Jump to content

The Tyrod Taylor Question


Recommended Posts

 

I agree and look forward to this. I just can't see Tyrod excelling in the WCO when the standard was Montana. 1-3 step drops and fire? I haven't seen Tyrod do that once. Sure, Steve Young made the HOF scrambling from the WCO, but he was also deadly on the short throws. I WANT to see Taylor excel in this, but if not, it's a 'Break it' year.

 

This is exactly my concern. Yes rolling Tyrod out seems like a good fit...... but the WCO that Kubiak and Dennison ran in Houston with Schaub had a LOT of shorter timing throws where the footwork and the release and the receiver's break all have to be on point. That is not Tyrod's strength.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Sooo... how good do these things need to be for you?

 

You realize Taylor is already 14th in 3rd down % and 6th in RZ Passer Rating, right?

I think the fact that people are so dismissive of the 2017 QB draft class is kind of funny. Weren't three QBs drafted in the first round? Didn't all three QBs have their respective teams trade up to draft them? The bills had an opportunity to draft two of those three quarterbacks. They didn't. I understand that no one wants to see that as any kind of faith and Taylor because of the draft picks they acquired for next year. But if anything, it was a team demonstrating both faith in Taylor while also hedging their bets and understanding that the NFL is a win now league and Taylor isn't proven enough to hold onto after this year if he fails.

 

That doesn't mean anything other than the fact that all QBs fail at some point in their career mainly and largely if you're thinking about team success. Philip Rivers has been for years. Drew Brees. Andrew luck. Joe Flacco. Cam Newton.

 

But all of those guys are proven to varying degrees. Taylor hasn't built up the cache to be even just average this year and stick around. He's going to likely need a top 10-12 year to stick around.

 

Just watch next year turn into the same "week QB class" we had this year. Too funny :doh:

The QBs goong in the first is because of the value of the position. By all analysis of this draft prior to it shown it was weak. And next year right now looks very strong but could also flop as the season goes on as well as who declares and who doesnt could weaken it.

 

But by all people that look at this stuff professionally have stated that this class was very weak ala 2014 class

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.wgr550.com/articles/news/bills-open-camp-asking-familiar-question-tyrod-taylor-their-franchise-qb

 

 

 

While in Carolina for nineteen years, Brandon Beane saw first-hand what having a franchise quarterback can do for an NFL organization.

“It’s a quarterback league, I mean who are we kidding?,” the Bills new general manager said.

Prior to Newton’s arrival, the Panthers finished above .500 only once in five years. After selecting the Auburn product first-overall in 2011, Carolina was in the playoffs three years later, starting a run of three straight NFC South division titles. That matched the number of times they were division champs in their entire eighteen-year franchise history up to that point. Then in 2015, the Panthers finished the regular season 15-1, played in the Super Bowl, and Cam was walking around as the league’s MVP.

So Beane knows how important it is to have that franchise guy.

“If you look at the playoff teams, the consistent guys that at least qualify for the playoffs or are close every year, most of them have QBs. Most of them have a legit quarterback,” Beane said. “If you want to use the word franchise, whatever word you want to use, so I understand that. Cam in Carolina was, is, a franchise quarterback. If you’re a GM, you have to find a franchise quarterback. It obviously helps keep you on a consistent playing field if you have one, so I get that.”

Now Beane is tasked with finding out if Tyrod Taylor is the Bills’ franchise QB. Beane got a chance to see Taylor up close for the first time during OTAs and minicamp in June. He liked what he saw on and off the field.

“Well, it’s just the spring, but I’ll tell you this about Tyrod,” he said then. “I come in early to workout with some of the guys and he’s in here early. The guy does every single thing asked of him, above and beyond, and that’s what you’re looking for. I respect the heck out of what I’ve seen here the five or six weeks I’ve been here. I’m looking forward to watching him take this challenge on and see how it goes in camp, then obviously two weeks in that leads to games, and see how it progresses. I’ve watched him from afar on cross-film, but I did go back and watch some games last season, flipped through some of his throws. Some of it before I got here, some of it since I got here. I mean he’s got some tools. He wasn’t accidentally thrown into a starting role here, he’s earned his opportunities.”

The soon-to-be 28 year old Taylor came to Buffalo as a free agent prior to the 2015 season. He won the starting job that training camp and has been the team’s starting QB the past two seasons. But that was all under head coach Rex Ryan and GM Doug Whaley. Now, playing on a restructured contract that would allow the team to walk away at the end of the year and not cost much in dead money, Taylor is essentially on a one-year “prove it” deal. And he’s not playing for Ryan and Whaley anymore. He’s auditioning for Beane and new head coach Sean McDermott.

Regular season games are what will ultimately matter, but Beane has already been watching enough film on Taylor that he’s getting a good idea of what he likes and what areas he still needs to get better.

“First of all, in defense of him, the systems have changed a little bit,” the GM said. “He was in Baltimore (then) came up here. In a perfect world you can sit in one offensive scheme, similar coaches or the same coaches, and build upon it. When it has changed a few times, that makes it a little harder. Obviously, the things he’s done great are his feet. He’s made plays not only with his feet but his arm, and I think he’s been tough. I see that. He seems like he’s made smart decisions. I’m not saying he hasn’t made some that weren’t smart, but they all do that. To be in this league, whether its Tyrod or name the quarterback, you have to make plays consistently from the pocket. The quarterbacks that are succeeding year after year after year consistently make plays from the pocket. That’s what, whoever the franchise quarterback is going to be, that’s what he’ll have to do.”

So what exactly does Taylor have to do to convince the new Bills regime that he should be the quarterback beyond 2017? How will Beane know he’s found his man? What’s he looking for in a franchise QB?

“Obviously, you draw them up, from a physical standpoint, they look like Cam,” he said, referring to Newton in Carolina. “But how many are there like that? You want a guy, the stature, the height, you know, they're standing over, they're not worried about linemen in their face. It gives them the vision and all that. Arm strength.

“You obviously want to see quarterbacks live, but what's this guy's makeup? What's his leadership? Do guys rally behind him? I go back to Carolina. Jake Delhomme, one of the greatest leaders I've ever been around. He was undrafted. The guy willed himself to lead the team the years he was in Carolina. His intangibles were a 12 on a one to 10 scale. And that's how he overcame his athletic limitations…..you're looking for a lot of things, some of it physically we can all see. But a lot of it you can't necessarily see.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But by all people that look at this stuff professionally have stated that this class was very weak ala 2014 class

 

 

That isn't true. There was a majority saying it was a weaker class.... but there are plenty of very well respected voices who disagreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same Tyrod as last year but with good defense and the Bills are an 11-win team.

 

But a good defense will be a much bigger challenge against the Quarterbacks on this schedule. So the chances of winning games with Tyrod throwing for 200 yards are, I would say, much smaller. I'm not obsessing over pass yards v rush yards by the way..... I agree ultimately it is just "yards" and wins that matter, but I suspect even with an improved defense this slate of Quarterbacks will mean we end up in more shoot outs and having to throw more to catch up / keep pace.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same Tyrod as last year but with good defense and the Bills are an 11-win team.

 

11-3 after the two losses to the Pats.

 

C'mon..............................................................................................

You are the chip B word at the weekly poker game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, if he is going to remain there are a few things that I need to see. Gross stats mean nothing at all to me. I care about 3rd down efficiency, RZ efficiency, TD to Int and a high yards per attempt. If those things happen the offense's will be rolling.

 

 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?archive=false&conference=null&role=TM&offensiveStatisticCategory=TEAM_PASSING&defensiveStatisticCategory=null&season=2016&seasonType=REG&tabSeq=2&qualified=false&Submit=Go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defense was 16th in the league in points against.

 

As far a points go, that is dead nuts average.

The problem, ironically, is similar to the issue with Taylor. When the defense was good, they were quite good. Against the Bengals, the defense bailed out the offense the whole game. I think that's about the only time that happened all year. However, the lows of the defense were much lower than Taylor's lows. The Bills defense arguably single-handedly lost four games in 2016. When you allow 200 yard rushers, you are most certainly are not going to win. And the bills allowed and historic three of them, two of those to the same player. On top of that, for whatever you want to say about Taylor not playing well in the second half, the defense just had to be decent against the Raiders for us to win. But they weren't, they fell apart. I should probably throw the first Jets game and allowing Ryan Fitzpatrick a career game as the fifth, but the offense couldn't stay on the field despite scoring points and racking up yards.

 

Taylor had lows in 2016 for sure. Baltimore, the Bengals, most of the Pittsburgh game, 2nd half of the Raiders, etc. But his lows simply weren't as low as the bottom of the defensive lows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TT. was sacked more than any QB in the NFL this past season. Fix that too.

Not saying this doesn't need to be fixed, but I think it's overstated. He was sacked 42 times last year. Luck, Dalton, and Wilson were all sacked 41 times last year. In 2015, Bortles was sacked 51 times. Rodgers 46, Wilson 45, ASmith 45, Tannehill 45, Stafford 44, Bridgewater 44.

 

Over the 2 year span Wilson, Bortles, Rodgers, and Stafford have all been sacked more than Tyrod. It's not a coincidence that all of those QBs but Stafford are also in the Top 6 for rushing yards over the same span.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The QBs goong in the first is because of the value of the position. By all analysis of this draft prior to it shown it was weak. And next year right now looks very strong but could also flop as the season goes on as well as who declares and who doesnt could weaken it.

 

But by all people that look at this stuff professionally have stated that this class was very weak ala 2014 class

 

The draft is so different now than it used to be. You used to want to go as early in the draft as possible to get that huge bradford payday. Now you enter as early as possible to get to UFA a year beforehand.

TT. was sacked more than any QB in the NFL this past season. Fix that too.

 

 

Not saying this doesn't need to be fixed, but I think it's overstated. He was sacked 42 times last year. Luck, Dalton, and Wilson were all sacked 41 times last year. In 2015, Bortles was sacked 51 times. Rodgers 46, Wilson 45, ASmith 45, Tannehill 45, Stafford 44, Bridgewater 44.

 

Over the 2 year span Wilson, Bortles, Rodgers, and Stafford have all been sacked more than Tyrod. It's not a coincidence that all of those QBs but Stafford are also in the Top 6 for rushing yards over the same span.

 

We were 4th from the bottom in sacks allowed. SF, CLE, and LAR all allowed more sacks, they just had more QBs.

 

15th in yardage surrendered from those sacks.

Edited by dneveu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not saying this doesn't need to be fixed, but I think it's overstated. He was sacked 42 times last year. Luck, Dalton, and Wilson were all sacked 41 times last year. In 2015, Bortles was sacked 51 times. Rodgers 46, Wilson 45, ASmith 45, Tannehill 45, Stafford 44, Bridgewater 44.

 

Over the 2 year span Wilson, Bortles, Rodgers, and Stafford have all been sacked more than Tyrod. It's not a coincidence that all of those QBs but Stafford are also in the Top 6 for rushing yards over the same span.

 

 

Yeah, but Dalton and Wilson had 100 more attempts than TT. Bortles had almost 200 MORE attempts than TT in 2016.

 

TT was sacked every 10 attempts last year: that's Rob Johnson territory I think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Yeah, but Dalton and Wilson had 100 more attempts than TT. Bortles had almost 200 MORE attempts than TT in 2016.

 

TT was sacked every 10 attempts last year: that's Rob Johnson territory I think.

Weird. His sack % is 8.8, not 10. Goff and Kaep were higher last year.

 

In 2015, his sack % was 8.7. Kaep, Mariota, Bridgewater, and ASmith were all equal or higher.

 

Again, it's fine to say it needs to improve, but why embellish? The stats are readily available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weird. His sack % is 8.8, not 10. Goff and Kaep were higher last year.

 

In 2015, his sack % was 8.7. Kaep, Mariota, Bridgewater, and ASmith were all equal or higher.

 

Again, it's fine to say it needs to improve, but why embellish? The stats are readily available.

 

 

Weird: ? 432 attempts / 42 sacks = 10.38 I hope! :cry:

 

Team sacks has 8.8.

 

https://www.sportingcharts.com/nfl/stats/sacked-percentage/2016/

Edited by San-O
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...