Jump to content

Well? Have You Checked Her Out? Stormy Daniels!


Tiberius

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, GoBills808 said:

Like the overwhelming desire to eat a pork chop is somehow comparable to a person's longing for love and companionship in a socially normative relationship?

 

A pork chop? Surely not.

 

Bacon? That's an entirely different story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

She's back! 

 

Stormy Daniels sues President Trump over alleged affair and 'hush ...

4 hours ago - Washington (CNN)A new lawsuit filed by the porn star known as Stormy Daniels claims President Donald Trump never signed a hush agreement regarding an alleged sexual encounter between the two and therefore the agreement is void. According to the legal complaint filed in California ...
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, row_33 said:

now we have something to interest the filthy mind of degenerate pagan liberals again

 

 

Oh, we are pagans now? And Trump was banging the chick but liberals are the pervs? You suck! 

 

I love how when Clinton was president all the Good Christian moralizers were saying you can't trust a man who cheats on his wife. And now, with a guy no one in their right mind would trust to babysit even an egg, he is suddenly ok. Right wing=complete bull sh it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's be clear, though: the basis of her suit is that Trump did not sign the NDA himself, personally, but instead had his legal representative sign it.

 

That...is laughable.  This suit should be thrown out of court post-haste.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone is missing the point here! Who cares if the suit has any basis in standing? It's more press. That's all these people who have associated themselves with this nutbag Trump ever want. Look at that Nunberg creep. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will Stormy release the sexts from Trump?

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Someone is missing the point here! Who cares if the suit has any basis in standing? It's more press. That's all these people who have associated themselves with this nutbag Trump ever want. Look at that Nunberg creep. 

 

There's a damn good chance Trump violated campaign finance laws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, row_33 said:
You've chosen to ignore content by Tiberius. Options

You've chosen to ignore content by garybusey. Options

You've chosen to ignore content by Bob in Mich. Options

 

 

Heaven, I'm in heaven...

 

 

No.......no ignore

 

Then we would miss classic Gator nonsense like.....................

 

"Who cares if the suit has any basis in standing? It's more press".

 

 

As if "Stormy's" desire for press is somehow to be blamed on "nutbag Trump"

 

It's even funnier when you realize that he authored the thread..............

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.......no ignore

 

Then we would miss classic Gator nonsense like.....................

 

"Who cares if the suit has any basis in standing? It's more press".

 

 

As if "Stormy's" desire for press is somehow to be blamed on "nutbag Trump"

 

It's even funnier when you realize that he authored the thread..............

 

 

Lol, yup, nothing to do with Trump and the crowd that clings to him. You are great! 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, B-Man said:

 

 

No.......no ignore

 

Then we would miss classic Gator nonsense like.....................

 

"Who cares if the suit has any basis in standing? It's more press".

 

 

As if "Stormy's" desire for press is somehow to be blamed on "nutbag Trump"

 

It's even funnier when you realize that he authored the thread..............

 

 

 

they started getting hostile, so off with their head's betsie wetsie

 

and that LA thing goes 10,000 words and too much to even bother scrolling

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

One happened in the Oval Office - and he wasn't impeached for it. He was impeached for lying about it. Difference. 

 

 

perjuring oneself before a grand jury is worthy of impeachment

 

and was delivered BAM!!!! to Slick Willy

 

it wasn't worthy of conviction by the Senate

 

but it sure was fun to watch  :D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

One happened in the Oval Office - and he wasn't impeached for it. He was impeached for lying about it. Difference. 

 

The bigger concern should be: why was Clinton even asked about it, and what did it have to do with Starr's Whitewater investigation?

 

The answer is, of course, that once you appoint a special prosecutor, they have an open-ended mandate to investigate anything and everything they possibly can.  When you're charging witnesses with lying in response to questions that have absolutely nothing to do with what you're investigating, you're not finding wrong-doing, you're manufacturing it.  

 

I point this out because it's more than passingly applicable to Mueller's investigation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

The bigger concern should be: why was Clinton even asked about it, and what did it have to do with Starr's Whitewater investigation?

 

The answer is, of course, that once you appoint a special prosecutor, they have an open-ended mandate to investigate anything and everything they possibly can.  When you're charging witnesses with lying in response to questions that have absolutely nothing to do with what you're investigating, you're not finding wrong-doing, you're manufacturing it.  

 

I point this out because it's more than passingly applicable to Mueller's investigation.

 

Your point about the special counsel's probe being able to morph is accurate. 

 

The notion that Trump sleeping around will have any impact on his ability to win re-election is what's laughable. Pushing the story is only going to make Trump more popular to his base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Your point about the special counsel's probe being able to morph is accurate. 

 

The notion that Trump sleeping around will have any impact on his ability to win re-election is what's laughable. Pushing the story is only going to make Trump more popular to his base.

 

No, him not insincerely apologizing for it is going to make him more popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

so there is no difference between

 

a)  a consensual sexual encounter, be it with wife, girlfriend, mistress, hooker

 

and

 

b)  a pig using his position of power to force a woman to have to watch him play with his wingwang or perform a sexual act that she has stated she does not want to

 

good brains there liberals...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tiberius said:

That's why the pathological liar Trump is running so scared of Mueller! 

 

The liberal crowd loves to cling to the "Trump is a pathological liar" rhetoric.

 

Yeah, and Trump is so scared of Mueller that he said ON RECORD that he has no problem being questioned by Mueller.

 

But, continue on with your liberal talking points that ring on deaf ears.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...