ganesh Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 2 hours ago, John in Jax said: Yes, I did. LOL Seattle is Scum. The Legion of Bums! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldTimeAFLGuy Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 19 hours ago, ganesh said: The Legion of Bums! ...Pete Carroll.....nuff said............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SlimShady'sSpaceForce Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Bits and pieces When listening to the radio on my drive home I heard something I need to ask. how much talent does Jax have at the WR position? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiotAct Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 20 hours ago, 26CornerBlitz said: Blake Bortles talking smack. Ha.. this is a great quote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 14 minutes ago, OldTimeAFLGuy said: ...Pete Carroll.....nuff said............ The inmates always run the asylum wherever Carroll is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Even the Seattle Times referred to the Seahawks as Sore Losers in a headline. This is way out of character for them. They're usually Seahawk back pocket boys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, reddogblitz said: Even the Seattle Times referred to the Seahawks as Sore Losers in a headline. This is way out of character for them. They're usually Seahawk back pocket boys. Seriously??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 minute ago, horned dogs said: Seriously??? Seriously. Seattle sports writers are the anti-Jerry Sullivan/Vic Carucci. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LABILLBACKER Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 21 hours ago, Commonsense said: Meanwhile Doug is eating a sandwich. Can Bortles be the 2017 version of Dilfer? That defense is Ravens type of good. Seattle quickly went for likeable to a pile of douches. When was Seattle ever likeable? Have we forgotten Sherman's dirty shot on Carpenter's leg. Carroll has always been a cocky d bag.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
26CornerBlitz Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tcali Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Marrone is a WINNER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 I was listening to Golic and Wingo briefly this morning and they had a discussion about what precipitated this. They said that it was because the Seahawks were trying to bowl over the Jags' center, and thus Bortles, to force a fumble and get the ball back. Little Mike (Golic) said that it was wrong of Seattle to do because there's an understanding that when a team goes into the victory formation, the other team knows to accept it. Big Mike said screw that because the game was within a TD and Seattle had just scored a TD on 1 play and there is no understanding and just a desire to win the game. He actually got pretty heated with his son, which I found interesting. Previously I thought like Little Mike, but now I think I'm on Big Mike's side. So what do you guys think? If a game is within a TD and the other team goes into the victory formation, should the defense simply accept it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 23 hours ago, Commonsense said: Meanwhile Doug is eating a sandwich. Can Bortles be the 2017 version of Dilfer? That defense is Ravens type of good. Seattle quickly went for likeable to a pile of douches. Seattle's always been a pile of douches. What, with dick sherman and michael bennett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punching Bag Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Doc said: So what do you guys think? If a game is within a TD and the other team goes into the victory formation, should the defense simply accept it? Depends. If you have a chance to sack a QB you will play in game later in year maybe. Would Seasquacks expect the Jaguars to honor it when Seattle does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teddy KGB Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Bortles on fire lately. Love the trash talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 12 minutes ago, Limeaid said: Depends. If you have a chance to sack a QB you will play in game later in year maybe. Would Seasquacks expect the Jaguars to honor it when Seattle does it? If you do it, you can't take exception when another team does it back to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 18 minutes ago, Limeaid said: Depends. If you have a chance to sack a QB you will play in game later in year maybe. Would Seasquacks expect the Jaguars to honor it when Seattle does it? Wilson plays the whole season without O-line protection. He's the true NFL MVP. I'm sure he would care or even notice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 On 12/10/2017 at 7:36 PM, Commonsense said: Meanwhile Doug is eating a sandwich. Can Bortles be the 2017 version of Dilfer? That defense is Ravens type of good. Seattle quickly went for likeable to a pile of douches. Bologna for the win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddogblitz Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 5 hours ago, Doc said: I was listening to Golic and Wingo briefly this morning and they had a discussion about what precipitated this. They said that it was because the Seahawks were trying to bowl over the Jags' center, and thus Bortles, to force a fumble and get the ball back. Little Mike (Golic) said that it was wrong of Seattle to do because there's an understanding that when a team goes into the victory formation, the other team knows to accept it. Big Mike said screw that because the game was within a TD and Seattle had just scored a TD on 1 play and there is no understanding and just a desire to win the game. He actually got pretty heated with his son, which I found interesting. Previously I thought like Little Mike, but now I think I'm on Big Mike's side. So what do you guys think? If a game is within a TD and the other team goes into the victory formation, should the defense simply accept it? I don't think a team has to accept it if they don't want to. I've wondered for years why a team doesn't have some guy try to guess the snap count and jump over and hit the QB to make him fumble. Something like that. If you guess wrong it's a penalty. Oh well. It's just one of the unwritten football rules I guess. But I think it's dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts