Jump to content

Scott Chandler to the PATS!


KDIGGZ

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

He will never make the 53. The Pats* will mine him for information, and cut him loose.

 

What information? Whole new staff and offensive plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you kick your girlfriend to the curb for fresh kitty you kind of lose the right to be pissed when she starts !@#$ing the good looking guy who used to beat you up.

 

:lol:

 

Sure, because real life is rational. Sports aren't. I don't wish death upon anyone, but I do root for a three plane mid-air collision between the *pats, fins, and jests team planes. That's just football.

 

:nana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

If he gets on the field. Hard to do with Gronk and Wright ahead of him.

 

We shall see. I wonder how successful Gronkowski (I hate calling him "Gronk") would have been with the Bills? Probably would have put up pedestrian numbers. Basically, any receiver puts up pedestrian numbers here.

Edited by HoF Watkins
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New England sports media says it a great signing, said he always hurt the pats down the seam. Still can't understand why he cut him before we got clay signed. It gonna suck if we miss on clay. What options do we have?

 

Most of Whaley's moves make sense. We can clearly see the logic even when we disagree.

 

But releasing Chandler without Clay on the roster is a head-scratcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We shall see. I wonder how successful Gronkowski (I hate calling him "Gronk") would have been with the Bills? Probably would have put up pedestrian numbers. Basically, any receiver puts up pedestrian numbers here.

Have you ever seen Chandler run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

We shall see. I wonder how successful Gronkowski (I hate calling him "Gronk") would have been with the Bills? Probably would have put up pedestrian numbers. Basically, any receiver puts up pedestrian numbers here.

 

If you're comparing Chandler to Gronk in any way, you're more of a *pats fan than I originally thought. Yes, Brady is better than any QB the Bills have had during Chandler's time, but he's played on more than just the Bills. Chandler is a known commodity, he in no way stacks up to Gronk athletically, blocking wise, route running wise -- he does nothing better.

 

Wright isn't a TE but a split end playing TE. Chandler could beat him out... but he won't, because Wright is the better receiver and has a year in the system under his belt, including a year of trust with Tommy Terrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're comparing Chandler to Gronk in any way, you're more of a *pats fan than I originally thought. Yes, Brady is better than any QB the Bills have had during Chandler's time, but he's played on more than just the Bills. Chandler is a known commodity, he in no way stacks up to Gronk athletically, blocking wise, route running wise -- he does nothing better.

He's better at staying healthy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love how Schefter said he adds "depth." Yet he was starting here. Of course.

As long as Gronk is still there, Chandler IS depth.

He will never make the 53. The Pats* will mine him for information, and cut him loose.

New HC, new OC. Yeah I'm sure he will be a wealth of information ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

his below average blocking skills will be his demise as a Patriot. But it is a good signing for them, he now is what he should have been with us, a third string TE.

Unless, just maybe, they COACH him up some. Maybe no one told him? After the last few years, nothing would surprise me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless, just maybe, they COACH him up some. Maybe no one told him? After the last few years, nothing would surprise me.

 

if he suddenly learns how to block, it will tell me more about Chandler than our coaching staff or NE's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...