B-Man Posted February 23, 2017 Author Share Posted February 23, 2017 Democrats Attack Trump For Enforcing Their Own Immigration Law Original Article Immigration: The deportation rules announced this week by Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly were greeted with the expected outrage from the usual suspects. But since when is enforcing the law a crime? In this case, the law that Kelly plans to enforce is the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, which was approved by 52 Democrats in the Senate and 202 Democrats in the House in a Democrat-controlled Congress and was signed into law by President Johnson, a Democrat. That hasn´t stopped today´s Democrats from decrying the DHS memo as obscene and horribly un-American. New Jersey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakeYouToTasker Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 That hasn´t stopped today´s Democrats from decrying the DHS memo as obscene and horribly un-American. New Jersey I agree. New Jersey is obscene and un-American. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Beating women "is the last resort" for a Muslim man... https://twitter.com/theboltreport/status/834327717147324416 Well, if the bitches don't do what they're told to do, then what's a righteous Muslim misogynist man supposed to do except beat the crap out of her? It's his right, no it's his DUTY! I agree. New Jersey is obscene and un-American. Hey, I represent that. Moving soon though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Speaking of immigration. What if we give those 1,200 plus Moslems that B. O. said "we'd" take from the Aussies - because they were too toxic to live within a westernized democracy like Australia - to our friends in the great white north who so proudly flaunt their open borders? It would be a match made in heaven. The other spot they could be relocated to would be Guantanamo, but then we'd have to pay their freight and upkeep. I like the idea of them going to Canuckistan better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Speaking of immigration. What if we give those 1,200 plus Moslems that B. O. said "we'd" take from the Aussies - because they were too toxic to live within a westernized democracy like Australia - to our friends in the great white north who so proudly flaunt their open borders? It would be a match made in heaven. The other spot they could be relocated to would be Guantanamo, but then we'd have to pay their freight and upkeep. I like the idea of them going to Canuckistan better. I'm game. Send them to maplemooseville, saskatchewan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Absolutely. To paraphrase Marie Antoinette, "let them rape moose". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 How about Val D'or? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prickly Pete Posted February 23, 2017 Share Posted February 23, 2017 Well, if the bitches don't do what they're told to do, then what's a righteous Muslim misogynist man supposed to do except beat the crap out of her? It's his right, no it's his DUTY! I love the part where he says a counselor might suggest that "maybe next time you should bring her a bunch of flowers, maybe you should bring her a box of chocolates"...but if that doesn't work it's beat down time (but try to avoid her face). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted February 25, 2017 Author Share Posted February 25, 2017 (edited) Just trying to hide from Trump’s ‘reign of terror’...........Media outrage over protections – for us Howie Carr Friday, February 24, 2017 Apparently Angel Luis Rivera Aponte, aka Miguel Baez Zapata, didn’t get the memo about how he’s supposed to be hiding “in the shadows” because of President Trump. On Tuesday, this Dominican national was at the Division of Motor Vehicles in Manchester, N.H., trying to get himself a driver’s license, claiming to be from Manchester, instead of Lawrence, where he’s really from (surprise, surprise). Alas for Mr. Aponte or Zapata, the New Hampshire State Police arrived. According to the press release, the state police, with a little help from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), “were able to confirm that the documents he presented were fraudulent.” Hey, he was just forging the documents Americans can’t be bothered to counterfeit. The charge: unsworn falsification and tampering with public records. I got that N.H. State Police news release yesterday just after I had read yet another sob story about the reign of terror that the Trump administration is allegedly unleashing on America. The New York Times headline: “Immigrants Hide, Fearing Capture on ‘Any Corner.’ ” If only the story had been posted a day earlier — in Spanish — perhaps Aponte or Zapata or whatever his real name is could have avoided spending the night in the Hillsborough County Jail. http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/howie_carr/2017/02/carr_just_trying_to_hide_from_trump_s_reign_of_terror Edited February 25, 2017 by B-Man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 1, 2017 Author Share Posted March 1, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 (edited) Interesting. That's the second time I've seen this. The first time it was a woman posting it. Regardless it's still funny Edited March 2, 2017 by Chef Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 That's got to be a progressive husband's dilemma right there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beef Jerky Posted March 2, 2017 Share Posted March 2, 2017 Watching the BBMB members flock here makes me realize the refugee problem Trump was talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Where the hell is the revised constitutional travel ban? We were told this was a top priority and needed immediately to keep the terrorist hordes of refugees out. Trump is letting the bad hombres pour into the country. Bad! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IDBillzFan Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Where the hell is the revised constitutional travel ban? We were told this was a top priority and needed immediately to keep the terrorist hordes of refugees out. Trump is letting the bad hombres pour into the country. Bad! Anyone know what kind of whine pairs well with this meltdown? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keukasmallies Posted March 3, 2017 Share Posted March 3, 2017 Anyone know what kind of whine pairs well with this meltdown? Probably ICE wine.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Anyone know what kind of whine pairs well with this meltdown? Liberal tears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pine Barrens Mafia Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 Liberal tears. Satisfying Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-Man Posted March 5, 2017 Author Share Posted March 5, 2017 Where the hell is the revised constitutional travel ban? We were told this was a top priority and needed immediately to keep the terrorist hordes of refugees out. Trump is letting the bad hombres pour into the country. Bad! THE HILL: Trump expected to sign new travel order Monday: reports. Trump is expected to sign the new order at the Department of Homeland Security, according to Politico, which reported that DHS employees were instructed to work from home that morning. Details of the new order have not been released, and it is unclear whether it includes significant changes from the original order signed in late January. The new order will follow the hectic roll out of the first controversial executive action, which imposed a 90-day ban on nationals from seven predominantly Muslim countries entering the U.S. The Associated Press reported earlier this week that the forthcoming order no longer includes Iraq among the affected nations, but that Iran, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Libya and Sudan would remain on the list. The initial order also called for a 120-day ban on admitting refugees and an indefinite suspension on resettling Syrian refugees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts