13player Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 If we don't move forward with Hacket as OC and Schwartz as head coach, the team was good last year, we made progress. Let hacket run the offence, he knows what he has to work with, everyone knows the system both defense and offence changing things up now is crazy. Lets ride out the third year and see what hacket can do calling the plays, nothing changes if we do and sometime that's a good thing. Getting a new head coach, does not solve our QB issue but it does introduce a whole bunch of new potential issues. If Schwartz and Hacket fail, then hire a new coach who can pick his own QB with a number 1 pick. Please don't go backwards, I think if Nate lets EJ play his game, and not force to stay in the pocket and allow him to move around a bit you will be surprised at what EJ can do. Personally I think Marone tried to fit a square peg into a round hole with EJ, just let the kid play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 This IS the 1st post to ever say that we are crazy to NOT keep Hackett. We have offcially hit rock bottom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guffalo Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 If we don't move forward with Hacket as OC and Schwartz as head coach, the team was good last year, we made progress. Let hacket run the offence, he knows what he has to work with, everyone knows the system both defense and offence changing things up now is crazy. Lets ride out the third year and see what hacket can do calling the plays, nothing changes if we do and sometime that's a good thing. Getting a new head coach, does not solve our QB issue but it does introduce a whole bunch of new potential issues. If Schwartz and Hacket fail, then hire a new coach who can pick his own QB with a number 1 pick. Please don't go backwards, I think if Nate lets EJ play his game, and not force to stay in the pocket and allow him to move around a bit you will be surprised at what EJ can do. Personally I think Marone tried to fit a square peg into a round hole with EJ, just let the kid play. Thank you for your input Mrs. Hacket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 meh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 This IS the 1st post to ever say that we are crazy to NOT keep Hackett. We have offcially hit rock bottom. In fairness, Mike in Horseheads did start a thread about Nate as a 'candidate.' Though, Mike had tongue firmly planted in cheek. This is the true nadir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BringBackFergy Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 Hackett is a Marrone appointee and BFF. Marrone chose to leave the Bills. The Bills are better off without Marrone (douche factor) Ergo, the Bills are better off without Hackett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhg Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 Least amount of rushing yards for a 16 game season in the history of the team. That is all I need to know that Hackett should not be back. And WE are the crazy ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 In fairness, Mike in Horseheads did start a thread about Nate as a 'candidate.' Though, Mike had tongue firmly planted in cheek. This is the true nadir. I had to look up nadir. I thought it may be synonymous with trolling. After learning the definition, I agree that it is nadir and also believe it's trolling. Or another one of those unfunny jokes that have been popping up all over the place. IT'S IN MY BLOOD!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS 56 Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 I do not think the decision will be the Bill's to make. Where Marrone lands, Hackett goes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 ..... trolling. Agreed. the 'high' post count and questionable logic are clear to see. He could have at least spelled Hackett correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TC in St. Louis Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 Nadir. Wasn't he the fella who had all the problems with the Corvair? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hapless Bills Fan Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 (edited) If we don't move forward with Hacket as OC and Schwartz as head coach, the team was good last year, we made progress. Let hacket run the offence, he knows what he has to work with, everyone knows the system both defense and offence changing things up now is crazy. Lets ride out the third year and see what hacket can do calling the plays, nothing changes if we do and sometime that's a good thing. Getting a new head coach, does not solve our QB issue but it does introduce a whole bunch of new potential issues. If Schwartz and Hacket fail, then hire a new coach who can pick his own QB with a number 1 pick. Please don't go backwards, I think if Nate lets EJ play his game, and not force to stay in the pocket and allow him to move around a bit you will be surprised at what EJ can do. Personally I think Marone tried to fit a square peg into a round hole with EJ, just let the kid play. Consistancy. It's only a virtue if you're Not a Screwup On D: consistency good On O: consistency bad idea, very bad. The O already went backwards, far backwards in the last 2 years. I have a better idea. Let's just keep the defense on the field, except for Wood, Spiller and Goodwin The opponent's defensive line, used to bearing down on hapless OLmen, will get that "deer in the headlights" glare whilst faced by a charging Mario Williams who will then proceed to rassel them down, field dress them, and send their heads to the taxidermist to be stuffed and mounted. Meanwhile the opponent's LB and DB, used to pushing around hapless WR, will be flabbergasted and flattened by Bradham, Spikes, Alonso, and Brown leaving Gilmore and McKelvin to lead block whilst Spiller and Goodwin charge down the field at the speed of light, throwing laterals back and forth to each other. Might be as effective as keeping Hackett, what do you think? Edited January 5, 2015 by Hopeful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 We are crazy. All your base are belong to us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gugny Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 Nadir. Wasn't he the fella who had all the problems with the Corvair? Ha! My first car was a 1961 Corvair. LOVED that car!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kirby Jackson Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 It's really hard to tell who is trolling and who is clueless at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miyagi-Do Karate Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 Agreed. the 'high' post count and questionable logic are clear to see. He could have at least spelled Hackett correctly. There must really be a guy named "hacket," because the OP surely wasn't referring to Hackett. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsFanM.D. Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 It's really hard to tell who is trolling and who is clueless at this point. True. There must really be a guy named "hacket," because the OP surely wasn't referring to Hackett. Well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D. L. Hot-Flamethrower Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 If we don't move forward with Hacket as OC and Schwartz as head coach, the team was good last year, we made progress. Let hacket run the offence, he knows what he has to work with, everyone knows the system both defense and offence changing things up now is crazy. Lets ride out the third year and see what hacket can do calling the plays, nothing changes if we do and sometime that's a good thing. Getting a new head coach, does not solve our QB issue but it does introduce a whole bunch of new potential issues. If Schwartz and Hacket fail, then hire a new coach who can pick his own QB with a number 1 pick. Please don't go backwards, I think if Nate lets EJ play his game, and not force to stay in the pocket and allow him to move around a bit you will be surprised at what EJ can do. Personally I think Marone tried to fit a square peg into a round hole with EJ, just let the kid play. Not a fan of this. The downside is Hackett is REALLY a part of the problem-highly probable. Also, can we afford to waste another year with our D. Upside is: not really sure, Hackett is the next Bill Walsh-HIGHLY UNLIKELY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 [This is an automated response] As a courtesy to the other board members, please use more descriptive topic titles. A better title will help the community find information faster and make your topic more likely to be read. The topic starter can edit the topic title line to make it more appropriate. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KOKBILLS Posted January 5, 2015 Share Posted January 5, 2015 It's really hard to tell who is trolling and who is clueless at this point. My head is spinning... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts