Never NEVER Give-up Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Not a bad slot receiver. Always seems to get open. Smaller like Edelman & Welker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I'm not unhappy with 1 Watkins 2 wood 3 Kerley 4 Harvin 5 Goodwin 6 ??? 7 profit Harvin as an off the bench player in this system for 3 or 4 snaps a game max... should any of them go down Kerley can step up. Harvin becomes 3rd... Its not terrible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitewalkerInPhilly Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I'm fine with Kerley filling Hogan's spot for say $2M. He is a comparable player. That needs to be the 4th WR spot though. The Bills still need a #2 IMO. That's where I am. As long as we also get someone who can stretch the field it would be a decent replacement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 Hogan-> good: gunner, routes, blocker. Not so much; RAC, open field Kerkey-> good: PR, open field, double moves. Not so much; blocking, routes This guy is Harvin Lite... Completely different player than Hogan. It's like comparing Anquan Bolden to Mike Wallace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 (edited) Hogan-> good: gunner, routes, blocker. Not so much; RAC, open field Kerkey-> good: PR, open field, double moves. Not so much; blocking, routes This guy is Harvin Lite... Completely different player than Hogan. It's like comparing Anquan Bolden to Mike Wallace i think people are comparing them for two reasons: he is visiting to maybe fill the roster spot voided by Hogan (so he's more or less his replacement though maybe not used similarly), and they can both play in the slot. Not necessarily that they are the same style of WR. Could be wrong but that's how I see it. Edited March 16, 2016 by YoloinOhio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorkington Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I'm not unhappy with 1 Watkins 2 wood 3 Kerley 4 Harvin 5 Goodwin 6 ??? 7 profit Harvin as an off the bench player in this system for 3 or 4 snaps a game max... should any of them go down Kerley can step up. Harvin becomes 3rd... Its not terrible I can't see any situation where we have Harvin and Goodwin on the team this year. I imagine they'd pick one or the other, and maybe neither if we go with Kerley. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Over 29 years of fanhood Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 i think people are comparing them for two reasons: he is visiting to maybe fill the roster spot voided by Hogan (so he's more or less his replacement though maybe not used similarly), and they can both play in the slot. Not necessarily that they are the same style of WR. Could be wrong but that's how I see it. sure I see why one might want to compare, just trying to argue against the comparison as they are both good and bad at different things which bear importance only against the relative make up of the roster, particularly this far into the depth chart. Statistically they have produced similarly over the last 3 seasons. Actually if you could meld the best they both have to offer, you'd have a solid #2 WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big C Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I can't see any situation where we have Harvin and Goodwin on the team this year. I imagine they'd pick one or the other, and maybe neither if we go with Kerley. Agreed, for the injury problems alone. Harvin is the better player, but Goodwin is cheaper. I would think if we grab Kerley we lose both and possibly bring back Deonte, who looked like a stud in camp. They also seem pretty high on Salas but I don't quite know what his role would be at this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paup 1995MVP Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I'm not unhappy with 1 Watkins 2 wood 3 Kerley 4 Harvin 5 Goodwin 6 ??? 7 profit Harvin as an off the bench player in this system for 3 or 4 snaps a game max... should any of them go down Kerley can step up. Harvin becomes 3rd... Its not terrible You can't have this group of receivers. Sammy is the only one over 6 feet tall, and he is all of 6'1. We need some size at the position. That's why we brought in Salas, Little and Boykin. We are not keeping Goodwin, Kerley and Harvin. I say we sign Kerley. Goodwin and Harvin are perpetually injured. It is fine to have one small quick slot receiver. And Curley would fit that role well. Better than Hogan in my estimation. But the NFL is a big man's passing game for the most part. And we need some size at WR if we want to improve our passing game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 This guy is 12,000 times better than hogan fwiw. He even takes Leo and Gilmore to school a few times FF to 1 min 40 sec and enjoy the Kerley show, YAC CITY!!! Gotta click link to watch on YouTube I know it is a Highlight film. but gosh he sure looks better than Hogan ever did. give him that 2Mil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdand12 Posted March 16, 2016 Share Posted March 16, 2016 I'd keep Goodwin around just because of his speed to be able to stretch the field....Outside of Watkins, we don't have any other receiver who can do this. Unfortunately, Goodwin is more focused on his Olympic career. Whats the cap hit on Flash getting cut this year? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 You can't have this group of receivers. Sammy is the only one over 6 feet tall, and he is all of 6'1. We need some size at the position. That's why we brought in Salas, Little and Boykin. We are not keeping Goodwin, Kerley and Harvin. I say we sign Kerley. Goodwin and Harvin are perpetually injured. It is fine to have one small quick slot receiver. And Curley would fit that role well. Better than Hogan in my estimation. But the NFL is a big man's passing game for the most part. And we need some size at WR if we want to improve our passing game. Taylor throws low Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wayne Cubed Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Adam Caplan @caplannfl #Lions and former #Jets WR Jeremy Kerley have agreed to terms on a contract, per source. Not signing with the Bills then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
papazoid Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Adam Caplan @caplannfl #Lions and former #Jets WR Jeremy Kerley have agreed to terms on a contract, per source. Not signing with the Bills then. dang, thought he'd be worth $1 mil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Nails Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 It's Harvin or bust now. We'll almost definitely go WR with one of our top 3 picks too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 It's Harvin or bust now. We'll almost definitely go WR with one of our top 3 picks too. Agreed WR is a big need. I wouldn't be that surprised if they took one in the 1st. With the depth of the DL they are still going to be able to get a starting caliber player in the 2nd and potentially 3rd. I think that they take 2 guys in the front 7 and a WR with the 1st 3 picks. The order though may be different than I initially thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Agreed WR is a big need. I wouldn't be that surprised if they took one in the 1st. With the depth of the DL they are still going to be able to get a starting caliber player in the 2nd and potentially 3rd. I think that they take 2 guys in the front 7 and a WR with the 1st 3 picks. The order though may be different than I initially thought. I'm really hoping that they wait on WR--I'm not huge on any of the early guys, but I think there's terrific value to be had in the middle rounds in guys like Keyarris Garrett, Geronimo Allison, Robby Anderson, Kenny Lawler, and Malcolm Mitchell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 (edited) I'm really hoping that they wait on WR--I'm not huge on any of the early guys, but I think there's terrific value to be had in the middle rounds in guys like Keyarris Garrett, Geronimo Allison, Robby Anderson, Kenny Lawler, and Malcolm Mitchell. I wouldn't be shocked if they took 2 WR. It depends on how they feel about those bottom of the depth chart guys. Maybe someone in the 1st 3 rounds and then another in the 6th or something like that? Edited March 21, 2016 by Kirby Jackson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebandit27 Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 I wouldn't be shocked if they took 2 WR. It depends on how they feel about those bottom of the depth chart guys. Yeah--I struggle between feeling like they're comfortable with the Salas/Boykin types in the 3/4 roles vs. the thinking that they need another dynamic threat. I tend to fall in the latter category, but the only guy that I really like near the top for what Roman's offense likes to do is Sterling Shepard, and I think he's probably a 35-40 guy in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted March 21, 2016 Share Posted March 21, 2016 Damn, another FA using us for leverage.... Kim is cheap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts