Jump to content

Stop linking to Buffalo News aritcles


xsoldier54

Recommended Posts

 

16 whole hours, and the free articles are stale.

 

He's probably the type that stands in front of the microwave and yells "Hurry up!" What the hell did this yahoo do when there only newspapers to read?

yell at cars driving by because they looked fast but were under the speed limit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How long until twobillsdrive starts charging to be a memeber and per post. Charge per level of membership.

 

Its a slippery slope, not a good thing.

 

 

Imo

The slippery slope was laid by Google and Craigslist, who thought it was a good idea to give away expensive content for free, until they realized that undermining the creation of that content is bad for their business.

 

Why do you think the Google is suddenly playing nice with news organizations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SDS -- keep doing exactly what you're doing. Hopefully these ingrates will just leave and it will clean up things a bit around here.

Every now and again you get a thread where nearly everyone I'd consider blocking land on the same side of an issue. I'm not talking people I disagree with but the ones where if there were more of them I'd log out and not come back

 

 

Could the articles be fine tuned? Maybe a little but I think the icon nails it as far as solutions go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

16 whole hours, and the free articles are stale.

 

He's probably the type that stands in front of the microwave and yells "Hurry up!" What the hell did this yahoo do when there only newspapers to read?

 

TBD is toughening people up with all this waiting around!

 

Besides, you don't come TBD for the articles, if you know what I mean... :flirt:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine since the ads are an additional outside revenue. The subscription is to read the content, not block the ads.

I have to wonder if they'd make more advertising $$$ if they had higher viewership because they dropped the fee. I'm sure people have explored this, but I'm not sure how to save the newspaper industry. Time to do some serious adapting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing in life is free. The subscripton of three dollars might look small, but they get most of their real money from advertising. Posting so much of their content on one site is valuable and is worth a lot more to them than you would realize. I really enjoy the camaraderie on this forum, and what link us all is our love for all things bills. The front page could do with less content from the Buffalo news, because we know they are trying to sell subscription services for free. The fact that you the owner don't benefit from that makes it worse.

Count me in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to wonder if they'd make more advertising $$$ if they had higher viewership because they dropped the fee. I'm sure people have explored this, but I'm not sure how to save the newspaper industry. Time to do some serious adapting.

The industry tried the free model for 15 years. The trend is go back to subscriptions. Like I mentioned earlier, you would need to read 1000 articles in one month for them to earn the $3 in a subscription.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The industry tried the free model for 15 years. The trend is go back to subscriptions. Like I mentioned earlier, you would need to read 1000 articles in one month for them to earn the $3 in a subscription.

I'm a pretty big reader, but it seems they may have made the right choice! YIKES!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a pretty big reader, but it seems they may have made the right choice! YIKES!

A paper like the New York Times might get $7-8 per 1000 page views. Most local papers don't have that pull. Those payout rates keep dropping. That's why many have given up chasing pennies. They used to be nickels.

 

So, it's just math. How many subscribers do you need to make up for the large drop in advertiser revenue. I think someone posted that the Washington Post did a study and said they would lose 82% of their readership and they still went subscription based.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Is this actually a threat to have people boycott TBD? That's hilarious. :lol:

 

My pitchfork is ALWAYS lit.

 

Since there's no one we want to fire on the coaching staff, what with the bye week, we might was well go after TBD!

 

To quote Nelson Muntz "Gotta nuke something."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

My pitchfork is ALWAYS lit.

 

Since there's no one we want to fire on the coaching staff, what with the bye week, we might was well go after TBD!

 

To quote Nelson Muntz "Gotta nuke something."

 

My amusement was more that the idea that leroi has any sort of following. He strikes me as more the "loon with a sandwich board on a street corner" type of boycotter.

 

Really, anyone who'd follow him in a boycott is someone we're likely better off without anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought you said you were going to use ignore? What's taking so long? You're still complaining about people complaining.

 

I just have to ask. are you not complaining about the people complaining, about people complaining?

 

 

not a trick question.

 

 

jfr. bn could not lure me to a subscription and I never went out of my way to read their stuff unless what was quoted. just not a good source even being the hometown news.

 

 

jmo

Edited by DaBillsFanSince1973
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...