3rdnlng Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Golden Goat said: Tom, I know your type. When you lose a point, you get angry and bash people. It's likely because -- in reality -- you're 4'10 and in a "female-led" relationship, with this being your only outlet to show your "manhood." I'm close, aren't I? You're probably shaking, and now I have you triggered for the whole night. Bliss! Oh boy. I had to go back for more. Edited June 22, 2018 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 4 minutes ago, Golden Goat said: Tom, I know your type. When you lose a point, you get angry and bash people. It's likely because -- in reality -- you're 4'10 and in a "female-led" relationship, with this being your only outlet to show your "manhood." I'm close, aren't I? You're probably shaking, and now I have you triggered for the whole night. Bliss! And it's a cat-led relationship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I'm not angry. Why would I be angry? You're wrong, and ANYONE who can read knows it. I'm not calling you an ignorant moron because I'm angry. I'm calling you an ignorant moron because you've just shown that trying to engage you is a waste of time. You didn't deny the 4'10, female-led thing. Interesting. 2 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Oh boy. He's going to lose. Badly. Edited June 22, 2018 by Golden Goat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 21 minutes ago, keepthefaith said: They become unaccompanied after they are separated from their adult parents/relatives/smugglers. Not under Obama's policy except in rare cases. Obama detained families trying to cross the borders illegally together (parents and children). A court ruling then made this illegal as children weren't allowed to be detained so Obama went back to the catch and release policy. When Trump made the zero tolerance policy and ended catch and release, he was required by law to separate children from their parents if they crossed the border illegally. I have no clue how Trump will continue his zero tolerance policy and not separate children from their parents. The ONLY fix to this is through legislation. Edited June 22, 2018 by Doc Brown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Not under Obama's policy except in rare cases. Obama detained families trying to cross the borders illegally (parents and children) together. A court ruling then made this illegal as children weren't allowed to be detained so Obama went back to the catch and release policy. When Trump made the zero tolerance policy and ended catch and release, he was required by law to separate children from their parents if they crossed the border illegally. I have no clue how Trump will continue his zero tolerance policy and not separate children from their parents. The ONLY fix to this is through legislation. Trump is making the most of an untenable situation. He's breaking the law (in 20 days) of course, but he's now the good guy and congress or the courts are going to take it on the chin over this. Edited June 22, 2018 by 3rdnlng Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 16 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said: Trump is making the most of an untenable situation. He's breaking the law (in 20 days) of course, but he's now the good guy and congress or the courts are going to take it on the chin over this. Then what? Will Congress actually have to pass bipartisan legislation instead of introducing separate bills and screaming that nobody from the other side will jump on board to fix the problem for these poor children? Of course in today's political environment, any sort of compromise means running the risk of getting primaried or not winning reelection. Edited June 22, 2018 by Doc Brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 hour ago, DC Tom said: I've seen enough to think they're 1) pretty crappy, and 2) rather left-leaning. Not as much as the NYT recently, but only because the NYT has become seriously pathetic. I had that thing delivered to my doorstep for years, and then CA had the recall election, and on the day of the election, the LA Times dropped a bombshell on Arnold cheating on his wife. They had the story...and they waited until election day to run it for maximum blast. (Not that it did any good. They called it for Arnold the moment the polls closed.) That was the last time I ever looked at it the LA Times, which was too bad because politics aside, I could whip through Sunday morning with a couple of pots of coffee, a fresh pack of Marlboro Lights, and their Sunday paper. Right through the funny pages and crosswords. Food. Entertainment. Great content. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azalin Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Golden Goat said: Where does it specifically state that the children held at this facility were unaccompanied? Exact quote, please. http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-texas-immigrant-children-20140618-story.html " Since October, 47,000 children have been caught crossing the southern border without parents or other family members, a more than 90% increase from last year, federal officials said. The number of unaccompanied children caught could reach 90,000 this year." That's a quote from the article you linked. They even use the word "unaccompanied". Edited June 22, 2018 by Azalin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 7 hours ago, DC Tom said: Actually, it doesn't. It specifically says the majority are unaccompanied minors. And even has a mention of a teenage mother and baby incarcerated together. Edit: Although here's a notable story on "Obama" separating families: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/15/immigration-boy-reform-obama-deportations-families-separated And another one: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/25/parents-deportation_n_5531552.html And another: https://fairimmigration.org/press/president-obama-must-stop-family-separation-crisis Again, we're being manipulated in to caring now. Who’s we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) Trump says GOP should 'stop wasting their time on immigration' until after midterms Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump said Friday Republicans should wait until after the November midterm elections to pass immigration legislation, undercutting Congress' ongoing efforts to pass a bill. "Republicans should stop wasting their time on Immigration until after we elect more Senators and Congressmen/women in November," Trump tweeted. "Dems are just playing games, have no intention of doing anything to solves this decades old problem. We can pass great legislation after the Red Wave Senate and House leaders have also been trying to find a bill that would end family separations at the border. https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/22/politics/trump-immigration-midterms/index.html I guess W and Congress were just playing games also Edited June 22, 2018 by ALF Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said: They think you're stupid. I liked hearing about how these children were being taught how to use a modern bathroom facility. That’s a good skill to have for when they go to public schools in the US. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 10 hours ago, Golden Goat said: You didn't deny the 4'10, female-led thing. Interesting. I don't respond to meaningless trolling. I'm not a Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 2 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I don't respond to meaningless trolling. I'm not a Democrat. You -- talking about meaningless trolling? ? ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 Just now, Golden Goat said: You -- talking about meaningless trolling? ? ? Fine. I'm 6'5", and in a cat-led relationship. Happy now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Fine. I'm 6'5", and in a cat-led relationship. Happy now? For now, yes. Quite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 Just now, Golden Goat said: For now, yes. Quite. Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. And illiteracy apparently enhances it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 minute ago, DC Tom said: Ignorance is bliss, I suppose. And illiteracy apparently enhances it. Tom, it's important that you understand this: Folks here pacify you because you’re that scrawny, hyperactive, petulant, MEAN special-needs boy that everyone feels obligated to care about, but really don’t. So they sit there and stolidly say things like, “wow… look at that picture… did you draw that?”—when it’s a faint, indiscernable smear of some sort. Let that sink in for a moment, Corky. ❤️ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 1 minute ago, Golden Goat said: Tom, it's important that you understand this: Folks here pacify you because you’re that scrawny, hyperactive, petulant, MEAN special-needs boy that everyone feels obligated to care about, but really don’t. So they sit there and stolidly say things like, “wow… look at that picture… did you draw that?”—when it’s a faint, indiscernable smear of some sort. Let that sink in for a moment, Corky. ❤️ I understand you believe you're giving me a taste of my own medicine, but let me explain to you why you're wrong: You're casting unsupported, counter-factual insults at me that. I, on the other hand, made the empirical observation that, because you posted an article you either didn't read, didn't understand, or willfully misrepresented; rejected three different clarifications you asked for; and rejected my good-faith attempt to make your point for you, that you are a thorough moron. You're not giving me a taste of my own medicine, because you're demonstrably too stupid to understand my posts. And you keep reinforcing that fact by doubling down on stupid. Now go finish your breakfast. Your paint chips are getting cold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
row_33 Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 26 minutes ago, Golden Goat said: Tom, it's important that you understand this: Folks here pacify you because you’re that scrawny, hyperactive, petulant, MEAN special-needs boy that everyone feels obligated to care about, but really don’t. So they sit there and stolidly say things like, “wow… look at that picture… did you draw that?”—when it’s a faint, indiscernable smear of some sort. Let that sink in for a moment, Corky. ❤️ nope, that's not the best read of DC Tom He is a major contributor to the best of this board... Try again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Golden Goat Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, DC Tom said: I understand you believe you're giving me a taste of my own medicine, but let me explain to you why you're wrong: You're casting unsupported, counter-factual insults at me that. I, on the other hand, made the empirical observation that, because you posted an article you either didn't read, didn't understand, or willfully misrepresented; rejected three different clarifications you asked for; and rejected my good-faith attempt to make your point for you, that you are a thorough moron. You're not giving me a taste of my own medicine, because you're demonstrably too stupid to understand my posts. And you keep reinforcing that fact by doubling down on stupid. Now go finish your breakfast. Your paint chips are getting cold? BTW, Tom, I apologize for making you rage quit last night. I knew you were easily triggered, but I had no idea to what extent. I now know, as evidenced by the fact that you said you don't reply to "trolling" -- yet you've done a remarkable job of replying to "trolling." You're either a liar or I just know what buttons to press to make you jump. Either way, I'm waiting to see why everyone here thinks you're so tough. So far you're firing blanks. 3 minutes ago, row_33 said: nope, that's not the best read of DC Tom He is a major contributor to the best of this board... Try again.... I knew a groupie or two would show up eventually... Tom can't fight his own battles, huh? ? Edited June 22, 2018 by Golden Goat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts