Best Player Available Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Guilty because a women said he's guilty? Is the nfl turning into a gestapo? Over reaction is the way the PC crowd swings now. Just heard the FCC wants to fine broadcasters for using the word Redskins when calling a Washington game. Dan Patrick is all over it. It is becoming embarrassing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plenzmd1 Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 This is the article the OP linked to last night... http://profootballta...sexual-assault/ thank you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heitz Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 This is the article the OP linked to last night... http://profootballta...sexual-assault/ This whole thread seems to have changed quite a bit from last night (at least the OPs OP)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 WHAT?!?!? A press conference didn't stop all sexual assaults from occurring?? FIRE GOODELL!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CodeMonkey Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Innocent and until proven guilty in a court of law not public opinion or internet message boards. Or King Rogers office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoSaint Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 That's how it worked with Roethlisberger. To be fair he had quite a few accusations floating around even though the bathroom was the main one. His conduct was all around a bad look for the nfl that went beyond a single he said she said night out in the town that can be very hard to judge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Guilty because a women said he's guilty? Is the nfl turning into a gestapo? She was probably wearing a short skirt too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LB3 Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 This whole thread seems to have changed quite a bit from last night (at least the OPs OP)... It did. I'm assuming the OP was told to remove the rest of his post because he typed out the entire article he linked (with some odd spelling changes), instead of just a small excerpt. My first reply was also removed because it was a little too snarky I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchmurraydowntown Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Gloria comes on TV & I change the channel, she's unwatchable & not credible at all towards the facts (like most lawyers). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Over reaction is the way the PC crowd swings now. Just heard the FCC wants to fine broadcasters for using the word Redskins when calling a Washington game. Dan Patrick is all over it. It is becoming embarrassing. Talk about reaching to making a generalization. What does the Washington Slurs have to do with a woman possibly being sexually assaulted? She was probably wearing a short skirt too. She was asking for it. Like Lattimore from The Program, she was leading him on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoloinOhio Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 @ProFootballTalk: Cowboys will wait for charges before making decision on C.J. Spillman http://t.co/4nQsOV6riA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Thread goes boom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benderbender Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 Two game suspension? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-9 Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 @ProFootballTalk: Cowboys will wait for charges before making decision on C.J. Spillman http://t.co/4nQsOV6riA That's the right thing to do. GO BILLS!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. WEO Posted October 2, 2014 Share Posted October 2, 2014 I'm collectively apathetic. Is there a video to stir my sanctimonious outrage? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfan89 Posted October 3, 2014 Share Posted October 3, 2014 (edited) Aren't you innocent until proven guilty? Why should a man not be allowed to go to work and do what he loves because there is an accusation against him? The way we are so quick to sell out others civil liberties just because they are inconvenient is stupid and caving to pressure from groups who only care to further their agendas. If this guy is proven guilty then he deserves the full penalty of the law and he should be given additional sever punishments by the NFL if he ever wants to continue his pro-career. But until the man gets convicted he should be allowed to resume his life. Anyone can accuse anyone of anything. Until you are proven guilty you are innocent. Yes it might mean the possibility of a guilty person playing in the NFL a few weeks longer, but do we really want to live in a society where accusations could cost a man valuable years of his career simply because its bad PR? As fans we should really care about the rights of the accused players when looking at a very nuanced issue and not just how things look for the league. Edited October 3, 2014 by billsfan89 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts