Jump to content

Global warming err Climate change HOAX


Recommended Posts

Owning solar panels is racist.

 

http://news.yahoo.com/u-solar-industry-battles-white-privilege-image-problem-062508186.html

 

Those who identified themselves as white made up 73 percent of the shoppers and the rest did not declare their race. EnergySage said nearly 80 percent of shoppers reported household incomes of $50,000 or more and nearly a third declared incomes of $125,000 or more.

Since minorities make up a disproportionate number of low-income households, some advocacy groups have opposed certain solar power initiatives arguing that they deepen social and racial inequality.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

As predicted.............. :lol:.......

Climate Negotiators Hail 'Historic' Paris Draft Agreement...

 

 

 

 

 

Reminders:

 

thecopritual.png?resize=570%2C806

 

 

FTA:

In fact, emissions reductions are barely on the table at all. Instead, the talks are rigged to ensure an agreement is reached regardless of how little action countries plan to take. The developing world, projected to account for four-fifths of all carbon-dioxide emissions this century, will earn applause for what amounts to a promise to stay on their pre-existing trajectory of emissions-intensive growth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

As predicted.............. :lol:.......

Climate Negotiators Hail 'Historic' Paris Draft Agreement...

 

 

 

 

 

Reminders:

 

thecopritual.png?resize=570%2C806

 

 

FTA:

In fact, emissions reductions are barely on the table at all. Instead, the talks are rigged to ensure an agreement is reached regardless of how little action countries plan to take. The developing world, projected to account for four-fifths of all carbon-dioxide emissions this century, will earn applause for what amounts to a promise to stay on their pre-existing trajectory of emissions-intensive growth.

 

 

 

What I'm really looking forward to is the conflict between Obama's "I agreed to it, the EPA's going to implement it within the regulatory framework, so it's law, so !@#$ you" message to Congress and Congress' "It's an international treaty, we have to approve it, so !@#$ you" message to the White house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION: What will poor countries do with the $800B the US has pledged to them to fight "climate change"?

 

ANSWER: Enrich their leaders.

 

 

 

 

 

Paris Climate deal says China, Cuba, Iran get to decide their own contribution: "Nationally determined contribution" to cut emissions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greenpeace co-founder reports Greenpeace to the FBI under RICO and wire-fraud statutes http://wp.me/p7y4l-zqD

 

 

 

 

 

Climate Talks Reveal Progressivism’s True Hypocrisy.

Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUESTION: What will poor countries do with the $800B the US has pledged to them to fight "climate change"?

 

ANSWER: Enrich their leaders.

International aid is the political process through which the global elite force poor people in rich countries to gift capital to rich people in poor countries.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

News of the Global Warming Climate Change We Can Believe In Disruption Chaos deal has been discussed the World over from Barack Obama to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

let me catch my breath here before continuing, it's a long list

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't even breath the air in parts of India and china. It's kind of like our environmentalists have been so successful defeating the polluters and the sh. It eaters that want to vote for the pro pollution lobby that it doesn't seem like that big of an issue here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Developing countries are not satisfied with the amount of money promised in Paris resolution; Demand more "climate justice"

 

http://news.yahoo.com/paris-climate-deal-throws-frayed-lifeline-poor-095015249.html

 

There was disappointment among some at a stipulation that the loss and damage provision in the core agreement "does not involve or provide a basis for any liability or compensation" - a demand from the United States, and backed by other rich nations.

The U.S. insisted on that exclusion due to fears that industrialised countries could be forced to pay for the losses and damages caused by global warming, due to their high levels of carbon pollution over time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What I'm really looking forward to is the conflict between Obama's "I agreed to it, the EPA's going to implement it within the regulatory framework, so it's law, so !@#$ you" message to Congress and Congress' "It's an international treaty, we have to approve it, so !@#$ you" message to the White house.

Well, if the GOP wasn't absent on the issue and simply doing the bidding of the Koch brothers they might show just a little leadership on this crucial issue facing the General Welfare of our nation and the world

 

So ya, let's fault Obama for trying to do what's right in the face of a bought up Congress

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They can't even breath the air in parts of India and china. It's kind of like our environmentalists have been so successful defeating the polluters and the sh. It eaters that want to vote for the pro pollution lobby that it doesn't seem like that big of an issue here.

China is commie and your solution is to give government more control. In China the government controls everything and you say they can't even breathe. How do you make sense to yourself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

China is commie and your solution is to give government more control. In China the government controls everything and you say they can't even breathe. How do you make sense to yourself?

 

as posted earlier

 

Paris Climate deal says China, Cuba, Iran get to decide their own contribution

 

 

 

 

 

The Unintentional Comedy of the Paris Climate Conference
The Paris conference on global warming as a result of greenhouse-gas emission was a wonderful example of unintentional comedy. I know next to nothing about the technicalities of the subject, but caught on television news bulletins great wafts of hot air.
It was highly enjoyable to hear President Obama claiming to be saving the planet that his foreign policy has done much to endanger. More forlorn than usual as he worked in a phrase to and for unborn generations, Secretary of State Kerry had the air of a man in a dark room fumbling for the light switch but unable to find it
. Some official is quoted saying that the final two days of the conference were “among the most chaotic I have ever seen.” Lo and behold, all countries have signed up to report how they are doing by way of reducing emissions, but there’s no supervision, let alone compulsion to do what they have agreed.
To cut to the chase, $80 billion are to be paid every year by rich countries to poor countries.
Lots of pretty young women from all over the world then appeared on the screen smiling in praise of the unearned wealth they expect to be coming shortly.
You don’t have to be a cynic to think that most countries, China and India in the lead, are never going to do anything that might harm their economic development, nor will rich countries commit economic suicide.
Edited by B-Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, if the GOP wasn't absent on the issue and simply doing the bidding of the Koch brothers they might show just a little leadership on this crucial issue facing the General Welfare of our nation and the world

 

So ya, let's fault Obama for trying to do what's right in the face of a bought up Congress

 

You're counter-argument to the degradation of the very underpinning of our means of government is "Koch brothers!"

 

You're an idiot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You're counter-argument to the degradation of the very underpinning of our means of government is "Koch brothers!"

 

You're an idiot.

Basically you are a pimple in this thread, and that's it.

China is commie and your solution is to give government more control. In China the government controls everything and you say they can't even breathe. How do you make sense to yourself?

Hey! That's a neat little argument that goes no where! Congrats!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘MOST POWERFUL WEAPON’: JOHN KERRY URGES ‘PUBLIC SHAMING’ TO ENFORCE NEW CLIMATE AGREEMENT.

 

 

Okay, I'll start:

Five luxury homes, 76-foot yacht, SUV, and a private jet: John Kerry models the lifestyle of a liberal who allegedly believed James Hansen’s 1988 carbon dioxide warning.

 

 

 

 

 

"Someone had changed a single word in the draft text — from a 'should' to a 'shall' — and suddenly the entire climate deal appeared at risk of faltering."

"Secretary of State John F. Kerry phoned his old friend, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius, in exasperation over a tiny revision that implied huge new legal and financial obligations. 'We cannot do this,' Kerry warned."

Tiny? One word is not tiny. If you think the difference between "should" and "shall" is tiny, you can't be trusted to proofread the text of a deal. Good for Kerry, noticing. But in saying "We cannot do this," he revealed something quite un-tiny.

 

 

The U.S. team, led by Kerry and chief climate negotiator Todd Stern, struggled to fend off demands from small island states and other poorer countries for guaranteed “loss and damage” compensation, essentially payment for negative impacts of climate change. But the Obama administration would not contemplate such an open-ended financial obligation that Congress would have to approve and U.S. citizens would have to pay for....

After the call to Fabius, U.S. and French officials decided together that the word change had been accidental. As such, it could be handled as an ordinary typographical error and erased at the discretion of the conference leader

 

.

Sure it was. B-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

as posted earlier

 

Paris Climate deal says China, Cuba, Iran get to decide their own contribution

 

 

 

 

 

The Unintentional Comedy of the Paris Climate Conference
The Paris conference on global warming as a result of greenhouse-gas emission was a wonderful example of unintentional comedy. I know next to nothing about the technicalities of the subject, but caught on television news bulletins great wafts of hot air.
It was highly enjoyable to hear President Obama claiming to be saving the planet that his foreign policy has done much to endanger. More forlorn than usual as he worked in a phrase to and for unborn generations, Secretary of State Kerry had the air of a man in a dark room fumbling for the light switch but unable to find it
. Some official is quoted saying that the final two days of the conference were “among the most chaotic I have ever seen.” Lo and behold, all countries have signed up to report how they are doing by way of reducing emissions, but there’s no supervision, let alone compulsion to do what they have agreed.
To cut to the chase, $80 billion are to be paid every year by rich countries to poor countries.
Lots of pretty young women from all over the world then appeared on the screen smiling in praise of the unearned wealth they expect to be coming shortly.
You don’t have to be a cynic to think that most countries, China and India in the lead, are never going to do anything that might harm their economic development, nor will rich countries commit economic suicide.

 

 

 

If find it amusing that much of the locals here at PPP calls themselves"Libertarian' - banking on the concept that do anything that you want as long as it doesn't harm others - and if it does...you should be responsible. Now here we are - our country the major contributor to GW - and the "Lib"ertariens here want nothing to do with responsibility...hypocrisy at its best...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

If find it amusing that much of the locals here at PPP calls themselves"Libertarian' - banking on the concept that do anything that you want as long as it doesn't harm others - and if it does...you should be responsible. Now here we are - our country the major contributor to GW - and the "Lib"ertariens here want nothing to do with responsibility...hypocrisy at its best...

They do what Rush Limbo tells them to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

If find it amusing that much of the locals here at PPP calls themselves"Libertarian' - banking on the concept that do anything that you want as long as it doesn't harm others - and if it does...you should be responsible. Now here we are - our country the major contributor to GW - and the "Lib"ertariens here want nothing to do with responsibility...hypocrisy at its best...

 

Due process.

 

Show tangible harm done to individuals, prove causation, prove liability, directly assess said liability to individuals.

 

And even then, if it meets that standard, law (which this is not), does not work retroactively.

 

In libertarian philosophy, people don't just get to make claims against you, obligating you to give them money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due process.

 

Show tangible harm done to individuals, prove causation, prove liability, directly assess said liability to individuals.

 

And even then, if it meets that standard, law (which this is not), does not work retroactively.

 

In libertarian philosophy, people don't just get to make claims against you, obligating you to give them money.

Anarchy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...