Chandler#81 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 8 hours ago, Manther said: I am confident I can't suggest what the Bills do because I don't know how they have the QBs graded out. That dictates everything. We have the ammo to get almost anyone. But, depends on your grading of them vs each other and more importantly probably a 20 year sample size or more. Come on McBean, let's get this one right! This is why you lift all those weights! You spent your life getting to this spot and here you go with all the ammo and 6 QBs (more than usual) available.......you got this guys!! There are SOOO many moving parts and I feel our team is prepared for almost (if not) all of them. Go Bills!! It’s really pretty scary what Beane will do. He’ll live or die on this selection of unproven talent. We’ve mortgaged so damn much to be in this position -including trading our 3 yr starter at QB, that I’d say we HAVE to mortgage even more to get one of these QB’s that have been touted for 2 years now. Bottom line: Nobody knows.. I wouldn’t want Beane’s job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALF Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 If the Bill's can trade up to #2 there is no guarantee he will not be a bust or get a severe injury . Drafting a QB is a big gamble ,the transition to the NFL is too big, but this is the draft to try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jr1 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Build around AJ and sign Logan Woodside after the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Oh come on!!! You guys are slacking ... GMFB and no one posted this yet?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 10 hours ago, Reed83HOF said: Just trade up to #2and get it over...ugh We are positioned as such that we can make a "godfather" offer (something like 12 / 22 / 53 / 56 / 65 / 2019 1st for #2 / 108 / 2019 4th) and still only be "down" a 2nd and 1 future pick (which could be offset with a later pick). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 5 hours ago, Thurmanator 12074 said: I know one thing Mcbean will not draft Rosen. The guy just does not fit with the process and what we’re trying to do here. You can’t have QB’s questioning the QB coach or Offensive coordinator. Rosen just needs to go to a big city team that’s more his style. So i don’t think under any circumstance he will end up a Buffalo Bill. I’m ion Record that the Bills would draft Josh Allen if they had the number 1 pick in the NFL draft. Keep up the Anti-Rosen campaign, It is working with teams around the NFL....He's falling right into our laps! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloSol Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 16 minutes ago, horned dogs said: Keep up the Anti-Rosen campaign, It is working with teams around the NFL....He's falling right into our laps! You think Thurmanator has that much power? Hmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aristocrat Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Someone will drop. Pounce. Be patient Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 11 minutes ago, BuffaloSol said: You think Thurmanator has that much power? Hmm Joke dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eball Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 I'm still pretty certain they're going to move up so they can take one of their top 3 -- I'm just not sure how they have them ranked. After reading @thebandit27 's QB review I'm much more bullish on Allen than I was previously, although I still think he ranks 3rd behind Darnold and Rosen. It would shock me for them to stand pat at #12. I believe they'll trade #12, next year's 1st, and a slew of other picks but keep #22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Chuck Wagon said: We are positioned as such that we can make a "godfather" offer (something like 12 / 22 / 53 / 56 / 65 / 2019 1st for #2 / 108 / 2019 4th) and still only be "down" a 2nd and 1 future pick (which could be offset with a later pick). Because QBs are so valuable you have to do whatever it takes unless you're the Giants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 10 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Because QBs are so valuable you have to do whatever it takes unless you're the Giants. Or I've said multiple times I think the Giants take a QB, but hey, you seem to struggle with comprehension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 2 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said: Or I've said multiple times I think the Giants take a QB, but hey, you seem to struggle with comprehension. Then why did you give an example of us trading for the Giants pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boca BIlls Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 50 minutes ago, aristocrat said: Someone will drop. Pounce. Be patient Yea, grab the scraps and don't worry about a guy you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 10 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: Then why did you give an example of us trading for the Giants pick? To have a conversation about a potential (though unlikely) move. Gettleman has said multiple times they are looking for a "hall of fame" potential player. If they find him, regardless of position, they are going to stay. If they don't I think it's likely they would rather have our bounty of picks than just moving back with a team like Denver. I'm not in the Giants meetings, so I don't know how they've evaluated the players, and neither are you, so step off your high horse and don't play topic police when people discuss hypotheticals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 3 minutes ago, Chuck Wagon said: To have a conversation about a potential (though unlikely) move. Gettleman has said multiple times they are looking for a "hall of fame" potential player. If they find him, regardless of position, they are going to stay. If they don't I think it's likely they would rather have our bounty of picks than just moving back with a team like Denver. I'm not in the Giants meetings, so I don't know how they've evaluated the players, and neither are you, so step off your high horse and don't play topic police when people discuss hypotheticals. So we wait for the Giants to think none of the QBs are worth replacing a 37 year old with, and then we pounce! Cool. My hypothetical is that we trade a 5th to Philly for Wentz because they already have a Super Bowl tested QB and Wentz is injury prone. Then we can ship Peterman and a 6th to Seattle for Wilson to help with their youth movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Wagon Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 10 minutes ago, 4merper4mer said: So we wait for the Giants to think none of the QBs are worth replacing a 37 year old with, and then we pounce! Cool. My hypothetical is that we trade a 5th to Philly for Wentz because they already have a Super Bowl tested QB and Wentz is injury prone. Then we can ship Peterman and a 6th to Seattle for Wilson to help with their youth movement. Hey everyone! Stop talking about QBs. 4merper4mer has spoken! No fun or conversation allowed on the message board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramza86 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 I think there will be some pretty good non QB players because of the QB rush. So we could get some talent in the first without taking a QB. I think there will be more regret not trading up for one of those QBs and them panning out vs trading up for one and him not panning out. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 11 hours ago, scribo said: A few observations: 1. Why does it seem so many former players/now-commentators push for Lamar Jackson? And "tall"? 2. It is hard to fathom that the Bills won't pick a QB in the first-round because the media has hyped it up so much. 3. There are going to be potential all-pros available at #12, especially if the first four picks of the draft at the same position. The hype train for certain prospects seems to have hit the stride. Allen and Jackson are the latest examples. It's a combination of multiple factors why Buffalo likely takes a QB: 1) The trades to accumulate picks the past year. 2) Buffalo not having a long term answer at QB. 3) The team's comments and actions last season about a QB. 4) The draft itself and 5) number of higher quality/hyped QB prospects coming out this year 1 hour ago, aristocrat said: Someone will drop. Pounce. Be patient In this draft I wouldn't expect a QB to drop. There are too many teams with needs or a threat to take one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reed83HOF Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 1 hour ago, Chuck Wagon said: We are positioned as such that we can make a "godfather" offer (something like 12 / 22 / 53 / 56 / 65 / 2019 1st for #2 / 108 / 2019 4th) and still only be "down" a 2nd and 1 future pick (which could be offset with a later pick). That is just ridiculous to look at... 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts