Jump to content

Horowitz's DOJ IG Report


Recommended Posts

Just now, Real News said:

 

Pretzel logic, but I can see it.

 

Thanks.

 

Pretzel logic is the one you're employing. You're saying these reports contradict one another but they don't. Carter just is not clear in her report because she has limitations (as noted earlier) in this investigation.

 

The OIG cannot prosecute or indict. That's not his job. The report does not make recommendations, just reports facts. Carter does not understand that fully (or bungled the clarity of it in her report) - PS does though, hence the "difference" in their words. But the effect is the same. Both are saying the OIG found criminal activity in his investigation and has engaged Huber for indictment and prosecution. That's what Huber is there for. That's why he was hidden for 6+ months. He's been working in secret on this for awhile. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Pretzel logic is the one you're employing. You're saying these reports contradict one another but they don't. Carter just is not clear in her report because she has limitations (as noted earlier) in this investigation.

 

The OIG cannot prosecute or indict. That's not his job. The report does not make recommendations, just reports facts. Carter does not understand that fully (or bungled the clarity of it in her report) - PS does though, hence the "difference" in their words. But the effect is the same. Both are saying the OIG found criminal activity in his investigation and has engaged Huber for indictment and prosecution. That's what Huber is there for. That's why he was hidden for 6+ months. He's been working in secret on this for awhile. 

 

 

 

We'll see.

 

Thanks for the discussion.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Real News said:

 

Pretzel logic, but I can see it.

 

Thanks.

latest?cb=20130425133019

8 minutes ago, Real News said:

 

We'll see.

 

Thanks for the discussion.

tenor.gif?itemid=5980544

11 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Pretzel logic is the one you're employing. You're saying these reports contradict one another but they don't. Carter just is not clear in her report because she has limitations (as noted earlier) in this investigation.

 

The OIG cannot prosecute or indict. That's not his job. The report does not make recommendations, just reports facts. Carter does not understand that fully (or bungled the clarity of it in her report) - PS does though, hence the "difference" in their words. But the effect is the same. Both are saying the OIG found criminal activity in his investigation and has engaged Huber for indictment and prosecution. That's what Huber is there for. That's why he was hidden for 6+ months. He's been working in secret on this for awhile. 

 

 

tenor.gif

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Twofold: Spite and opsec. 

 

By nature of who was/is behind Trump and what they were trying to accomplish, it'd be safer for her and who's behind her if he was forever toxic. Losing the election and then a criminal trial revealing he was attempting to undermine the republic would assure no one ever took anything he said in future seriously. 

 

But mainly it was spite and her hateful nature. Like Trump, the Clintons enjoy revenge. He's just better at it. 

 

Exactly.

 

And a side note: As excellent as Carter is on this subject, she's still missing a lot. She's been slow to understand Huber's role and slow to understand that the OIG is going to be far more about FISA than Clinton's emails. The report that's about to drop is just the Clinton email investigation - it'll be detailed and thorough, but will be less damning and lengthy than the other reports Horowitz is finalizing (imo). 

 

 

No. He was not. He was one of the primary targets. 

 

Clockwork:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-national-doral-miami-resort-shots-fired-man-police-custody-today-2018-5-18/

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/05/18/texas-high-school-on-lockdown-following-reports-active-shooter.html

 

 

Dude, you're freaking me out.

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2018 at 2:05 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

 

ABC count?

 


 

 

 

The always reliable Jacob Wohl who gained popularity by commenting on Trump tweets. This guy Is the definition of a propagandist.

 

And he was wrong. Shocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Real News said:

 

The always reliable Jacob Wohl who gained popularity by commenting on Trump tweets. This guy Is the definition of a propagandist.

 

And he was wrong. Shocked.

 

Just so I’m understanding, your definition of real news is anything that emanates from corporate media, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Real News said:

 

The always reliable Jacob Wohl who gained popularity by commenting on Trump tweets. This guy Is the definition of a propagandist.

 

And he was wrong. Shocked.

 

What was he wrong about?  The only statement he made was that he was "working to confirm rumors".

 

Do you have evidence that he did not work to confirm any rumors?

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...