Jump to content

Bush vs Obama: Who's Worse?


Bush vs Obama  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Who's worse?

    • George W Bush
      24
    • Barack H Obama
      49
    • Both are equally as bad
      8


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 594
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Half the Libyan state airline is missing. They're expecting some sort of attack on the 11th.

 

Maybe not in NYC...but no, I am not making that up.

 

Lets wargame. What are potential targets?

 

The Suez? Oil Fields?

Could they make it across the Med to Naples? Or across Ethiopia to Djibouti?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

American Carriers and significant land based sites near airports to cause confusion.

 

Carriers are a small moving target with a CAP and surface to air missiles. WWII Kamikazes had a low hit rate and they flew at a much lower altitude and were considerably more agile than a commercial jetliner.

 

If they hit anything, it will be a stationary target that doesn't shoot back

Edited by /dev/null
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Carriers are a small moving target with a CAP and surface to air missiles. WWII Kamikazes had a low hit rate and they flew at a much lower altitude and were considerably more agile than a commercial jetliner.

 

If they hit anything, it will be a stationary target that doesn't shoot back

So you're suggesting it will be a Liberal target?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carriers are a small moving target with a CAP and surface to air missiles. WWII Kamikazes had a low hit rate and they flew at a much lower altitude and were considerably more agile than a commercial jetliner.

 

If they hit anything, it will be a stationary target that doesn't shoot back

So you're suggesting it will be a Liberal target?

 

:lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's all meet in TriBeCa on the 11th.

 

If the planes take off from Libya they will use up much of their fuel before they get past most European capitals. I think Rome, Paris, London, and Berlin would be opportune targets as would the US bases in Germany.

 

You know these azz hats are going to strike again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's all meet in TriBeCa on the 11th.

 

If the planes take off from Libya they will use up much of their fuel before they get past most European capitals. I think Rome, Paris, London, and Berlin would be opportune targets as would the US bases in Germany.

 

You know these azz hats are going to strike again.

 

Rome possibly, but Paris, London, and Germany would spend too long over sovereign airspace. Somebody might notice the large unidentified aircraft on the radar screen. Longer they spend over the Med or North Africa, the greater the element of surprise

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rome possibly, but Paris, London, and Germany would spend too long over sovereign airspace. Somebody might notice the large unidentified aircraft on the radar screen. Longer they spend over the Med or North Africa, the greater the element of surprise

 

Stop giving them ideas dammit!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...I would just crash an a320 or two into a nuclear power plant/s somewhere in southern Europe near the Med coast to limit the amount of time in that counties airspace reducing the chance of an intercept. That would cause chaos in europe.

 

Or change out the transmitter in the a330, fly to somewhere in the UAE and then follow the well established and busy air route from DXB to LHR and there ya go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh...I would just crash an a320 or two into a nuclear power plant/s somewhere in southern Europe near the Med coast to limit the amount of time in that counties airspace reducing the chance of an intercept. That would cause chaos in europe.

 

Good luck with that. Even an A380 is likely to do little more than bounce off a containment dome.

 

Would still cause chaos, though, as everyone panicked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...