Jump to content

Liberal Protests


B-Man

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Doc said:

 

Then who do you support?  And do not tell me AOC.

 

 

There are about a dozen black kids from Hartford who are bused into our (excellent) public school.  The vast majority don't care to be there and learn. 

To further the point, 1st generation immigrants in the same city school districts have had success. Kids that come from very different parts of the world and have language barriers. 

  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Penfield45 said:

 

first of all, defending police does not mean they go away, how do you not understand this?

 

i means not giving them billions of dollars to spend when they absolutely have no use for that money, and we need to pay them less. put that money towards education and infrastructure in towns/cities. your precious cops aren't going anywhere calm the f down  

First of all, defunding Planned Parenthood does not mean they go away. How do you not understand this?

 

It means not giving them billions of dollars to spend when they have absolutely no use for that money (since a lot of it gets donated back to Democrat candidate races), and we need to pay them less. Put that money towards education and infrastructure in towns/cities. Your precious facilities aren't going anywhere, calm the F down.

 

How does that sit?

  • Like (+1) 4
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

Shifting some funding isn’t that bad of an idea...

 

It's not. But too bad that's not the message they're choosing to spread. And if you suggest something reasonable, you get shouted down by the mob. 

 

They can't help but be dishonest -- they being the power behind these movements. Because it's not about the "cause", it's about regaining power for themselves at the expense of the people they're claiming to care about helping. Why else would they be pushing Joe Biden as their candidate considering his lengthy, and disgusting record on this very subject?

 

People are seeing through it in droves. This has backfired bigly on the political left. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Crayola64 said:

Shifting some funding isn’t that bad of an idea...

No not a bad idea and should be explored. The problem is that the term "defunding police" is an absurd way to describe that. On top of that you actually have morons trying to convince people we should have no police.

 

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Deranged Rhino said:

 

It's not. But too bad that's not the message they're choosing to spread. And if you suggest something reasonable, you get shouted down by the mob. 

 

They can't help but be dishonest -- they being the power behind these movements. Because it's not about the "cause", it's about regaining power for themselves at the expense of the people they're claiming to care about helping. Why else would they be pushing Joe Biden as their candidate considering his lengthy, and disgusting record on this very subject?

 

 

...cannot be better stated......I prefer "claim to care about manipulating" better......."we are your friend...we feel your pain......we're here to help....."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Beast said:

Who would have thought the Liberal mayor of Minneapolis would have more balls than Drew Brees does?

 

 

...LMAO....the kind, caring and thoughtful Mayor that handed out masks to rioters in the spirit of Covid-19 protectionism.......guaranteed landslide re-election....the "land of 10,000 fakes"..............

Edited by OldTimeAFLGuy
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Penfield45 said:

 

what the actual ***** is wrong with you. like honestly how dumb can you people get????

 

so you are against better education for your children/grandchildren? the american education system is totally broken, but yes lets keep funding police millions on millions for what exactly? Why do you want police to be so over funded? you have not answered this question yet and I'm waiting. 

You people? What is that supposed to mean?

 

”Hey, the cops are poorly trained and poorly hired. I have a good idea, let’s give them less money to train and hire more qualified people with, and then pay them less! That seems like it will work, right?”

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Haha (+1) 4
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sig1Hunter said:

You people? What is that supposed to mean?

 

”Hey, the cops are poorly trained and poorly hired. I have a good idea, let’s give them less money to train and hire more qualified people with, and then pay them less! That seems like it will work, right?”

 

"Let's take away their guns as well."

 

Yeah, I can see people signing up for that in droves.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

The NYPD's budget is $6 billon per year. Could they do their job with $5 billion per year? Probably. 

 

Again, reasonable. 

 

But that's not the rallying cry. And try explaining that position to the mob like the Boy Mayor did. What this shows is the dramatic split in the partisan left. There's no room for "reasonable" discussion and solutions when the anger is this high. Which makes it all the more insane that the media has enabled that anger without thinking it through. That split will be exacerbated as we approach November. Especially considering that they're running Biden -- they guy who authored the crime bill and spent forty years in office creating the very system their railing against. 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Sig1Hunter said:

You people? What is that supposed to mean?

 

”Hey, the cops are poorly trained and poorly hired. I have a good idea, let’s give them less money to train and hire more qualified people with, and then pay them less! That seems like it will work, right?”

 

 

 

 

...THE phrase that I absolutely loathe.......caustic, indignant, arrogant and as demeaning as one can get as if spoken from a position of superiority.....just effin' hate it.....

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

The NYPD's budget is $6 billon per year. Could they do their job with $5 billion per year? Probably. 


I'm sure they are going to use this police budget reduction to cut out pork, overlapping programs, and use a laser focus on what is good for policing the communities! <_<

?  hahahahahaa I crack myself up sometimes.

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Haha (+1) 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sig1Hunter said:

Is the title of this video “Play Stupid Games, Win Stupid Prizes”?

 

You when mean acting on the 1st Amendment right to peaceably protest and assemble in accordance with any laws, curfews, and regulations regarding them still gets you beaten unnecessarily? 

 

If that is considered a "Stupid Game" then I suppose so.  There are people out there breaking the law, but there are also protesters and press who are obliging everything they are being told to do and are still receiving heavy handed acts of violence.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

You when mean acting on the 1st Amendment right to peaceably protest and assemble in accordance with any laws, curfews, and regulations regarding them still gets you beaten unnecessarily? 

 

If that is considered a "Stupid Game" then I suppose so.  There are people out there breaking the law, but there are also protesters and press who are obliging everything they are being told to do and are still receiving heavy handed acts of violence.  

 

6 dead cops in a week might have something to do with tempers running hot.

 

 

*************************************

 

 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Link?

 

It's in the video I linked.  There are several examples of tire slashings and at least 2 examples of private property destruction (smashing windows of empty, parked cars and smashing what appeared to be a door).  

 

The video of the police (I think NYPD) destroying their own cruiser wasn't in that montage, but if I come across it again I'll post it right away.  Cops were even spray painting graffiti on the cruiser to make it look like the act of a rioter.  It was nuts.  

2 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


I think the one where you pointed out the cop had to finish kicking out his broken front window so he could drive away?

 

You're right, I just found this article about it.  It was Boston, not NY.  Thank you.  

 

https://newsmeter.in/fact-check-did-boston-police-damage-their-own-car-to-blame-on-george-floyd-protesters/

Edited by Capco
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

You when mean acting on the 1st Amendment right to peaceably protest and assemble in accordance with any laws, curfews, and regulations regarding them still gets you beaten unnecessarily? 

 

If that is considered a "Stupid Game" then I suppose so.  There are people out there breaking the law, but there are also protesters and press who are obliging everything they are being told to do and are still receiving heavy handed acts of violence.  

No, I meant you are playing a stupid game by linking a video intended to inflame tensions by showing brief scenes of police using force on people without any context or explanation of what is occurring. Your stupid prize will be revealed later.

  • Like (+1) 3
  • Haha (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Capco said:

 

You're right, I just found this article about it.  It was Boston, not NY.  Thank you.  

 

https://newsmeter.in/fact-check-did-boston-police-damage-their-own-car-to-blame-on-george-floyd-protesters/


So, "and even destroying their own cruisers in some cases?" is completely disingenuous.

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Capco said:

You're right, I just found this article about it.  It was Boston, not NY.  Thank you.  

 

https://newsmeter.in/fact-check-did-boston-police-damage-their-own-car-to-blame-on-george-floyd-protesters/

 

We covered that when it happened. It's not them destroying the car, the car was destroyed and they needed to clear the windshield to drive away. 

 

Funny how context changes things... 

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sig1Hunter said:

No, I meant you are playing a stupid game by linking a video intended to inflame tensions by showing brief scenes of police using force on people without any context or explanation of what is occurring. Your stupid prize will be revealed later.

 

Oh really?  Since you know so much about my intentions, tell me, what do I intend to have for dinner tonight? 

 

Pointing out a scene where a woman respectfully asks "what's going to happen at 8, sir?" only to hear the response "what's gonna happen is we're gonna start beating the ***** out of you" isn't worthy of note?  (that's the final clip in the montage, last 15 seconds if you want to quickly verify it).  

 

@Deranged Rhino Correct, there's a lot at play here.  Emotions are high on all sides.  That means mistakes are bound to happen.  That doesn't mean we should excuse the mistakes entirely though.  For the most part the officers around are doing a good job I think.  The protesting in my area has all been peaceful, and cops have joined in on several occasions.  

 

Still, any cops (and protesters) not following protocol should be reprimanded accordingly.  I think that's only fair.  

 

4 minutes ago, Buffalo_Gal said:


So, "and even destroying their own cruisers in some cases?" is completely disingenuous.

 

I stand corrected ma'am.  As I said, I appreciate you clarifying the matter for me.  

 

It still doesn't explain the tire slashings and window smashings, etc.  

 

And when I asked about these things, I wasn't trying to be facetious.  Just because I disagree with many posters here politically doesn't mean there isn't value to be had at times.  Like just now.  

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Deranged Rhino said:

 

Again, reasonable. 

 

But that's not the rallying cry. And try explaining that position to the mob like the Boy Mayor did. What this shows is the dramatic split in the partisan left. There's no room for "reasonable" discussion and solutions when the anger is this high. Which makes it all the more insane that the media has enabled that anger without thinking it through. That split will be exacerbated as we approach November. Especially considering that they're running Biden -- they guy who authored the crime bill and spent forty years in office creating the very system their railing against. 

The mayor of Minneapolis ***** his pants in that moment. He also interpreted the request to defund as a request to abolish. 

 

He could have said he would commit to reinvest a portion of the police budget into the black community, and offer to sit down with the community to listen to their funding priorities... 

 

As far as Sleepy Joe, I had zero excitement or faith in his candidacy. Don't get me started...

 

After the past week, I think most Americans would prefer Biden take a nap in the Oval Office for the next four years.  I'd vote for Mr. Potato Head at this point.

 

How's this -- Sleepy Joe, because America needs a nap... Sleepy Joe-- because we're ***** exhausted...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

The mayor of Minneapolis ***** his pants in that moment. He also interpreted the request to defund as a request to abolish. 

 

He did, no argument. But he didn't misinterpret that. It was stated directly by the woman who asked the question: "we don't want no more police". 

 

Again, arguing (not you, the general you) that the word "defund" doesn't mean what it actually means is a very disingenuous position. Doubly so when half the crowd screaming it means EXACTLY that. It's a confusing message that's splitting the party rather than uniting it. 

 

4 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

He could have said he would commit to reinvest a portion of the police budget into the black community, and offer to sit down with the community to listen to their funding priorities... 

 

That wouldn't have been enough in that moment. The crowd wanted him to say no more police. Full stop. That's what a contingent of this group wants to achieve. And when you suggest a rational solution, they will not hear it. 

 

Which boxes centrist democrats into a no win position entirely of their own making. 

 

4 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

As far as Sleepy Joe, I had zero excitement or faith in his candidacy. Don't get me started...

 

After the past week, I think most Americans would prefer Biden take a nap in the Oval Office for the next four years.  I'd vote for Mr. Potato Head at this point.

 

How's this -- Sleepy Joe, because America needs a nap... Sleepy Joe-- because we're ***** exhausted...

 

:lol: :beer: 

 

The thing is, this was completely predictable in terms of No Chance Joe. Yet he was forced on the party by its elites regardless of his shortcomings. 

 

You should really ask yourself why that choice was made. 

Edited by Deranged Rhino
  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Motorin' said:

The mayor of Minneapolis ***** his pants in that moment. He also interpreted the request to defund as a request to abolish. 

 

He could have said he would commit to reinvest a portion of the police budget into the black community, and offer to sit down with the community to listen to their funding priorities... 

 

Fwiw, the organizer who asked the mayor this question said "we don't want any police in our city" or something to that effect just a couple seconds before he answered.  

  • Like (+1) 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...