Deranged Rhino Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 George Clooney’s next door neighbor is planning to hold his own fundraiser — to benefit Bernie Sanders — during the actor’s posh Hollywood soiree Saturday night with Hillary Clinton. Howard Gold, whose family founded the 99 Cents Only store chain, is calling his bash the “99% Party,” with tickets selling for $27 per person. An email invite sent to Sanders supporters Saturday reads: “Swimming pools, Movie Stars, and merriment for all! This is happening right next door to Clooney's party for Hillary!” The invite also notes that "no-one (will be) turned away for a lack of funds." http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/276571-clooneys-neighbor-throwing-saturday-fundraiser-for-sanders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 George Clooneys next door neighbor is planning to hold his own fundraiser to benefit Bernie Sanders during the actors posh Hollywood soiree Saturday night with Hillary Clinton. Howard Gold, whose family founded the 99 Cents Only store chain, is calling his bash the 99% Party, with tickets selling for $27 per person. An email invite sent to Sanders supporters Saturday reads: Swimming pools, Movie Stars, and merriment for all! This is happening right next door to Clooney's party for Hillary! The invite also notes that "no-one (will be) turned away for a lack of funds." http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/276571-clooneys-neighbor-throwing-saturday-fundraiser-for-sanders Nice move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Guests at the Sanders party are encouraged to take their fair share of Hors D'oeuvres from Hillary's party next door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Obviously there is a shitload of professionals and academics who strongly disagree with you. https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Wall-St-Letter-1.pdf And they would be wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbillievable Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Obviously there is a shitload of professionals and academics who strongly disagree with you. https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Wall-St-Letter-1.pdf The very first paragraph states that their goal is make it possible for businesses to fail. In fact, the entire letter is about finding a way to allow MORE businesses to fail so that they can enact a form of JUSTICE that was denied to them by government assistance to these companies. While I agree with the premise that breaking up companies, to force competition, is good for the consumer, it does not prevent economic calamity; Nor does Sanders' plan even seek to do this. He just wants to make the Wallstreet fat-cats pay... for something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 He's not making fun of you ---> http://www.cc.com/video-clips/63ite2/the-colbert-report-the-word---truthiness Canadians don't have access to comedy central online you ignorant partisan hack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Obviously there is a shitload of professionals and academics who strongly disagree with you. https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Wall-St-Letter-1.pdf Obviously there is a shitload of professionals and academics who strongly disagree with you. https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Wall-St-Letter-1.pdf Aside from Robert "I'm a huge socialist" Reich, who are these people? Never heard of them. Even the president, you know the guys economic policies you completely support, even his top economic men think Sander's economic plans consist of flying unicorns that fart rainbows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Conner? Conner?? Have we entered a time warp again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Conner? Conner?? Have we entered a time warp again? I'm guessing gator got banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiberius Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 I'm guessing gator got banned. Ha! Wrong yet again. Twice, not banned and I am not conner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdnlng Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 2Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, 3Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram, 4Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, 5Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse, Conner the father of Gator, whose mother was Blzrle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Everyone who is not a brainwashed Republican loyalist are apparently all the same person. That swings both ways. There are plenty on here who think everyone here is actually DC Tom when we all know only 75% of the posters here are DC Tom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 I could never mistake DC Tom's dimented versions of the truth for any of the many piles of brain tissue sludge who frequent this board. Oh, now this is fun. Go on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Those damn rich people taking advantage of tax loopholes. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/income-tax-sanders-clinton-trump-cruz-kasich-181125187.html# Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Most of the amoeba powered brains on this forum are lucky to find the power button on their computers. Even more impressive is they somehow figure out how to push it. DC Tom, however, is a different breed. DC Tom knows the history of that buttons manufacturing. He knows all about how it was engineered and the thought process put into it's design. He can speak to how optimal the button is compared to other buttons. But DC Tom is missing a circuit somewhere. DC Tom will insist the button is only an off button. It doesn't turn on the computer. We don't know how the button turns on, there is not enough research on that topic. The verdict is still out there, the science is not decided on how to turn the computer on. I still have no idea how DC Tom manages to actually get his computer on. It's not a button, it's a switch. You moron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 It's not a button, it's a switch. You moron. It's the bastard child of a button and a switch. A son of a switch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 Hrm.. I think you are right. Now I'm going to go back and question every button related position I've ever held. All of my button-lore beliefs are now brought into question. Of course I'm right, dolt. A switch has two or more static positions ("on" or "off", "true" or "false", "start/stop/reset/boost"). You set the switch to the desired state, it stays in that state. A button has only two states: a single static state - usually "open" - and an alternate state that requires continuous user input (i.e. "press here.") If you press a button to make something do something, and that something keeps doing that something after you let the button go, you're pressing a switch. !@#$ing oaf. I hate it when you show up. It's like you crawl out of your hole, I see your shadow, and it's six more weeks of stupid. Go back in to your hole already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 It's not a button, it's a switch. You moron. Most of the amoeba powered brains on this forum are lucky to find the power button on their computers. Even more impressive is they somehow figure out how to push it. DC Tom, however, is a different breed. DC Tom knows the history of that buttons manufacturing. He knows all about how it was engineered and the thought process put into it's design. He can speak to how optimal the button is compared to other buttons. But DC Tom is missing a circuit somewhere. DC Tom will insist the button is only an off button. It doesn't turn on the computer. We don't know how the button turns on, there is not enough research on that topic. The verdict is still out there, the science is not decided on how to turn the computer on. I still have no idea how DC Tom manages to actually get his computer on. Did some of us think gator was conner reincarnated? If so this proves they are two different people. Gator couldn't come close to this somewhat creative insult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 Did some of us think gator was conner reincarnated? If so this proves they are two different people. Gator couldn't come close to this somewhat creative insult. You're right but park, Duck_dodgers,etc was gator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deranged Rhino Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 Voting machines down all over Brooklyn: https://vid.me/DAIi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts