Jump to content

CTE in nearly 90 percent of football players


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Science is only "real" science when it confirms what I want to believe. You should also never let facts get in the way of a good crusade. These are big mistakes that "scientists" make all the time.

 

Every thought of mine is science, every thought of yours that I don't agree with is rank superstition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This makes me really really sad. It may be the reason I eventually stop watching football. WHY IS BASEBALL SO BORING?!

 

 

At what point do we draw the line on assumption of risk. Things like MMA and boxing are legal (and probably worse) for the brain than NFL football. But we don't accept death matches under the "assumption of risk" theory -- why not though? I mean if two dudes enter a ring knowing it is a fight to the literal death, shouldn't we let them do it? They are assuming the risk aren't they?

 

We in society have to draw a line on monetizing inherently dangerous activities. Is wrong to pay people to undertake serious health risks? It is something I struggle with as a sports fan for sure. Especially when they start out as kids as you noted. Kids and a lot of them in poverty and don't know better.

100000% disagree. If two willing adults want to play a sport in which they're left incapacitated or dead so be it. Free will and Darwin and lots of great positive attribute associated.

 

@JeffDarlington

 

Thomas Davis on CTE studies: "I would be lying if I said I didn't get nervous about that stat. But this game, I just love it so much."

thebsecond he says he is suffering after his career or has any lingering effects I'll be glad to tell him.this.

 

Davis gets it let's see if he is man enough to stick to his word down the line or just stupid enough to think we will let it slide when he reneges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100000% disagree. If two willing adults want to play a sport in which they're left incapacitated or dead so be it. Free will and Darwin and lots of great positive attribute associated.

 

Sounds good, but when they are old and pathetic the juries will feel sorry for them.

 

Cheering them on to this obvious end down the road makes us kind of culpable as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Sounds good, but when they are old and pathetic the juries will feel sorry for them.

 

Cheering them on to this obvious end down the road makes us kind of culpable as well.

only if you feel guilt or you're they're momma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The level of denial in this thread is embarrassing. Why can't people simply admit that they like following a sport that is obviously hazardous to human health?? I admit it. It ain't pretty, but it's the truth. As I've long maintained, I would have likely been a gladiator fight fan in ancient Rome, but I like to think that I would have been holdimg my thumb down (symbolizing swords down) when the Editor asked the crowd for a vote on the fate of the loser. But at least I admit that I probably woild have been a gladiatorial combat fan.

Please explain your point with evidence. I suggest reading this if you get a chance, btw -- https://www.amazon.com/Death-Expertise-Campaign-Established-Knowledge/dp/0190469412 . Whatever mistakes scientists may make, they're far more reliable than skeptics of science (because - get this - scientists aren't correct 100 percent of the time!) on the internet who basically don't have a clue about what they're talking about. I could go on.

 

Is this how far we've fallen that a post dripping in complete and utter sarcasm is taken as serious...

 

...checks a certain fellas twitter....

 

Oh, sorry, I should have used some sarcasm smileys or something. It can be tough to tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I see it, if the players know the risk and still play, I am okay watching. Much like spectators watch a stunt performer do life threatening tricks they themselves would never try. But I would never call someone who walks away from the game at any level a quiter. I may call them smart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way I see it, if the players know the risk and still play, I am okay watching. Much like spectators watch a stunt performer do life threatening tricks they themselves would never try. But I would never call someone who walks away from the game at any level a quiter. I may call them smart.

 

Yes. exactly. I'm the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those hung up on the selection bias, from the NYT article;

 

 

Yeah but it's important for people on the Internet to feel smarter than scientists. Does the article address that?

 

And continuing to beg the question: How can anyone let their kid play football in the face of these staggering odds?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but it's important for people on the Internet to feel smarter than scientists. Does the article address that?

 

And continuing to beg the question: How can anyone let their kid play football in the face of these staggering odds?

Since 2011, just under 1,700 players are on rosters in the NFL each year. Over 1 million kids play high school football and over 73,000 play college football each year . http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/football

 

Does the research address that?

 

I am one of the probably hundreds of millions of kids/men who played high school football and suffer no CTE-like symptoms. Does the research address that?

 

Does it address the tens of millions of college football athletes out there not suffering CTE symptoms?

 

According to the CTE website, over 425 brains have been donated, 270 have CTE. https://www.bu.edu/cte/brain-donation-registry/ Only over 100 were presented from football players in this study. Does the research address that?

 

Medical standard of care for concussion assumes that highest risk of permanent damage is when more head trauma occurs while a person is recovering from a concussion. Does the research address this?

 

What the research does is diagnose CTE in over 100 brains donated by football players. Most were likely donated because the person suffered behavioral/neurological deficits consistent with CTE. That is a highly biased, highly limited sample.

 

Is there a big problem here? Absolutely. Does this mean I am smarter than the scientists who did the research? Nope, just trying to realistically frame and understand it.

 

Does this mean there are "staggering odds" my son will have CTE from playing high school football? Nope.

 

But go ahead and question other's intelligence. I am certainly questioning yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but it's important for people on the Internet to feel smarter than scientists. Does the article address that?

 

And continuing to beg the question: How can anyone let their kid play football in the face of these staggering odds?

 

Certainly smarter than people who didn't read "the science" but think they understand it.

 

The study was facile. Useful...but simplistic and hardly conclusive. The Times' article is less scientific than Gary's post, above (which wouldn't be winning any medals for its scienceyness anytime soon.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/20170808/baltimore-ravens-offensive-lineman-john-urschel-retires-abruptly

 

In a related story, Ravens OL John Urschel retired due to CTE study. He's the mathematician doing PhD in MIT on math.

 

 

In August 2015, he suffered a concussion when he went helmet-to-helmet with another player and was knocked unconscious.

"I think it hurt my ability to think well mathematically," Urschel said. "It took me about three weeks before I was football-ready. It took me a little bit longer before my high-level visualizations ability came back."

 

What he's going to find is, this impairment will come back later on. He is now more susceptible to even minor bodily jolts or shocks. His relative youth will negate the impact of this MTBI he suffered from football for now - he is still likely undergoing the last growth stage of the brain and that stage will help he not feel the impact of MTBI. And so, because of that he will think it is "cured"

 

But he will feel its impact in adulthood. His mental faculties will get impaired from time to time. He is going to find that there will be times he can't understand his own work. He will feel confused and betrayed. And unable to grasp what is happening because you literally have mental short-wiring.

 

I applaud him. This is John choosing the rest of his life - my guess is he still has 60-75 years more to live. Live well John.

Edited by CanadianFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/20170808/baltimore-ravens-offensive-lineman-john-urschel-retires-abruptly

 

In a related story, Ravens OL John Urschel retired due to CTE study. He's the mathematician doing PhD in MIT on math.

 

 

What he's going to find is, this impairment will come back later on. He is now more susceptible to even minor bodily jolts or shocks. His relative youth will negate the impact of this MTBI he suffered from football for now - he is still likely undergoing the last growth stage of the brain and that stage will help he not feel the impact of MTBI. And so, because of that he will think it is "cured"

 

But he will feel its impact in adulthood. His mental faculties will get impaired from time to time. He is going to find that there will be times he can't understand his own work. He will feel confused and betrayed. And unable to grasp what is happening because you literally have mental short-wiring.

 

I applaud him. This is John choosing the rest of his life - my guess is he still has 60-75 years more to live. Live well John.

To play devil's advocate it's an easier decision for a guy with a PhD to walk away. Football presents many other guys with the best and often times only options they have in life. I don't want to debate the merits of CTE as I am not a professional. There remains a lot to be learned about CTE.

 

My issue is the way in which the media has presented the problem. Condemning the sport of football isn't what should be happening. The focus should be on creating safer equipment. The sport of football has provided millions of young men with the best years of their life. A life that many could only dream of. There is a downside with this blessing as is the case with everything in life. That doesn't mean the sport of football should be torn down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To play devil's advocate it's an easier decision for a guy with a PhD to walk away. Football presents many other guys with the best and often times only options they have in life. I don't want to debate the merits of CTE as I am not a professional. There remains a lot to be learned about CTE.

 

My issue is the way in which the media has presented the problem. Condemning the sport of football isn't what should be happening. The focus should be on creating safer equipment. The sport of football has provided millions of young men with the best years of their life. A life that many could only dream of. There is a downside with this blessing as is the case with everything in life. That doesn't mean the sport of football should be torn down.

 

I agree re: Urschel. He needs to salvage the rest of his life. Mind you math doctors don't make 10% of the salary Mds make though. Or 5% of NFL.

 

I don't want to make a blanket statement on "media". I thought this article was fairly factual. Football isn't going to die, because paying customers want to see the violence. See the growth of MMA.

 

Risk in MMA is real. Risk in Football is real. They are just discovering other aspects of it and reporting it now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...