808 Posted November 5, 2013 Share Posted November 5, 2013 i like sefarian jenkins out of UW more than the carolina TE but i think we could use another LB mack would be awesome but i think they'd look at CJ mosley first. little bit more versatile can go inside to play with kiko and bump out to lob too. but if i have a choice id like mack in the first and a TE or a guard in the second Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4BillsintheBurgh Posted November 5, 2013 Share Posted November 5, 2013 I'm all for taking a TE in the first round the year after we make the playoffs. Until then we have bigger needs to address. Mack would be nice but I hope a top rated DL is available that will finally put our run defense well into the top half of the league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaybee Posted November 5, 2013 Share Posted November 5, 2013 Looking forward to watching this game. I'll also be paying attention to DB Tomarris Bell. I work with his dad Billy ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saint Doug Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Another point of view would be not which TE can we get, but who can we grab to neutralize opposing TEs. That seems to be more of a problem for us rather than giving EJ another receiver (when it seems he has plenty and Woods should be a stud next season). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewEra Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 (edited) Mack is a beast and I think he'd fit in perfectly. Hughes is a FA. He and kiko would be a great combo. That being said, I think he'll be gone by the time we pick. I'm thinking 12-16 I'd also be happy with mike evans, WR Texas A&M. 6'5 225, sticky hands and 4.45ish speed. If we went the route of a TE, I'd be on board. Sefarian-Jenkins is a specimen. Edited November 6, 2013 by NewEra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K D Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 If the season ended today we would pick 9. Mack would most definitely still be available. A game changing TE would be preferred but are there any out there worthy of a top 10 pick? That would be pretty rare Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir andrew Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Looking good against Ohio tonight! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boatdrinks Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Another point of view would be not which TE can we get, but who can we grab to neutralize opposing TEs. That seems to be more of a problem for us rather than giving EJ another receiver (when it seems he has plenty and Woods should be a stud next season). Â It's a problem for everybody given the NFL rules in the passing game. That's why the TE is such a big weapon if you can find a guy, and the Bills are late to the party. Most DB's can't cover 6'7" basketball players. At least not one on one, those guys don't exist in NFL defenses. We need a TE way more than another db. You just can't cover 'em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 These refs are f'n terrible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 That was epically incompetent officiating. Wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1B4IDie Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 (edited) I'm all for UB and Mack but how was that a safety? The QB was clearly on the 5 when he intentionally grounded? Edited November 6, 2013 by Why So Serious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bills44 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 I'm all for UB and Mack but how was that a safety? The QB was clearly on the 5 when he intentionally grounded? Â They then reviewed the play, only to say, following the review, that the play was not reviewable. Comical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awwufelloff Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Whats everyone saying about drafting the UB running back in one of the later rounds? Guy looks like a stud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJ (not THAT RJ) Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Lazy referee was too busy backpedaling to pay attention… reacted late to the play. Not impressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 6, 2013 Author Share Posted November 6, 2013 (edited) Whats everyone saying about drafting the UB running back in one of the later rounds? Guy looks like a stud.  Oliver is being projected as a 4-7 rounder. A couple more nights like this on national TV and he'll climb. And yes these MAC refs are the worst. A bunch of Mr. Maqoos.  FYI: after 3Q Oliver is 28/187 2 TDs  PTR Edited November 6, 2013 by PromoTheRobot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zow2 Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 Oliver is a Ray Rice and MoJo combo. I'd love to see him on the Bills! They often have practice in the Bills fieldhouse so the staff must know him well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted November 6, 2013 Author Share Posted November 6, 2013 30-3 beatdown. UB has been smoking some bad teams this year but Ohio is supposed to be a good MAC team. Maybe the refs calls have them down but they look like crap tonight. Is Buffalo that good? Â PTR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAWNDO Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 30-3 beatdown. UB has been smoking some bad teams this year but Ohio is supposed to be a good MAC team. Maybe the refs calls have them down but they look like crap tonight. Is Buffalo that good? Â PTR Â Considering that their only two losses came against the fourth and fifth ranked teams in the nation, I think they are pretty good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trader Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 i´d rate TE a bigger need than LB, but any way you take the BPA. so if it happens to be mack when we pick i´m delighted. it it is a premier TE, too. even if we can get a hand on a bookend OT. heck, even a future HOF OG  though we might pick a little high for OG :/ I agree with the BPA although I do think some positions have more value than others. I think with linebackers if you get one with great pass rushing ability that guy is a game changer. I do think that Mack might fit that description. I agree that TE is very high on the needs list and would really help this team to put two viable TE's on the field at the same time. On this team the TE's need to block because Spiller is often a block away from putting 6 on the board. The offensive line need is great as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerball Posted November 6, 2013 Share Posted November 6, 2013 TTU used to be my stomping grounds. From the Red Raider games I've seen this year, Amaro sporadically tends to have the case of the dropsies. He'll make a tough catch and then drop an easy one. Can't remember the game (KSU?), but I remember him dropping THREE straight passes on ONE drive! If the inconsistency continues on the NFL level, don't be surprised if he never fulfills his potential. Saw him earlier vs. OU plus many games on TV (son went to TT, daughter graduating from OU). Very impressive in person but they tend to forget about him for long stretches of a game. I very much like what I saw in person. (sorry for the hijack PTR) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.