Jump to content

Today I Learned....PartII


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, DC Tom said:

Today I learned that one of the causes of the Mexican-American War of 1946 was the illegal immigration of Americans to the Mexican provinces of California and Texas.

 

Off topic: One of my favorite quotes came from Tommy Lasorda when asked about contract negotiations with Fernando Valenzuela: "He wants Texas back"

 

On topic: today I learned that I never pass up an opportunity to share my favorite quotes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, SinceThe70s said:

 

Off topic: One of my favorite quotes came from Tommy Lasorda when asked about contract negotiations with Fernando Valenzuela: "He wants Texas back"

 

On topic: today I learned that I never pass up an opportunity to share my favorite quotes.

 

One of my favorites is about Captian Bernard Kelly, after he put the USS Enterprise on a sandbar outside of San Francisco: "He grounds the warship he walks on."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

One of my favorites is about Captian Bernard Kelly, after he put the USS Enterprise on a sandbar outside of San Francisco: "He grounds the warship he walks on."

 

Have to admit I needed a double take on that one, but don't kill me when I repeat it a year or so from now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

One of my favorites is about Captian Bernard Kelly, after he put the USS Enterprise on a sandbar outside of San Francisco: "He grounds the warship he walks on."

I thought I was a clever with puns, but it took me a long time to figure that one out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2018 at 10:58 AM, DC Tom said:

Today I learned that one of the causes of the Mexican-American War of 1946 was the illegal immigration of Americans to the Mexican provinces of California and Texas.

I learned we had a war with Mexico after WWII (1946) and nobody told us about it .....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Limeaid said:

I learned we had a war with Mexico after WWII (1946) and nobody told us about it .....  

 

I'm typing with a stitched-up finger, and that was my only typo.  I'm actually impressed with myself...(which is tougher than it sounds, as I usually think I'm an idiot.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, DC Tom said:

 

I'm typing with a stitched-up finger, and that was my only typo.  I'm actually impressed with myself...(which is tougher than it sounds, as I usually think I'm an idiot.)

 

Did we win or lose war with Mexico?  Since Texas is part of US still I assume we lost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2018 at 2:23 PM, DC Tom said:

 

I'm typing with a stitched-up finger, and that was my only typo.  I'm actually impressed with myself...(which is tougher than it sounds, as I usually think I'm an idiot.)

Hope it’s just a flesh wound. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/1/2018 at 8:30 PM, DC Tom said:

 

One of my favorites is about Captian Bernard Kelly, after he put the USS Enterprise on a sandbar outside of San Francisco: "He grounds the warship he walks on."

 

That was Robert J. Kelly, in 1983.

One of the very few whose career survived such a thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Limeaid said:

Feds should work on balancing books by fining cannabis workers.

It’s a legal business.   

 

Maybe if they legalize it federally then  it can be sold and taxed on the open market just like beer and wine and alcohol.  

Edited by ShadyBillsFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

It’s a legal business.   

 

Maybe if they legalize it federally then  it can be sold and taxed on the open market just like beer and wine and alcohol.  

 

It is NOT legal; federal authorities choose not to prosecute which is not same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Limeaid said:

 

It is NOT legal; federal authorities choose not to prosecute which is not same thing.

It’s legal in DC, Cali, Colorado, to name a few. 

 

 

Thirty states and the District of Columbia currently have laws broadly legalizing marijuana in some form.

 

Eight states and the District of Columbia have adopted the most expansive laws legalizing marijuana for recreational use.

 

Most recently, sales of recreational-use marijuana in California kicked off on Jan. 1. In Massachusetts, retail sales of cannabis are expected to start later this year in July. 

 

Voters in Maine similarly approved a ballot measure legalizing marijuana in 2016.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Canadian Bills Fan said:

 

Not true.

Used to be true in the 80's.

I'm sure there are some airlines that might have it in place, but not the norm.

Pilots are presented food options and they usually rotate who gets to choose first, but the old rule has gone away quite awhile ago.

So now we've learned that today, instead.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

who need banks?  

 

 

they do, they aren't too comfortable holding on to $20,000,000 in paper and its growing

 

 

 

i've been on 12 warranted searches that found hollow point ammo to protect $10,000 in bills in a safe

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

they do, they aren't too comfortable holding on to $20,000,000 in paper and its growing

 

i've been on 12 warranted searches that found hollow point ammo to protect $10,000 in bills in a safe

 

 

If they report any transactions could they  not use off shore banks? 

 

 

I may still have some hollow point bullets for my .357  

 

( I hope you know I'm joking here a bit  - I said a bit) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ShadyBillsFan said:

 

If they report any transactions could they  not use off shore banks? 

 

 

I may still have some hollow point bullets for my .357  

 

( I hope you know I'm joking here a bit  - I said a bit) 

 

 

the problem is that pot is under fed law restiction so banks won't touch money from the proceeds

 

quite a conumdrum...

 

banks have stepped up in anti-money laundering efforts and procedures the last 15 or so years, to surprisingly high levels to me for some matters

 

i would have to believe that moving funds offshore is more restricted than within the US, as always i am fully open to being corrected there as I haven't performed the movement of funds but reviewed hundreds of thousands of transactions...

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

banks have stepped up in anti-money laundering efforts and procedures the last 15 or so years, to surprisingly high levels to me for some matters

 

 

Patriot Act has many provisions for reporting currency transactions at various levels, thus the scrutiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Patriot Act has many provisions for reporting currency transactions at various levels, thus the scrutiny.

 

that has helped as well

 

you cannot knowingly accept money that has been derived from criminal activity, and not knowing isn't an excuse any more

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, sherpa said:

 

Patriot Act has many provisions for reporting currency transactions at various levels, thus the scrutiny.

 

It’s not just dollar thresholds either. Anything suspicious has to be reported. If you come in and ask what the limit is, whatever you do should be reported. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

It’s not just dollar thresholds either. Anything suspicious has to be reported. If you come in and ask what the limit is, whatever you do should be reported. 

 

it would be hard and onerous to break down $2,000,000 liquid cash into small deposits without raising a suspicion

 

the paperwork is all done and the databases of transactions are massive but they aren't looked into until an initial charge or complaint is filed

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, row_33 said:

 

it would be hard and onerous to break down $2,000,000 liquid cash into small deposits without raising a suspicion

 

the paperwork is all done and the databases of transactions are massive but they aren't looked into until an initial charge or complaint is filed

 

 

I had a buddy/client who is a real estate attorney. His closing instructions called for “cash or certified funds”. Some mob guy shows up with a suitcase full of cash to buy a half million dollar house! He called the bank and said “HELP! I know it’s almost 5:00, but don’t close the vault!” He changed his closing instruction letter!

 

He was later put under some form of protection until he could be flown to Philadelphia to testify as to what happened. He said he was most uncomfortable walking out of court....when the protection was no longer there for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Augie said:

 

I had a buddy/client who is a real estate attorney. His closing instructions called for “cash or certified funds”. Some mob guy shows up with a suitcase full of cash to buy a half million dollar house! He called the bank and said “HELP! I know it’s almost 5:00, but don’t close the vault!” He changed his closing instruction letter!

 

He was later put under some form of protection until he could be flown to Philadelphia to testify as to what happened. He said he was most uncomfortable walking out of court....when the protection was no longer there for him. 

 

 

he couldn't invoke client privilege on a trust matter?

 

:D

 

organized crime is an obvious target of opprobrium, that sale of pot legal in a state but not at the fed level is another matter

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, row_33 said:

he couldn't invoke client privilege on a trust matter?

 

:D

 

organized crime is an obvious target of opprobrium, that sale of pot legal in a state but not at the fed level is another matter

 

Outstanding...word of the day! :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...