Jump to content

Does The EJ Benching Make Whaley Look Really Bad To New Ownership?


Recommended Posts

I don't think any GM makes this move unless he thinks EJ is "the guy". IMO Whaley might have made one of the biggest blunders in this 14 years of ineptness and set new ownership back a minimum of 2 years.

 

If you go back and look at that draft without the benefit of hindsight, there wasn't a pick that the Bills absolutely needed at #16. The only player you could've made a case for was Eifert and he's been underwhelming to this point.

 

That being said I thought the pick was disastrous at the time and wanted desperately to trade out of it. I was really down on Whaley for thinking EJ was the guy but being accountable and correcting the situation this quickly says way more than a bad evaluation on a QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Of course it doesn't. EJ did not play up to expectations so they benched him. It doesn't mean his career is over, just means he needs to step back for awhile and learn from a veteran. Most successful QB's in the league have gotten to do that. I think it is a smart move and will make EJ a better QB in the long run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Watkins trade will be his undoing. Huge overpayment when they could have stayed put and gotten great talent (Benjamin is better that Watkins so far, I know its still early). And we still would have the #1 next year. I hated the trade at the time. I hate it even more now since Sammy seems soft like CJ.

 

Is Benjamin better than Watkins ? Or does he have a QB that iSight years ahead of EJ throwing to him?Watkins looks so wide open most times and EJ barely gets the ball to him. He still is likely not worth 2 firsts but he looks to be dynamic for a real QB. As far as Whaley, he was on board with EJ but that was Buddy Nix's final draft and there was talk afterward that they were entertaining the thought of trading down again... Nix said he was worried and didn't do it, perhaps Whaley knew it was still too high for EJ and wanted to make the second trade down.. I think that is likely

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think any GM makes this move unless he thinks EJ is "the guy". IMO Whaley might have made one of the biggest blunders in this 14 years of ineptness and set new ownership back a minimum of 2 years.

 

I believe Terry Pegula is smart enough to realize that the current management (and coaching) is a disaster. I agree with you that the team has been set back several years by using three 1st round draft picks to draft EJ Manuel and Sammy Watkins. Blunders like these can set a team back many years. Where is the logic selecting a WR for two 1st round picks when you don't have a QB who can get him the ball?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kind of leaning towards yes in that it makes the Watkins trade look bad. I like Watkins, a lot and am glad the Bills grabbed him. But the Bills didn't have Orton on the roster when they selected him. They had EJ. And if there was any doubt about EJ, you don't make that trade, IMO because they had no backup plan. Why trade up for a WR when you don't have a QB you trust to get him the ball? So either he doesn't know how to evaluate the talent he has (EJ) or he makes desperate moves. Sure it looks ok now, because Orton is in Buffalo but if Orton doesn't pull the Bills together it will certainly cost the FO their jobs.

 

Devils advocate view...

Edited by Wayne Cubed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it doesn't. EJ did not play up to expectations so they benched him. It doesn't mean his career is over, just means he needs to step back for awhile and learn from a veteran. Most successful QB's in the league have gotten to do that. I think it is a smart move and will make EJ a better QB in the long run.

 

I couldn't disagree more with you. EJ played "up" to precisely what my expectations of him were: nothing. It is a black mark on the record of Whaley and anyone else associated with the team if they thought this guy was starting NFL material.

 

Further, this DOES mean EJ's career is over, at least in Buffalo. Good luck finding other teams around the league to view him differently. Almost no one in the NFL has shared the Bills' rosy impression of Manuel this entire time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad picks have been made by every team in the league. Whaley is not immune. Looking at this in the present tense, I admire the move to switch to Orton...many have stated that the Bills management would look like fools for making such a change. I am more concerned with how foolish they'd have look for NOT making the change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Watkins deal was a mistake. It's just crazy to sink two high first rounders into one player unless it's a can't miss QB.

 

As for EJ, benching him now shows they aren't afraid to make a move to save the season. Problem is the late season schedule is brutal, the Bills needed to get off to a fast start and they now have very little room for error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With respect to EJ, many of you are forgetting that we traded down and used the subsequent pick on Kiko Alonso. Alonso would be a top 10 pick if the draft was re-done today.

 

So yeah, he whiffed on EJ, but he nailed Alonso. Not to mention the price was high for Watkins but he's a stud receiver. Whoever call him "soft", that's hilarious. Guy is playing with broken ribs. What a wussy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm kind of leaning towards yes in that it makes the Watkins trade look bad. I like Watkins, a lot and am glad the Bills grabbed him. But the Bills didn't have Orton on the roster when they selected him. They had EJ. And if there was any doubt about EJ, you don't make that trade, IMO because they had no backup plan. Why trade up for a WR when you don't have a QB you trust to get him the ball? So either he doesn't know how to evaluate the talent he has (EJ) or he makes desperate moves. Sure it looks ok now, because Orton is in Buffalo but if Orton doesn't pull the Bills together it will certainly cost the FO their jobs.

 

Devils advocate view...

And the trade amounted to a clear declaration the the Bills would not be needing to draft a QB in 2015, which we now know was very wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you go back and look at that draft without the benefit of hindsight, there wasn't a pick that the Bills absolutely needed at #16. The only player you could've made a case for was Eifert and he's been underwhelming to this point.

 

That being said I thought the pick was disastrous at the time and wanted desperately to trade out of it. I was really down on Whaley for thinking EJ was the guy but being accountable and correcting the situation this quickly says way more than a bad evaluation on a QB.

 

Truth be told, there were at least a couple of occasions since last draft that I was tempted to beat you over the (virtual) head for your extreme opinion re: EJ. But I am here to admit that so far you look to be right. I also remember you praising the Marrone hire (I had no opinion on it), so I am now hoping that you are right on that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Bills end up with a winning record this year and make the playoffs, Whaley will survive, even with the benching of EJ and whether or not he was responsible for drafting EJ. Since I doubt Pegula will make any moves mid-season, we will need to see how things play out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...