Jump to content

Clinton Political Dynasty


Recommended Posts

Because...

 

not trump.

 

No self-respecting Democrat could really have WANTED Hillary Clinton as a candidate.

PJ desperately wanted her to win going back to 2008 at minimum. Never understood the devotion to her, but it is legit from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The most embarrassing thing about this CBS News puff piece isn't that it proclaims that "Hillary Clinton lets her 'guard down'" based on nothing more than that...

If CBS News cared about factual reporting, it would say "Hillary Clinton Claims She Is "Letting [Her] Guard Down' in Her New Memoir." Most of us won't believe that, and CBS must know that, so why would it ludicrously tout the book as if someone at CBS had read the book and found it revealing and forthcoming?
Thank you Lord.
Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The most embarrassing thing about this CBS News puff piece isn't that it proclaims that "Hillary Clinton lets her 'guard down'" based on nothing more than that...

If CBS News cared about factual reporting, it would say "Hillary Clinton Claims She Is "Letting [Her] Guard Down' in Her New Memoir." Most of us won't believe that, and CBS must know that, so why would it ludicrously tout the book as if someone at CBS had read the book and found it revealing and forthcoming?
Thank you Lord.

 

uh, doofus.

 

they "quoted" her so that means they are just simply quoting her. not claiming she let her guard down. they simply attempt to justify her claim. but, well done you. well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh, doofus.

 

they "quoted" her so that means they are just simply quoting her. not claiming she let her guard down. they simply attempt to justify her claim. but, well done you. well done.

 

 

 

Looks like Boyst is having a little comprehension problem...........well, it is getting late.

 

You could either read it all , or you could respond with your usual bluster and call me names and threaten me........... :lol:

 

 

You look silly either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Looks like Boyst is having a little comprehension problem...........well, it is getting late.

 

You could either read it all , or you could respond with your usual bluster and call me names and threaten me........... :lol:

 

 

You look silly either way.

i don't threaten people. that's not cool to do.

 

i am just calling the article a bit silly when it actually quotes the source and attempts to build a story around it. this happens all the time and while its not good, its a bit silly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The country would would have been much better off if she won and this embarrassing clown show we have now was not taking place.

Not really. We need real change in how our congress works together towards real legislation and how our government functions. The clown show is our best chance of that rather than the corrupt political whore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really. We need real change in how our congress works together towards real legislation and how our government functions. The clown show is our best chance of that rather than the corrupt political whore.

Yes really, Trump is a joke, corrupt and an idiot. Clinton is way better. She is intelligent. That kind of helps when making decisions

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes really, Trump is a joke, corrupt and an idiot. Clinton is way better. She is intelligent. That kind of helps when making decisions

 

They're both paranoid narcissists with delusions of godhood.

 

The big difference is that people actually indulge and enable Clinton's delusions. She's only a "better" president if you're a fascist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're both paranoid narcissists with delusions of godhood.

 

The big difference is that people actually indulge and enable Clinton's delusions. She's only a "better" president if you're a fascist.

 

No, Hillary was obviously the better choice, you are just WAY to partisan to see the obvious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, Hillary was obviously the better choice, you are just WAY to partisan to see the obvious

If your measure of 'better' is 'which one makes fewer embarrassing social media posts', than yes, she was.

 

But that doesn't change the fact she is every bit as narcissistic and delusional about her own self worth as Trump. And she is far -- like by a factor of ten - more corrupt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your measure of 'better' is 'which one makes fewer embarrassing social media posts', than yes, she was.

 

But that doesn't change the fact she is every bit as narcissistic and delusional about her own self worth as Trump. And she is far -- like by a factor of ten - more corrupt.

 

And she is far - like by a factor of fifty - more enabled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your measure of 'better' is 'which one makes fewer embarrassing social media posts', than yes, she was.

But that doesn't change the fact she is every bit as narcissistic and delusional about her own self worth as Trump. And she is far -- like by a factor of ten - more corrupt.

Trump wants to pass a health care law just because, having no clue what's in it or what it does. To say he is winnng! Clinton is competent, something that is important.

 

And more corrupt that running our foreign policy based on his business interests? Your ignorance is the only thing making Trump look better than Hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...