Jump to content

Refugee Crisis in the U. S. (?)


B-Man

Recommended Posts

 

Isn’t it obvious?

Yes! It’s so clear! We should import more weird, backward, dull-witted, useless, and inassimilable civilizational disasters, many of which have produced nothing more technologically challenging than the pointed stick. What could be a better idea?

 

 

 

With Brexit and now Trump threatening the globalist centralized power scam the shrews are squirming and blathering on more often now.

 

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-13/lagarde-says-globalization-s-benefits-need-to-be-shared-by-all

Edited by Dante
Link to comment
Share on other sites

DHS accused of sitting on damning border report as immigration issue drives presidential race

by Malia Zimmerman

 

Original Article

 

 

Federal lawmakers seeking to pinpoint the number of illegal immigrants who successfully sneak across the southern border ordered up a report from the Department of Homeland Security, but the agency refuses to release it and instead cites a misleading statistic that overstates the number who are nabbed, sources told Fox News.

 

DHS denied it is holding back the report, but sources say it was completed in November and that it shows roughly half of adults who attempt to cross the border make it - approximately 250,000 in total.

 

But that number is at odds with DHS’ official estimates. The agency claims authorities catch 80 percent of adults trying to sneak in, but critics say the figure is padded to make it appear border security is more effective than it really is.

 

More at the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

About 1 in 3 refugees in Europe don't believe in secular laws.

 

Let's import more of them, what can go wrong?

 

The constitution is totally compatible with sharia, no problem.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/just-under-30-percent-french-muslims-reject-secular-115105963.html

Edited by drinkTHEkoolaid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

About 1 in 3 refugees in Europe don't believe in secular laws.

 

Let's import more of them, what can go wrong?

 

The constitution is totally compatible with sharia, no problem.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/just-under-30-percent-french-muslims-reject-secular-115105963.html

 

A bit misleading.

 

The question is whether Sharia law is more important to them. Try asking some Americans whether the Bible is more important than the Constitution; and you'll probably get the same results.

 

What really matters is which interpretation the refugees follow, because it isn't about the ideology, but the fanaticism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former Nazi corroborator creep Soro's all in on bringing down the west. I love the pic of some chick unloading a kid when 70% of the refugees are men. Fake

 

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/20/george-soros-to-invest-500-million-in-help-for-refugees-through-his-open-society-foundations.html

 

And king dipstick weighs in on the nation state.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/09/20/obama-praises-globalism-while-acknowledging-its-faults/

 

And his NYC regional operative weighs in. Full court press going on.

 

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/nyc-mayor-refugee-terror-vanishingly-rare/

 

 

 

Are they stepping this shite up because they are afraid about November?

And his NYC regional operative weighs in. Full court press going on.

Edited by Dante
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If just one of those Refugees ends up committing an act of terror, the GOP will win the following elections whether it be midterm or presidential race in a landslide.

 

That is an awfully big risk they take.

 

You're right. It's not very bright of them, since I believe the vast majority of Americans would completely support bringing Syrian refugees here if the Democrats publicly embraced thorough vetting of each individual. It's disingenuous of them to call people racists for being critical of their bringing so many here so quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right. It's not very bright of them, since I believe the vast majority of Americans would completely support bringing Syrian refugees here if the Democrats publicly embraced thorough vetting of each individual. It's disingenuous of them to call people racists for being critical of their bringing so many here so quickly.

Its racist and fascist to bring so many here so quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Breaking: Supreme Court denies Obama rehearing on US v Texas immigration fight

 

The White House lost on its fight over Barack Obama’s executive orders on immigration when the Supreme Court had nine members, and it won’t get a second chance with the eight remaining.

 

On its first day back in session, the high court denied a rehearing request in US et al v Texas et al, the biggest fight between Washington and the states on enforcement of immigration statutes (via SCOTUSblog):

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Illegal Immigrants Flood Across Border Before Trump Takes Office

 

Human smugglers using Trump’s wall as a selling point[/size]

illegals-being-smuggled-across-border.pn this combined with the rumkrs he will legalize all residents and illegals... Big selling point.

 

 

 

UNEXPECTEDLY: Trump set to take sharp right turn on immigration.

 

 

Obama Halts Amnesty Push in Court...

 

 

Border Patrol Welcomes Wall...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
The Surge of Migrants at the Border Never Stopped

Remember the surge of often-unaccompanied children that came across America’s southern border in the summer of 2014?

 

More than 52,000 unaccompanied children were caught trying to cross the southern U.S. border in the first five months of this year. Between 60,000 to 90,000 such children are expected to have crossed by the end of 2014, and more than 140,000 are expected next year, according to the White House. That’s more than double the 24,668 that flowed across last year and triple the 13,625 children that came in 2012.

 

 

Because of the national media’s intermittent-at-best interest in our southern border, it was easy to think the problem had died down or dwindled a bit. Apparently, the numbers never really went down for long.
The surge of Central American families seeking asylum at U.S. borders is not letting up, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Gil Kerlikowske said Wednesday after touring a temporary holding facility in the Rio Grande Valley set up to manage the influx.
The number of apprehensions along the southwestern border can be close to 2,000 a day — with most people turning themselves in, Kerlikowske said in a phone interview. The November influx was as high as what was seen in October: 46,195, he said.
The precise monthly number is to be announced next week.

 

 

Now, the 2014 figures were for children, and the recent figures were for all ages, but you get the picture. Migrants kept coming – often driven by the rumor that the United States government was providing “permisos” to those who made the journey. The Department of Homeland Security ran an op-ed in Spanish-language outlets in 2014 declaring that there are no “permisos” for unattended children. The announcement apparently had little to no effect.
Hundreds of immigrant families caught illegally crossing the Mexican border between July and September told U.S. immigration agents they made the dangerous trip in part because they believed they would be permitted to stay in the United States and collect public benefits.

 

 

So now the U.S. government, at considerable taxpayer expense, is constructing new facilities to process and care for these people coming across the border. It is the compassionate thing to do – but it is also not fair to expect America to underwrite the costs of caring for and educating the impoverished of Central American countries.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The Surge of Migrants at the Border Never Stopped

Remember the surge of often-unaccompanied children that came across America’s southern border in the summer of 2014?

 

 

Because of the national media’s intermittent-at-best interest in our southern border, it was easy to think the problem had died down or dwindled a bit. Apparently, the numbers never really went down for long.

 

Now, the 2014 figures were for children, and the recent figures were for all ages, but you get the picture. Migrants kept coming – often driven by the rumor that the United States government was providing “permisos” to those who made the journey. The Department of Homeland Security ran an op-ed in Spanish-language outlets in 2014 declaring that there are no “permisos” for unattended children. The announcement apparently had little to no effect.

 

So now the U.S. government, at considerable taxpayer expense, is constructing new facilities to process and care for these people coming across the border. It is the compassionate thing to do – but it is also not fair to expect America to underwrite the costs of caring for and educating the impoverished of Central American countries.

 

 

I wonder how many "unaccompanied children" die along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...