Dr. Who

Thanks for the explanation. I'm still irritated by it, but I get your point. It wouldn't matter so much if the years of consecutive KC games didn't also coincide with a time when both teams are in the ascendancy and vying for the top seed in the conference. Fluke or not, it's an advantage for KC.

And the Colts gave up a 3rd round pick to get him. Broncos are in a world of hurt.

Why don't you just tattoo "kick me" across your forehead?

I think he lost his wheels. Not sure that is coming back, but otherwise, a plausible point. On an unrelated matter, could you have a word with your owner? It's obvious you know much more about football, though I suppose it's difficult to post with paws.

I don't really know, obviously, but it seems to me they changed personnel and method late in the season last year. Oline play demonstrably improved and so did the run game. So, I take from that McD is willing to make a midseason change. Maybe they think the current strategy will improve with reps, though I am skeptical. Of course, what would really help is more talent on the oline. I hope it is a priority next year, though probably they'll be looking at safety in the first round knowing their proclivities.

It is confusing. You wish there was a Bills' reporter smart enough to explicitly ask them about their thinking in that respect.

I wish him well-being as a human. As the qb of an opposing team in the division, I do not root for his professional success. When a player on a rival team does actually ascend to the status of MVP level, like Mahomes, I hope they play poorly, especially when they play my team. This is how it normally works when you root for one team and not for another. Football fandom is not an expression of ethical universal charity. I know this seems simplistic. The sort of thing perhaps you explain to an eight year old. So, either you are a troll or you were abused as a child and no one explained to you the basic principles of how to root for a team.

You seem to continually find yourself here, when you obviously belong on a Flipper forum. I don't think Tua ever gets to elite. He's yet to establish himself with certitude as a solid qb, though with the talent around him, that should be feasible.

When Einstein disagrees with you, take the W.

Well, I don't recall Bills' players being taken out by the heat as they were last Sunday. Maybe that's recency bias, but it seems more than a reasonable home field advantage to have one side baking in a level of heat that appears a genuine health risk.

I dunno. Is there easy access for the handicapped? Just wondering if it will be difficult to get there on one leg.

Maybe I should start a thread entitled Poor Posting by Dead Nobel Prize Winning Physicist is Becoming a Theme . . .

They hadn't gotten to interogatives before he quit school.

One of them is inevitable. Borges the great literary writer of philosophical stories tells of an atlas where the scale between map and geography is 1: 1. In short, the rendering is the reality. I have a feeling that's when we'll see the damn things.

Thinking is for losers . . . apparently.

Except that the Fish were under a shaded area for the entire game, so not exactly the same . . .

Dear Einstein's Dog: Yes, we all know now you are the one who really wrote the paper on the General and Special Theory of Relativity. Your human figurehead is off his meds, btw.

Nobody hates you when you're bad. It's backhanded respect. (Ah, right after I posted, I thought, "well, I hate the Pats** even when they suck, so I guess it's a general truth with exceptions.)

She's quirky and smart, which works for me.

I expect nothing less from the author of the Eclogues and the Aeneid.

It is perhaps inevitable that OP should engender responses outside the narrow technical issue . . . and really, one could ask for the technical help in a generic fashion that did not even indicate the particular application. Nonetheless, as theology is one of my specializations, I remark that Joel Osteen does not claim to be a theologian, which is sound, because he ain't that. And while I understand those who are turned off by religious evangelization, thinking it intrusive propaganda, to ask folks to utterly separate what gives meaning and coherence to their understanding from public pronouncements is both unrealistic and injust. The privatization of religion to that extreme is part of an ideology that is hostile, not neutral towards religious understanding. Such "default atheism" under the rubric of secularism often claims legal or "scientific" justification. That is specious, but if you really think folks should shut up about religion, be fair and shut up about your ideology, your political views, or anything else that happens to be your preferred center of meaning making.

Zack Moss is a power/physical back. Did it work?

But did you put the left sock on first, or the right? The little things matter because the universe is paying attention.

The easy fix for that is to never take it off. Even when you go to bed . . .

Equivocation is definitely a breach of troll protocol.