PromoTheRobot Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 Like the Redskins did with RG3 and Cousins. Don't trade up but take the QB that falls to you, plus a next-rung QB in a lower round like White or Lauletta? As a hedge against busting out our as an asset to deal later? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodneykm Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 Yes, if the second had enough potential 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsredneck1 Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 (edited) i would if it made sense...like if someone ne was going to take the next time they're up was there...or with one of the 2 5ths, like fergy. edit...actually i'd take that last pick and give it to denver for kelly. Edited February 9, 2018 by billsredneck1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spielman Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 Yes, I would draft Jackson and Lauletta. Preferably in the 1st and 4th rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mead107 Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 No, to many other needs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 As long as they plan on addressing WR, LB, RB, OL and DL via free agency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 I think we have too many holes at this point to pull that off, but I wouldn't be upset if they paired Rudolph and either Mike White or Riley Ferguson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seanbillsfan2206 Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 1 minute ago, mead107 said: No, to many other needs 2nd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swnybillsfan Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 i would not be opposed to it, but we just took the flyer on peterman last year. i know he had that historic half, and hasn't exactly shown signs of being incredible. but i would consider him to be a project worth continuing. having said that, "we are always looking to improve our roster". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Brown Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 Thanks to the rookie wage scale, if Rudolph and Jackson were there at #21 and #22 I would take both of them in the 1st round. At best you'd develop two great quarterbacks and get some excellent compensation for one of them in a future trade. At worst they're both busts and we draft the top qb prospect next year. We still have two 2nd rounders to address other positions. In reality, we could easily pick one in the 1st and one in the later rounds like the OP suggested. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill from NYC Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 I suppose. I was hoping that they acquired Alex Smith AND drafted a 1st round qb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoTier Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 49 minutes ago, PromoTheRobot said: Like the Redskins did with RG3 and Cousins. Don't trade up but take the QB that falls to you, plus a next-rung QB in a lower round like White or Lauletta? As a hedge against busting out our as an asset to deal later? Not unless the second QB was the BPA in the 6th or 7th round because the Bills have too many holes to waste picks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John from Riverside Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 It would depend on the ceiling of the 2nd qb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoTier Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 19 minutes ago, Doc Brown said: Thanks to the rookie wage scale, if Rudolph and Jackson were there at #21 and #22 I would take both of them in the 1st round. At best you'd develop two great quarterbacks and get some excellent compensation for one of them in a future trade. At worst they're both busts and we draft the top qb prospect next year. We still have two 2nd rounders to address other positions. In reality, we could easily pick one in the 1st and one in the later rounds like the OP suggested. This post is nonsense. How exactly does a team develop two great QBs at the same time? Are the QBs alternating snaps or games or what? And how would a team even know if both were busts after only one year if they were constantly being shuffled in and out of the line-up? I suppose you were one of those who declared Jared Goff a bust last season or have annointed DeShon Watson the greatest QB of all time based on his limited rookie season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 No for me, we have too many holes. I would still trade up and have a vet. I know that you are expending the same resources but you’d be getting a safer prospect. A QB at 21 and one in the 3rd or whatever isn’t increasing your odds of success as much as a better prospect is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 4 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: No for me, we have too many holes. I would still trade up and have a vet. I know that you are expending the same resources but you’d be getting a safer prospect. A QB at 21 and one in the 3rd or whatever isn’t increasing your odds of success as much as a better prospect is. Plus you aren’t rolling with peterman and two rookies... so they have to like him enough to move on from NP unless it’s a real late prospect that can go practice squad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimer1960 Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 Wouldn''t be opposed to sitting tight and taking Rudolph or Jackson or other QB at 21 and then following up maybe as early as the 3rd with a Mike White or Kyle Lauletta. The implication being that they would think White or Lauletta was a significant upgrade over Peterman - if not, then no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffaloHokie13 Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, NoSaint said: Plus you aren’t rolling with peterman and two rookies... so they have to like him enough to move on from NP unless it’s a real late prospect that can go practice squad Peterman is still eligible for PS too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackOrton Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 9 minutes ago, Kirby Jackson said: No for me, we have too many holes. I would still trade up and have a vet. I know that you are expending the same resources but you’d be getting a safer prospect. A QB at 21 and one in the 3rd or whatever isn’t increasing your odds of success as much as a better prospect is. We have no bigger need than QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted February 9, 2018 Share Posted February 9, 2018 2 minutes ago, BuffaloHokie13 said: Peterman is still eligible for PS too! And I’m not a huge fan but I think McD is who knows about our knew oc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts