Jump to content

Jairus Byrd Benched in New Orleans


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Rob Ryan isn't in NO this season. How do you explain the fact that the Saints' D remains putrid?

They are ranked 26, which is up from 31 last year. They also give up 40 less yards per game this year as well.

What happened to Byrd?

 

He was a good player here. At least I thought so!

Injuries. Plus, I actually think Jauron was great with Defensive back. He moved Byrd from corner to S and George Wilson from receiver to S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing downfall.

 

He was such a ballhawk. Loved watching him play on the Bills.

 

So many of his interceptions seemed more luck than skill. For example, he'd be out of position but the ball would get tipped to him.

 

I was never a huge Byrd fan - unless we're talking about Butch Byrd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Rob Ryan isn't in NO this season. How do you explain the fact that the Saints' D remains putrid?

rampant injuries in the secondary is at least part of it. at one point byrd was literally the only starter in the secondary left standing and they were starting street free agents around him.

 

for stretches the unit has played very well but been very inconsistent.

They are ranked 26, which is up from 31 last year. They also give up 40 less yards per game this year as well.

 

 

also true - and thats despite having what i think was a rougher go of it with injuries year over year and being extremely limited by dead money in adding talent to the unit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So what you are saying is that a guy Whaley wanted to keep, who left for more money, and is now being benched is somehow an example of Whaley's drafting and team building prowess? :huh:

Elway drafted and wanted t keep Brock Osweiler at $16M a year. People keep saying what a genius he is for letting him walk. You have a number with a player and you hold firm even if it isn't a popular decision. That's something that GMs deserve credit for if they turn out to be right even if they got a little lucky. I think that's what Augie is trying to say.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

J Byrd was a ball hawk.....but, as a cover goy, he wan't much at all. And, he was slow...slower than the lb's the bills had during his time here. Whaley did a good job not overpaying for Byrd. thank god the he didn't take the Bills (still) substantial offer...yes, he got more money.......Whaley really gave the Saints a torpedo below the water line on this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me Byrd was fulfilling his dad's dreams and expectations more than his own. He was a ball hawk but was poor in tackling and run support. Never played with the passion of someone with something to prove.

 

I must watch the games wrong. I thought he was an excellent tackler by I think it was his third year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I must watch the games wrong. I thought he was an excellent tackler by I think it was his third year.

 

That is how I remember it as well......solid tackler. People talked about him being slow but often found himself in the right place.

 

We are gonna need depth next year....anyone want him back at a greatly reduced price?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Levitre?

He's another one.

 

I was skewered here for having the temerity to call him a half guard. He was technically sound, but too often got his ass handed to him at the LOS. And that was further exposed after he elected to sign elsewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's another one.

 

I was skewered here for having the temerity to call him a half guard. He was technically sound, but too often got his ass handed to him at the LOS. And that was further exposed after he elected to sign elsewhere.

He is playing really well in Atlanta I think they run a ZBS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is playing really well in Atlanta I think they run a ZBS.

That's true. Perhaps I should cut him some slack. His technical proficiency lends itself well to a zone scheme as he demonstrated here at times. But there are times you have to match power to power and he loses too frequently and thus wasn't worth what he was looking for here, imo. A decent player, but not close to a star player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true. Perhaps I should cut him some slack. His technical proficiency lends itself well to a zone scheme as he demonstrated here at times. But there are times you have to match power to power and he loses too frequently and thus wasn't worth what he was looking for here, imo. A decent player, but not close to a star player.

I know he is a T rex....but I think he could play RT better then Jordan Mills

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know he is a T rex....but I think he could play RT better then Jordan Mills

Haha. Levitre may be versatile in that he can play all the positions in a pinch, the couple times he was asked to pinch in due to injuries here were a disaster, whether it was at T or C.

 

I would add that in addition to returning to a zone scheme, the biggest improvement in Levitre's game is a result of playing between Matthews and Mack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I must watch the games wrong. I thought he was an excellent tackler by I think it was his third year.

 

You were watching correctly. He really developed into a tremendous open field tackler. He had a couple All Pro caliber seasons with us. We definitely got his best years out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...