Jump to content

Why Is Our Government Putting People In Cages?


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ExiledInIllinois said:

I am an Xer... My son all Bernie because of the free education thing.  I am not Bernie or Karl.  I have more conservative in me.

 

Granted... Socialism great idea, but in pure sense... Will always get spoiled.

 

Seeing my what my father is going through with the VA system... I am even rethinking why a total socialized health system would be bad.  Not that a socialized isn't working great for my father the last 50+ years, it is.  I can just imagine how everybody would wreck it.

 

This is why we can't have nice things in this country... Why pure socialism wouldn't work.

 

It’s the boomer ex-hippies I’m talking about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:

 

It’s the boomer ex-hippies I’m talking about. 

Yeah... I would throw in Lost Generation too.  My parents.  Didn't fall for the counter culture trap because they were already raising a family... Yet, sympathized with the era.

 

Of course it's instilled in me, I am their kid... I am liberal too.  Yet, I could support Bernie, but would be very cautious. Another con man like Trump? I guess that's how my parents viewed the hippies, counter culture. Same with my 80 something inlaws.  They are glued to CNN, MSNBC, etc... /smh...

 

The Lost Generation is dying off though... Very few hold any power.

 

Anyway... Interesting topic.  Ideologies are blurring as much as they are polarizing.  As a Bernie supporter, my son has a very conservative streak in him that frightens me.  I probably shouldn't have sent him to Catholic school.  The worst kind of liberal.

 

The Purple on the electoral map is expanding! But... We'll never vote Red.  Blue Dogs all the way. ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe Third thing is really Louie Gohmert 

 

28 mins ago - Louie Gohmert compares jailing Paul Manafort (separating him from his adult children) with the Trump administration's systematic family ...
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While she was there... 
 

Nielsen announces deal with Mexico to overhaul asylum process, combat 'catch and release'
 

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen announced Thursday that the U.S. has secured an agreement with Mexico so that immigrants claiming asylum will be returned to Mexico as their cases are processed -- a bid to end the practice known as “catch-and-release.”

</snip>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

:lol::lol:

 

 

I guess he doesn't like being taken to task by a woman?   What a ***** idiot to go off like that on her and then when she comes back with a coherent response he walks out on her.  Senor Gutierrez needs to turn in his man card. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2018 at 10:25 PM, B-Man said:

Finally! Evidence of not one, but up to 18 deaths of migrants in US custody, seven due to subpar care.

 

Oh, wait. It was from the Obama admin from 2012-2015.

 

Nevermind.

 

https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/07/07/us-deaths-immigration-detention# 

 

DugMnHcVAAETdlE.jpg

 

 

 

Funny........................no uproar back then .....huh ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Father of 7-year-old who died in CBP custody says agents did everything they could to help her, has no complaints

 

 

.

 

,

 

Sir, excuse me — but President Obama was black. Do you not understand? He’s black and so he’s not racist. Those deaths were accidents or just interned sick people who were gonna die anyways. 

 

When a a person dies on Trumps watch it’s because of his final solution. Why is that hard to understand? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

She's one of the worst there is. 

 

She is one of my many examples on why we need to stop universal suffrage. She’s voted into office by parasites who consume welfare and clog the courts and jail cells. And she’s retarded. There’s also that. 

 

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/authorities-hunt-california-police-officers-killer-060059012.html

 

Regretable that it happened but if it happens I’m glad it happens in California. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The_Dude said:

 

She is one of my many examples on why we need to stop universal suffrage. She’s voted into office by parasites who consume welfare and clog the courts and jail cells. And she’s retarded. There’s also that. 

 

Sometimes I read your posts and wonder if you were dropped on your head as a kid. 

  • Haha (+1) 3
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Sometimes I read his posts and wonder if he was dropped on his head enough...

 

Your posts make me wonder if you even have a head. At least there’s enough in mine to never raise the doubt. 

1 minute ago, DC Tom said:

 

God, you suck at this.

 

If I did, you wouldn’t waste your time informing me of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

Sometimes I read your posts and wonder if you were dropped on your head as a kid. 

 

He makes his point rather inelegantly, with an angular harshness which makes the reader dive head long into disagreement; but it's one of the few opinions he has which I actually agree with.

 

The franchise should not be viewed as a right, but rather a privilege earned.  While there is no moral standing to denying someone the vote because of their color, race, creed, sex, sexuality, or any other immutable characteristic, there is a compelling moral argument to be made for restricting the pool of individuals who have a say in the size and scope of government to those whom have a direct stake in it's expansion.

 

My proposal would be an end to all birthright citizenship, regardless to nation of origin (including the US); and to institute a citizenship test composed of questions about US civics and history, basic economics and household finances.  I would couple that with an absolute demand of being a property or business owner (I'm flexible and would listen to other means testing, including being a net federal tax payer), or military service (reasonable accommodations made for the disabled). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

He makes his point rather inelegantly, with an angular harshness which makes the reader dive head long into disagreement; but it's one of the few opinions he has which I actually agree with.

 

The franchise should not be viewed as a right, but rather a privilege earned.  While there is no moral standing to denying someone the vote because of their color, race, creed, sex, sexuality, or any other immutable characteristic, there is a compelling moral argument to be made for restricting the pool of individuals who have a say in the size and scope of government to those whom have a direct stake in it's expansion.

 

My proposal would be an end to all birthright citizenship, regardless to nation of origin (including the US); and to institute a citizenship test composed of questions about US civics and history, basic economics and household finances.  I would couple that with an absolute demand of being a property or business owner (I'm flexible and would listen to other means testing, including being a net federal tax payer), or military service (reasonable accommodations made for the disabled). 

 

There was a reason it wasn’t in the bill of rights and it ain’t because it slipped their mind. 

 

Also, may I point to the decline of the British Empire after enfranchisement. But I’m sure the people who disagree with me are familiar with that and have studied it. 

10 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:

 

Me? 

 

Especially you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

He makes his point rather inelegantly, with an angular harshness which makes the reader dive head long into disagreement; but it's one of the few opinions he has which I actually agree with.

 

The franchise should not be viewed as a right, but rather a privilege earned.  While there is no moral standing to denying someone the vote because of their color, race, creed, sex, sexuality, or any other immutable characteristic, there is a compelling moral argument to be made for restricting the pool of individuals who have a say in the size and scope of government to those whom have a direct stake in it's expansion.

 

My proposal would be an end to all birthright citizenship, regardless to nation of origin (including the US); and to institute a citizenship test composed of questions about US civics and history, basic economics and household finances.  I would couple that with an absolute demand of being a property or business owner (I'm flexible and would listen to other means testing, including being a net federal tax payer), or military service (reasonable accommodations made for the disabled). 


It is so difficult to read between the misogyny and racism that I often wonder if there is a point to his posts.

Thank you for taking the time to dissect it. 

Edited by Buffalo_Gal
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


It is so difficult to read between the misogyny and racism that I often wonder if there is a point to his posts.

Thank you for taking the time to dissect it. 

 

Not a problem.

 

He, more often than not, takes backwards and morally questionable positions; but I don't use that as a blanket disqualifier for any and all positions he takes.  Even the dopiest or most socially abhorrent occasionally stumble upon the truth or accidental wisdom.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


It is so difficult to read between the misogyny and racism that I often wonder if there is a point to his posts.

Thank you for taking the time to dissect it. 

 

If you ever asked I’d list reasons. Chivalry, ya know. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

 

She has essentially become the @Coach Tuesday of the DNC. Every month or so she jumps in, says something embarrassingly stupid, and then disappears for two months before anyone can ask a follow up question.


I gotta remember that. Although I did learn there are three different types of plagues today, so sometimes responding to a goofball leads to a learning experience. ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

Sometimes I read his posts and wonder if he was dropped on his head enough...

Sometimes I wonder if it's time for The_Dude to get a Planned Parenthood intervention.

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I gotta remember that. Although I did learn there are three different types of plagues today, so sometimes responding to a goofball leads to a learning experience. ? 

That goofball has Cliff Claven level knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

 

The franchise should not be viewed as a right, but rather a privilege earned.  While there is no moral standing to denying someone the vote because of their color, race, creed, sex, sexuality, or any other immutable characteristic, there is a compelling moral argument to be made for restricting the pool of individuals who have a say in the size and scope of government to those whom have a direct stake in it's expansion.

 

 

My wife always ***** about people who do not own any property having a say regarding how much property taxes people should pay.  Now that I rent (made a decent profit when I sold my house in Oakland last year and sitting on the cash until the housing market comes back to earth here) I say "fleece the *****!!"  LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

That goofball has Cliff Claven level knowledge.

 

...I am going to take that as a compliment. Thank you, sir. 

30 minutes ago, LABillzFan said:

CA Cop killed by illegal.

 

I suspect leftists see this as a win-win: one escaped illegal and one dead cop.

 

I feel for the cop but it couldn’t have happened in a state that deserves it more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...