Jump to content

Nunes Memo to be Released


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I do notice. But I don't care. I expose your idiocy when appropriate because it's dangerous. You've been shilled so hard you don't even realize that you're a useful idiot for people who wish to see you kept deaf, dumb, and blind. 

 

And I know the Young Turks. I work in Hollywood where they wish they could be. How do I know that? Because they're star-fukkers. They're hacks - as they've conclusively demonstrated to me during several conversations I've had with them. 

 

Are you Crowder?  lol

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Moron, DR, have you noticed I don't ever quote you or respond to you for like a month now?  That is because I view you as the wild eyed fukstick at the end of the bar.  I made the mistake of making eye contact once and you have been a complete confrontational jerk since that day.  Never again, you !@#$ing lunatic.   Back on ignore.  Out.

 

By the way, The young Turks has a live Youtube show weeknights from 6-8pm eastern.  Check it out.  You'll love it.

One of my favorite authors when I was developing certain philosophies on life was a guy named Robert Ringer. A couple of his books were "Winning Through Intimidation" and "Looking Out For #1". Putting aside the titles, there was much to be gained by the content. The whole "Winning Through Intimidation" had nothing to do with brow beating someone or making them face the sun during a meeting. It had to do with preparing yourself in such a thorough way that your knowledge and preparation would not only impress the other person, but intimidate them.

 

DR has done a thorough job of research on the whole Deep State subject that it would appear that he intimidates you. Frankly speaking, in comparison to him you don't know jackshit. Maybe instead of blocking him you should pay a little attention to what he posts.

  • Like (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bob in Mich said:

Too funny.  They said the same about you when I had them all over to my place to hobnob.  We are tight, as you  must already know.

 

They laugh at you, and all the people who believe the **** they are paid to spew. 

 

I know this because I've seen them do it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Moron, DR, have you noticed I don't ever quote you or respond to you for like a month now?  That is because I view you as the wild eyed fukstick at the end of the bar.  I made the mistake of making eye contact once and you have been a complete confrontational jerk since that day.  Never again, you !@#$ing lunatic.   Back on ignore.  Out.

 

By the way, The young Turks has a live Youtube show weeknights from 6-8pm eastern.  Check it out.  You'll love it.

Now if you could just leave or stop being a child it'd be great. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/16/2018 at 1:01 PM, Deranged Rhino said:

Yet another new Flynn filing... 

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6234142/20/united-states-v-flynn/

 

The footnotes imply Sullivan believes Flynn's right to due process has been violated...

DWL2lMWVwAANKwN.jpg

***********

Oh, hi, John! Was wondering when we were going to get to you officially. 

 

Buckle up, Mr. Secretary. History is going to destroy your legacy. 

 

 

 

This might explain Sullivan's decision - at least in part:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I do notice. But I don't care. I expose your idiocy when appropriate because it's dangerous. You've been shilled so hard you don't even realize that you're a useful idiot for people who wish to see you kept deaf, dumb, and blind. 

 

And I know the Young Turks. I work in Hollywood where they wish they could be. How do I know that? Because they're star-fukkers. They're hacks - as they've conclusively demonstrated to me during several conversations I've had with them. 

 

I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked.  It is coke, isn't it?  Of course you are not going to admit to illegal drug use on here but if you have a problem, you should set aside your 'work' here and get yourself some help.  Seriously.  I have seen that stuff do bad things to good people and seen it turn their minds to mush.  Users are so confident and convinced that they are doing fantastic that they fail to see all the screw ups they are making.  I am not a medical professional but you appear to me to be clearly manic and without a doubt, delusional too.

 

I am dangerous for what exactly?  Didn't you claim that I am just repeating the MSM narrative?  If that is so and this is my platform versus the multimedia platform of the MSM, I can't imagine any person (thinking clearly) could label me as dangerous due to my PPP postings.  I can imagine a sleep deprived, delusional, hyper confrontational, self proclaimed savior with a coke problem coming to that conclusion.

 

I find it funny that we come from different angles but both want the Mueller investigation to go on until he is finished, against the wishes of many of the posters here.  We also agree that if the FISA warrant process was abused, the abusers should be held accountable and improvements to the process should be made.  So, although you feel compelled to insult my sources or reasoning after every post, you apparently agree with me.   Brilliant, sniffles!  More evidence that you are not thinking clearly.

 

Here's another Young Turks clip from nearly a year ago - 4/4/17.  I would trust this guy's opinions over yours every time.  I certainly don't agree with anyone's every opinion and I am certain there are examples where they've been wrong but I trust much more of what they put out than what I have been reading from you.

 

young turks

Edited by Bob in Mich
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked.  It is coke, isn't it?  Of course you are not going to admit to illegal drug use on here but if you have a problem, you should set aside your 'work' here and get yourself some help.  Seriously.  I have seen that stuff do bad things to good people and seen it turn their minds to mush.  Users are so confident and convinced that they are doing fantastic that they fail to see all the screw ups they are making.  I am not a medical professional but you appear to me to be clearly manic and without a doubt, delusional too.

 

I am dangerous for what exactly?  Didn't you claim that I am just repeating the MSM narrative?  If that is so and this is my platform versus the multimedia platform of the MSM, I can't imagine any person (thinking clearly) could label me as dangerous due to my PPP postings.  I can imagine a sleep deprived, delusional, hyper confrontational, self proclaimed savior with a coke problem coming to that conclusion.

 

I find it funny that we come from different angles but both want the Mueller investigation to go on until he is finished, against the wishes of many of the posters here.  We also agree that if the FISA warrant process was abused, the abusers should be held accountable and improvements to the process should be made.  So, although you feel compelled to insult my sources or reasoning after every post, you apparently agree with me.   Brilliant, sniffles!  More evidence that you are not thinking clearly.

 

Here's another Young Turks clip from nearly a year ago - 4/4/17.  I would trust this guy's opinions over yours every time.  I certainly don't agree with anyone's every opinion and I am certain there are examples where they've been wrong but I trust much more of what they put out than what I have been reading from you.

 

young turks

 

 

I'm just asking for a friend, but is this coke problem something that smoking pot can cure?

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked.  It is coke, isn't it?  Of course you are not going to admit to illegal drug use on here but if you have a problem, you should set aside your 'work' here and get yourself some help.  Seriously.  I have seen that stuff do bad things to good people and seen it turn their minds to mush.  Users are so confident and convinced that they are doing fantastic that they fail to see all the screw ups they are making.  I am not a medical professional but you appear to me to be clearly manic and without a doubt, delusional too.

 

I am dangerous for what exactly?  Didn't you claim that I am just repeating the MSM narrative?  If that is so and this is my platform versus the multimedia platform of the MSM, I can't imagine any person (thinking clearly) could label me as dangerous due to my PPP postings.  I can imagine a sleep deprived, delusional, hyper confrontational, self proclaimed savior with a coke problem coming to that conclusion.

 

I find it funny that we come from different angles but both want the Mueller investigation to go on until he is finished, against the wishes of many of the posters here.  We also agree that if the FISA warrant process was abused, the abusers should be held accountable and improvements to the process should be made.  So, although you feel compelled to insult my sources or reasoning after every post, you apparently agree with me.   Brilliant, sniffles!  More evidence that you are not thinking clearly.

 

Here's another Young Turks clip from nearly a year ago - 4/4/17.  I would trust this guy's opinions over yours every time.  I certainly don't agree with anyone's every opinion and I am certain there are examples where they've been wrong but I trust much more of what they put out than what I have been reading from you.

 

young turks

If you only toned down your reaction to not be such a little B word, dude, you'd do so much better responding.

 

Your tireless complaints of being upset/offended/called out lack in you calling others out which is much worse.

 

Your take is never horrible, because it's usually based off of an angle others don't take. But if you just stop whining and talking about others you'll get much further. 

 

Food for thought with the disclosure that your purpose here is much different than myself so while I critique you for this I choose an entirely different premise here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boyst62 said:

If you only toned down your reaction to not be such a little B word, dude, you'd do so much better responding.

 

Your tireless complaints of being upset/offended/called out lack in you calling others out which is much worse.

 

Your take is never horrible, because it's usually based off of an angle others don't take. But if you just stop whining and talking about others you'll get much further. 

 

Food for thought with the disclosure that your purpose here is much different than myself so while I critique you for this I choose an entirely different premise here. 

 

People like him would be muttering on a park bench before the internet, maybe he is doing that the rest of day? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked.  It is coke, isn't it?  Of course you are not going to admit to illegal drug use on here but if you have a problem, you should set aside your 'work' here and get yourself some help.  Seriously.  I have seen that stuff do bad things to good people and seen it turn their minds to mush.  Users are so confident and convinced that they are doing fantastic that they fail to see all the screw ups they are making.  I am not a medical professional but you appear to me to be clearly manic and without a doubt, delusional too.

 

I am dangerous for what exactly?  Didn't you claim that I am just repeating the MSM narrative?  If that is so and this is my platform versus the multimedia platform of the MSM, I can't imagine any person (thinking clearly) could label me as dangerous due to my PPP postings.  I can imagine a sleep deprived, delusional, hyper confrontational, self proclaimed savior with a coke problem coming to that conclusion.

 

I find it funny that we come from different angles but both want the Mueller investigation to go on until he is finished, against the wishes of many of the posters here.  We also agree that if the FISA warrant process was abused, the abusers should be held accountable and improvements to the process should be made.  So, although you feel compelled to insult my sources or reasoning after every post, you apparently agree with me.   Brilliant, sniffles!  More evidence that you are not thinking clearly.

 

Here's another Young Turks clip from nearly a year ago - 4/4/17.  I would trust this guy's opinions over yours every time.  I certainly don't agree with anyone's every opinion and I am certain there are examples where they've been wrong but I trust much more of what they put out than what I have been reading from you.

 

young turks

When you're losing an argument you think it's appropriate to make charges of illicit drug use against the person you're arguing with?

 

You're just another weak minded !@#$ who resorts to ad hom attacks and a litany of other logical fallacies in order to protect yourself from having to examine the failing elements of your own argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TakeYouToTasker said:

When you're losing an argument you think it's appropriate to make charges of illicit drug use against the person you're arguing with?

 

You're just another weak minded !@#$ who resorts to ad hom attacks and a litany of other logical fallacies in order to protect yourself from having to examine the failing elements of your own argument.

 

for sure, it's obvious who is addicted to maryanne on this board...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snafu said:

 

 

I'm just asking for a friend, but is this coke problem something that smoking pot can cure?

 

I think we should immediately cease talk here about any alleged coke problem that DR may or may not have. Бобинмичиган created this dossier based on nothing more than pure speculation from his sources in the mother country. In addition, I believe that there may have been a tragic mistake in translation. My sources said that DR was quoted that he likes to drink a Coke while cooling off in his shower that has gold plated fixtures.

 

We all know that DR is in the midst of writing a book. Disparaging his reputation is the last thing he needs now and he may have to author this book under a pen name because of it. May I suggest Bic Cross?

4 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

for sure, it's obvious who is addicted to maryanne on this board...

 

 

Maryjane too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, 3rdnlng said:

I think we should immediately cease talk here about any alleged coke problem that DR may or may not have. Бобинмичиган created this dossier based on nothing more than pure speculation from his sources in the mother country. In addition, I believe that there may have been a tragic mistake in translation. My sources said that DR was quoted that he likes to drink a Coke while cooling off in his shower that has gold plated fixtures.

 

We all know that DR is in the midst of writing a book. Disparaging his reputation is the last thing he needs now and he may have to author this book under a pen name because of it. May I suggest Bic Cross?

Maryjane too.

 

you can't be too careful...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked.  It is coke, isn't it?  Of course you are not going to admit to illegal drug use on here but if you have a problem, you should set aside your 'work' here and get yourself some help.  Seriously.  I have seen that stuff do bad things to good people and seen it turn their minds to mush.  Users are so confident and convinced that they are doing fantastic that they fail to see all the screw ups they are making.  I am not a medical professional but you appear to me to be clearly manic and without a doubt, delusional too.

 

I am dangerous for what exactly?  Didn't you claim that I am just repeating the MSM narrative?  If that is so and this is my platform versus the multimedia platform of the MSM, I can't imagine any person (thinking clearly) could label me as dangerous due to my PPP postings.  I can imagine a sleep deprived, delusional, hyper confrontational, self proclaimed savior with a coke problem coming to that conclusion.

 

I find it funny that we come from different angles but both want the Mueller investigation to go on until he is finished, against the wishes of many of the posters here.  We also agree that if the FISA warrant process was abused, the abusers should be held accountable and improvements to the process should be made.  So, although you feel compelled to insult my sources or reasoning after every post, you apparently agree with me.   Brilliant, sniffles!  More evidence that you are not thinking clearly.

 

Here's another Young Turks clip from nearly a year ago - 4/4/17.  I would trust this guy's opinions over yours every time.  I certainly don't agree with anyone's every opinion and I am certain there are examples where they've been wrong but I trust much more of what they put out than what I have been reading from you.

 

young turks

You are a real piece of work. I think marijuana has effected your thinking and judgement, because post is offensive and ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bob in Mich said:

Aw, you guys are sweet.  Love you all too.

Hey, man.  You're the piece of **** making baseless charges of illicit drug use in place of an argument in order to intentionally discredit someone.

 

That sort of behavior should be bannable.

 

Edit:  And you think it's funny.  You really are a slimy !@#$, Bob.  No surprise you're a liberal given your devout inability to accept responsibility for your poor behavior.

Edited by TakeYouToTasker
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, westside said:

You are a real piece of work. I think marijuana has effected your thinking and judgement, because post is offensive and ridiculous. 

What's your excuse? Paint chips or glue sniffing? You never have any legitimate points to make at all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former CIA director John Brennan’s tweet to Trump (“When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America…America will triumph over you.”)

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

What's your excuse? Paint chips or glue sniffing? You never have any legitimate points to make at all 

I think you and boob have been doing to much shotgunning when you get high. Liberalism is your brain on drugs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Former CIA director John Brennan’s tweet to Trump (“When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. You may scapegoat Andy McCabe, but you will not destroy America…America will triumph over you.”)

 

 

19e4w4.jpg

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bob in Mich said:

 

I was sitting here wondering how a formerly reasonable poster had changed into such a jerk and once I recalled that you mentioned Hollywood, it all just clicked. 

 

You don't need to wonder. I tried engaging in a reasonable discussion with you, you responded with insults and ignorance. I went hard after you, and then tried to pull back and even apologized for being short to reset the conversation... your response was to hurl more insults and belittling.

 

You brought it on yourself. Of course if you put the blunt down long enough to preserve a short term memory, you'd understand this already.  

 

So now when you fling nonsense about this subject (which you've proven and admitted you know nothing about) I stomp on it because what you're pushing is ignorance and you've made it clear you're not interested in having a civil conversation. 

 

Get tougher Bob. Or get smarter. Keep spouting ignorance and I'll keep pointing out how shallow your depth of understanding on this topic is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

You don't need to wonder. I tried engaging in a reasonable discussion with you, you responded with insults and ignorance. I went hard after you, and then tried to pull back and even apologized for being short to reset the conversation... your response was to hurl more insults and belittling.

 

You brought it on yourself. Of course if you put the blunt down long enough to preserve a short term memory, you'd understand this already.  

 

So now when you fling nonsense about this subject (which you've proven and admitted you know nothing about) I stomp on it because what you're pushing is ignorance and you've made it clear you're not interested in having a civil conversation. 

 

Get tougher Bob. Or get smarter. Keep spouting ignorance and I'll keep pointing out how shallow your depth of understanding on this topic is.

I hate it when you sugar coat things.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

Attorney statement versus the OPR statement. What does this look like to you?

DYmJWOdU8AANwIL.jpg

 

It looks to me like CRIMINAL CHARGES SOON for McCabe.

Which is which specifically to make you believe this?

 

Just trying to get a more solid understanding though it seems pretty basic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boyst62 said:

Which is which specifically to make you believe this?

 

Just trying to get a more solid understanding though it seems pretty basic.

 

By McCabe's attorney's own admission, the DOJ and OIG denied them access to the OIG report. The only explanation for why this would be denied to counsel is if parts of the OIG report were being used by a grand jury in a criminal investigation. 

 

If the OIG report - which is done - wasn't being used as evidence in criminal proceedings, they would have had to share it in full with McCabe's attorney. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

By McCabe's attorney's own admission, the DOJ and OIG denied them access to the OIG report. The only explanation for why this would be denied to counsel is if parts of the OIG report were being used by a grand jury in a criminal investigation. 

 

If the OIG report - which is done - wasn't being used as evidence in criminal proceedings, they would have had to share it in full with McCabe's attorney. 

That doesn't necessarily mean they'll be charges against McCabe. That could be an indictment against Trump for colluding with Loompaland

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Boyst62 said:

That doesn't necessarily mean they'll be charges against McCabe. That could be an indictment against Trump for colluding with Loompaland

 

It does. McCabe's attorney wanted to see everything in the IG report about McCabe, not the entire IG report. He was denied access to other bits about his client likely because McCabe is already in the process of being indicted by a grand jury.

 

We know that Sessions has an outside prosecutor working hand in hand with the IG, he revealed that two weeks ago. It's not in DC, it's not in Virginia. My bet - because Trump loves to troll - is that the grand jury is being held in Little Rock where we know there is an active FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation ongoing. 

 

There's no reason to think the IG report has anything to do with team Trump. It began before he was in office and deals with oversight of the DOJ and FBI - the IG doesn't have the authority to investigate Trump or the campaign. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/russia_report_findings_and_recommendations.pdf

 

Note McCabe's op Ed in WaPo today as well... He knows what's coming. 

 

The real question is "Why is Russia so much better at psy-op's than the US?"

Cuz apparently, they have been able to bring an American presidential election into doubt.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, OJABBA said:

 

The real question is "Why is Russia so much better at psy-op's than the US?"

Cuz apparently, they have been able to bring an American presidential election into doubt.

 

 

Yup. 

 

Or, the other question I ask - and get blank looks in return - is if people believe Russia's IC is capable of running such a successful campaign against us, doesn't that mean our own IC is capable of doing the same thing against us? 

 

If someone answers no to that question, and yes to your question, it exposes the ignorance or partisanship. 

 

Brennan and Clapper were the "Russian" agents trying to muck up our election. 

 

Both will be answering for their crimes. 

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, more trouble here for Hillary 

 

 

British authorities raided the London offices of data firm Cambridge Analytica late Friday amid allegations the company illegally harvested millions of people’s personal Facebook data to influence U.S. elections. More than a dozen officers from the Information Commissioner’s Office entered the premises after being granted a warrant for the search by a High Court judge. The information watchdog is believed to be probing possible links between the data firm and the UK Brexit referendum after a former employee told British media the data firm “misled” the public while working for Leave.EU, one of the major Brexit campaign groups. The regulator said early Saturday it had gathered evidence from the data firm and will “consider the evidence before deciding the next steps and coming to any conclusions.” Separately, India’s government has also begun scrutinizing the data firm, having sent a notice to the company demanding information on which Indian entities it has worked with and the methods it used to acquire data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nanker said:

 

Too long; didn't read. 

I wish that when I did something wrong I'd have the forum of the Washington Post OpEd page to tell my side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, snafu said:

 

Too long; didn't read. 

I wish that when I did something wrong I'd have the forum of the Washington Post OpEd page to tell my side. 

Get our mentally imbalanced President to rant about you on twitter, then you can do that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...