Jump to content

The Deep State War Heats Up :ph34r:


Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

Well, I don't think anyone should be shocked at this point. I'm guessing that one major reason the Queen fired him so fast was that they knew more 'friends' of Andrew were going to start getting busted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ummm methinks Dershowitz is never getting back on the cocktail circuit. 

 


More on the story:

</snip>
 

Q: But let me just ask you — you said that George Soros asked Barack Obama to have his Justice Department investigate somebody?
 

Dershowitz: We’re — that’s going to come out in a lawsuit in the near future. Yeah
 

Q: Wow, well, we look forward to hearing more about that new.
 

Dershowitz: That’s not unusual. That is not unusual. People whisper to presidents all the time. Presidents whisper to [the] Justice Department all the time. It’s very common. It’s wrong, whoever does it, but it’s common, and we shouldn’t think that it’s unique to any particular president. I have in my possession the actual 302 form [an FBI record of an interview], which documents this issue, and it will, at the right time, come out. But I’m not free to disclose it now because it’s a case that’s not yet been filed.

</snip>



 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Hedge said:

 

 

 

 

 

 

I have to say here that while Weinstein is a dirtbag of Hollywoodian proportions, no one involved in this walks out with their hands clean.  The defense team marketed the $$$$ out of this trial, the prosecution did the same, the victims have to balance accusations and what appears to be consenual activity, the seedy underbelly of the casting couch phenomenon is an issue, now you have a member of the jury reading and reviewing books dealing with predatory behavior.  What a cluster$#!$. 

 

I don't think he walks simply because, well, he sure looks the part of a predator, but I would not be surprised in the least if he did. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

The defense attorney should have known better than to publish her op-ed before deliberations.

Sometimes it's just best to shut your mouth and not draw any undue attention to yourself. Like a golf clap in an opposing stadium when your team does something good. Better yet just do a Tony Podesta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

The defense attorney should have known better than to publish her op-ed before deliberations.

In theory, Koko for Cocoa Puffs, is the jury supposed to avoid media/TV etc?  (I'm referring of course to the writ of Habeas Corpus vis a vis Notice of Appeal and Declaratory Injunctions.  Per se and to wit.) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

In theory, Koko for Cocoa Puffs, is the jury supposed to avoid media/TV etc?  (I'm referring of course to the writ of Habeas Corpus vis a vis Notice of Appeal and Declaratory Injunctions.  Per se and to wit.) 

 

They are, but are they?

 

The defense attorney was grandstanding to get her name out there (to drum up more business) while the topic was relevant.

 

Oh, and force majeure, mother *****.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:

In theory, Koko for Cocoa Puffs, is the jury supposed to avoid media/TV etc?  (I'm referring of course to the writ of Habeas Corpus vis a vis Notice of Appeal and Declaratory Injunctions.  Per se and to wit.) 

You missed your calling:

 

 

  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/17/2020 at 9:30 AM, Buffalo_Gal said:

Ummm methinks Dershowitz is never getting back on the cocktail circuit. 

 

We can make a Brandon Beane deal: Give the right Dershowitz and the left can have Max Boot, Jennifer Rubin, Mitt Romney, and a NeverTrumper to be named later.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sidney Powell's latest filing.  She says how helpful the IG report was helpful to understand what happened. ... it  is  clear  every  FBI  official  who  targeted  Mr.  Flynn  is  under  investigation—

</snip>

The government’s response admits astounding and widespread government misconduct as detailed in the IG Report regarding the Crossfire Hurricaneinvestigation and FISA applications, yet Mr. Van Grack refuses to admit any impact on Mr. Flynn’s case.  For these reasons and those in  Mr.  Flynn’s  Motion  to  Dismiss  and  other  briefs,  the  government’s  outrageous  misconduct mandates dismissal of this prosecution with prejudice.  Its opposition proves no interest in justice, defies credulity, and demonstrates the government’s reprehensible and unrepentant attitude toward the most serious of all issues that affectdueprocess and the administration of justice.

</snip>

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On February 17, 2020 at 12:30 PM, Buffalo_Gal said:

Ummm methinks Dershowitz is never getting back on the cocktail circuit. 

 


More on the story:

</snip>
 

Q: But let me just ask you — you said that George Soros asked Barack Obama to have his Justice Department investigate somebody?
 

Dershowitz: We’re — that’s going to come out in a lawsuit in the near future. Yeah
 

Q: Wow, well, we look forward to hearing more about that new.
 

Dershowitz: That’s not unusual. That is not unusual. People whisper to presidents all the time. Presidents whisper to [the] Justice Department all the time. It’s very common. It’s wrong, whoever does it, but it’s common, and we shouldn’t think that it’s unique to any particular president. I have in my possession the actual 302 form [an FBI record of an interview], which documents this issue, and it will, at the right time, come out. But I’m not free to disclose it now because it’s a case that’s not yet been filed.

</snip>



 

Oh look, another phony who is going to so something someday.  WTF?  These people are worse than the decoder ring from a Christmas Story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Koko78 said:

 

Worst. LGBTQHACLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ. Hater. Ever.

 

I mentioned this achievement to people today in a meeting with a few LGBTQ supporters (BIG supporters), they told me Richard doesn't count as gay because he's conservative. 

 

.

.

.

.

.

 

They were 100% serious. 

 

I just laughed. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I mentioned this achievement to people today in a meeting with a few LGBTQ supporters (BIG supporters), they told me Richard doesn't count as gay because he's conservative. 

 

.

.

.

.

.

 

They were 100% serious. 

 

I just laughed. 

 

SMH.

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

I mentioned this achievement to people today in a meeting with a few LGBTQ supporters (BIG supporters), they told me Richard doesn't count as gay because he's conservative. 

 

.

.

.

.

.

 

They were 100% serious. 

 

I just laughed. 

Quote

 

Those movements are always commie first, race religion, orientation, whatever second.  And many within it don't even see it.  It is ALWAYS solution:

Communize

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...