually a word.

 

You probably shouldn't have been asking the follow-up question of "Would ya?" in the teacher's lounge.

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, KRC said:

 

Conditions? They should be:

-Show up

-Tell your story

-Answer questions

-Wait for histrionics from Spartacus

-Leave

 

Pretty simple.

 

I would add (somewhere between "Show up" and "Tell your story"):

 

- Swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

Edited by Koko78
  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

This is a very dangerous position for people to start spouting...

 

 

 

"For 250 years we have had Constitutionally protected rights of due process and presumption of innocence.   Enough is enough."

 

What the !@#$?

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

 

You would think with Trump and his followers pounding the 'fake news' label over and over and over that people like Cillizza, NYT, etc. try harder not to fall into his trap.

 

It's funny, because I get to watch these nutbags get called out for their laziness and stupidity, but it's not funny because even it's starting to verify that they truly are an enemy.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LABillzFan said:

 

You would think with Trump and his followers pounding the 'fake news' label over and over and over that people like Cillizza, NYT, etc. try harder not to fall into his trap.

 

It's funny, because I get to watch these nutbags get called out for their laziness and stupidity, but it's not funny because even it's starting to verify that they truly are an enemy.

 

We are at war. Every single one of us. Today, right this moment. It's not a shooting war (yet/hopefully never), but it is an (dis)information war unlike any that's been waged before it. 

 

The enemy of the people having a say in the process are making themselves loudly known. They're boasting about their goals and aims. It's not their fault, they feel they're entitled to remain in control. It's their birthright. 

 

But pride always comes before the fall. Gonna be a bumpy fall.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

We are at war. Every single one of us. Today, right this moment. It's not a shooting war (yet/hopefully never), but it is an (dis)information war unlike any that's been waged before it. 

 

The enemy of the people having a say in the process are making themselves loudly known. They're boasting about their goals and aims. It's not their fault, they feel they're entitled to remain in control. It's their birthright. 

 

But pride always comes before the fall. Gonna be a bumpy fall.

Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

We are at war. Every single one of us. Today, right this moment. It's not a shooting war (yet/hopefully never), but it is an (dis)information war unlike any that's been waged before it. 

 

The enemy of the people having a say in the process are making themselves loudly known. They're boasting about their goals and aims. It's not their fault, they feel they're entitled to remain in control. It's their birthright. 

 

But pride always comes before the fall. Gonna be a bumpy fall.

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

I would add (somewhere between "Show up" and "Tell your story"):

 

- Swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth

 

If only we could do that to the Senators in attendance.

21 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Cillizza is honestly saying that Trump is preventing the FBI from investigating an accusation well past its statute of limitations that isn't in the FBI's jurisdiction, and who has already said that they will not investigate?

 

What a !@#$ing idiot.

 

FIFY

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

Fair point, but I really trust her judgement. She's thorough, for example, her radiator is leaking in her car and she just bought 7 gallons of anti-freeze. Dealer can't find a problem, they say but she's sure of it. 

 

How she does it all and still finds time to make soup is beyond me. 

 

 

Does it look like split pea soup?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, BringBackOrton said:

Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state. Enemies of the state.

 

Just out of curiosity, what do you call blatant like this? He has over 650,000 followers that he is sending this lie to. 

 

And it's not even a 'kind of a lie.' He's stupid enough to post why it's a lie in his tweet.

 

What do you call that?

 

DnZRlKMU0AAnN0e.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...